Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110<br />
q=qG=0.4 Test #1<br />
100<br />
Test #2 Test #3<br />
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000<br />
Cycle<br />
Figure 5.48: Debond diameter vs. cycles for the simulation with the control parameters<br />
qG=q=0.4.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> simulated cycles <strong>and</strong> the computational efficiency <strong>of</strong> the simulations with<br />
different control parameters are listed in Table 5.5. By application <strong>of</strong> the cycle jump method up<br />
to 94% <strong>of</strong> the simulation time has been saved with fair accuracy. Increasing the control<br />
parameters leads to increasing computational efficiency up to 96%, but the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
simulations is considerably lower.<br />
Table 5.5: Computational efficiency <strong>of</strong> solutions with different control parameters.<br />
Control parameter<br />
qG=q<br />
Diameter (mm)<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
Simulation <strong>of</strong> debonded s<strong>and</strong>wich panels<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> simulated cycles Saved simulation cycles (%)<br />
0.4 7121 92.879<br />
0.45 6087 93.913<br />
0. 5 5896 94.104<br />
0.75 5051 94.949<br />
1 3778 96.222<br />
5.4 Conclusion<br />
In this chapter the accelerated fatigue crack growth simulation scheme developed in Chapter 4<br />
was used to study interface fatigue crack growth in s<strong>and</strong>wich composites. Moreover, the<br />
accuracy <strong>and</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> the developed scheme were validated against fatigue experiments<br />
conducted on debond damaged s<strong>and</strong>wich beams <strong>and</strong> panels.<br />
124