Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

fam.web.mek.dtu.dk
from fam.web.mek.dtu.dk More from this publisher
28.08.2013 Views

Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Berggreen (2005). A stress singularity at the crack tip for a 2D problem, introduced by each mode of loading, can be defined in a polar coordinate system as where is Kronecker’s delta, T the non-singular stress parallel to the crack surface. r and are radius and angle in a polar coordinate system with origin at the crack tip. and are two functions defining the shape of the stress field, see Figure 1.4. KI and KII are the mode I and II stress intensity factors. If the definition of three crack tip loading modes is applied to the stress field, then the pure mode I stress field will be symmetric with respect to the crack line with and for =0, and the pure mode II is anti-symmetric with and for =0. Consequently, KI and KII can be defined as (1.4) Figure 1.4: Homogeneous near-crack tip definitions. The theory described above is known as homogeneous linear elastic fracture mechanics, which is applicable to the fracture of homogeneous solids where the plasticity at the crack tip is very small compared to the crack geometry. 6 r (1.3)

1.4 Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics in Material Interfaces Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) addresses the fracture of solids in which the size of the zone dominated by non-linear inelastic deformations close to the crack tip is small compared to the crack length. When a crack propagates in homogeneous solids it mostly occurs in opening mode I loading. Even if there is an initial mixed-mode loading at the crack tip, the crack will eventually kink into a path with pure mode I loading. However, in an interface crack between two dissimilar materials this is not the case and the crack tip loading is a mixed-mode loading even if the global load is pure mode I. This is to due asymmetries of moduli and Poisson’s ratios along the interface, where both shear and normal stresses exist in the crack front (He and Hutchinson, 1989). A strong dependency of the fracture toughness and mode-mixity has been observed in different experimental investigations, e.g. Liechti and Chai (1992), making the mode-mixity phase angle an important parameter for the characterisation of interface cracks. Figure 1.5: Interface crack geometry. A general interface crack problem assumes that a crack is located between two orthotropic elastic materials denoted as #1 and #2, as shown in Figure 1.5. Two materials are joined along a straight interface and the crack tip is located at x=0. The displacement and stress fields close to the crack tip can be described according to Suo (1989): where y and x are the opening and sliding relative displacements of the crack flanks, and are normal and shear stresses. K is the complex stress intensity factor defined as (1.7) 7 (1.5) (1.6)

Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Berggreen (2005).<br />

A stress singularity at the crack tip for a 2D problem, introduced by each mode <strong>of</strong> loading, can<br />

be defined in a polar coordinate system as<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

where is Kronecker’s delta, T the non-singular stress parallel to the crack surface. r <strong>and</strong> are<br />

radius <strong>and</strong> angle in a polar coordinate system with origin at the crack tip. <strong>and</strong> <br />

are two functions defining the shape <strong>of</strong> the stress field, see Figure 1.4. KI <strong>and</strong> KII are the mode I<br />

<strong>and</strong> II stress intensity factors. If the definition <strong>of</strong> three crack tip loading modes is applied to the<br />

stress field, then the pure mode I stress field will be symmetric with respect to the crack line with<br />

<strong>and</strong> for =0, <strong>and</strong> the pure mode II is anti-symmetric with <strong>and</strong><br />

for =0. Consequently, KI <strong>and</strong> KII can be defined as<br />

<br />

<br />

(1.4)<br />

Figure 1.4: Homogeneous near-crack tip definitions.<br />

The theory described above is known as homogeneous linear elastic fracture mechanics, which is<br />

applicable to the fracture <strong>of</strong> homogeneous solids where the plasticity at the crack tip is very<br />

small compared to the crack geometry.<br />

6<br />

r<br />

(1.3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!