Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

fam.web.mek.dtu.dk
from fam.web.mek.dtu.dk More from this publisher
28.08.2013 Views

erroneous extrapolations in the transition from stable to unstable crack growth zone and the extreme non-linearity of this transition. With smaller control parameters smaller jumps occur and the cycle jump scheme is able to extrapolate accurately the stable-unstable crack transition zone. H100 specimens due to slightly different crack growth rate relations and stable crack growth, as also observed in the fatigue experiments, show much less dependency on the control parameters. Additionally, with the chosen initial crack length, the H100 specimens have already passed the highly non-linear region of transition from very slow crack growth rates to much larger growth rates. 200 200 q=qG=0.05 q=qG=0.15 q=qG=0.25 Crack length (mm) 150 100 50 0 q=qG=0.01 q=qG=0.05 q=qG=0.15 q=qG=0.25 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 Cycles Cycles (a) (b) Figure 5.31: The effect of the control parameters on the simulation of (a) H45 and (b) H100 STT specimens. In order to model the initial highly non-linear crack growth zone for the H100 STT specimens, simulations were conducted on the specimens with H100 core and 5 mm smaller initial crack length (20 mm crack length) for a range of different control parameters, see Figure 5.32. Deviations similar to those of the STT specimens with H45 core are seen this time for the qG=q=0.05, 0.15 and 0.25 control parameters, illustrating one of the main limitations of the developed cycle jump scheme. In the case of highly non-linear behaviour of the structure, the control parameters should be chosen carefully to be able to simulate the non-linear zone accurately. This limitation makes the sensitivity and convergence analysis an essential part of incorporating the cycle jump method in the simulation of general fatigue crack growth in structural analysis. Simulation results using qG=q=0.05 control parameters are presented together with experimental results in Figure 5.33. The simulations of the specimens with H100 core show fair accuracy compared to the experimental results. However, large deviations are seen between the simulations and experimental results for the specimens with H45 core. The deviations start at the beginning of the unstable crack growth and remains constant throughout the stable crack growth zone. The reason for this deviation can be found in the interface fatigue characterisation. Since the interface fatigue characterisation was only made for the stable linear part of the crack growth rate diagram (the Paris regime), the resulting da/dN vs. G relation is 112 Crack length (mm) 150 100 50 0 1 mm 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

not valid for unstable crack growth and produces incorrect results. Utilising stable da/dN vs. G relations for unstable fatigue crack growth will result in smaller crack growth estimations, which is seen in Figure 5.33 (a). Crack length (mm) Figure 5.32: The effect of the control parameters on H100 specimens with an initial crack length of 20 mm. 250 200 150 100 50 0 Crack length (mm) 200 150 100 50 0 Cycles (a) 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 Test #1 Test #2 Simulation 0 25000 50000 75000 100000 Cycles 113 q=qG=0.05 q=qG=0.15 q=qG=0.25 0 25000 50000 Cycles (b) 75000 100000 Figure 5.33: Crack length vs. cycles for the STT specimens with (a) H45 and (b) H100 core from experiments and simulations. The number of simulated cycles and the computational efficiency are listed in Table 5.3. Results show that up to 98% of the simulation time can be saved by use of the cycle jump method with reasonable accuracy, which proves a significant computational efficiency. It is seen that Crack length (mm) 200 150 100 50 0 Test #1 Test #2 Simulation

erroneous extrapolations in the transition from stable to unstable crack growth zone <strong>and</strong> the<br />

extreme non-linearity <strong>of</strong> this transition. With smaller control parameters smaller jumps occur <strong>and</strong><br />

the cycle jump scheme is able to extrapolate accurately the stable-unstable crack transition zone.<br />

H100 specimens due to slightly different crack growth rate relations <strong>and</strong> stable crack growth, as<br />

also observed in the fatigue experiments, show much less dependency on the control parameters.<br />

Additionally, with the chosen initial crack length, the H100 specimens have already passed the<br />

highly non-linear region <strong>of</strong> transition from very slow crack growth rates to much larger growth<br />

rates.<br />

200<br />

200 q=qG=0.05<br />

q=qG=0.15<br />

q=qG=0.25<br />

Crack length (mm)<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

q=qG=0.01<br />

q=qG=0.05<br />

q=qG=0.15<br />

q=qG=0.25<br />

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000<br />

Cycles<br />

Cycles<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 5.31: The effect <strong>of</strong> the control parameters on the simulation <strong>of</strong> (a) H45 <strong>and</strong> (b) H100<br />

STT specimens.<br />

In order to model the initial highly non-linear crack growth zone for the H100 STT specimens,<br />

simulations were conducted on the specimens with H100 core <strong>and</strong> 5 mm smaller initial crack<br />

length (20 mm crack length) for a range <strong>of</strong> different control parameters, see Figure 5.32.<br />

Deviations similar to those <strong>of</strong> the STT specimens with H45 core are seen this time for the<br />

qG=q=0.05, 0.15 <strong>and</strong> 0.25 control parameters, illustrating one <strong>of</strong> the main limitations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

developed cycle jump scheme. In the case <strong>of</strong> highly non-linear behaviour <strong>of</strong> the structure, the<br />

control parameters should be chosen carefully to be able to simulate the non-linear zone<br />

accurately. This limitation makes the sensitivity <strong>and</strong> convergence analysis an essential part <strong>of</strong><br />

incorporating the cycle jump method in the simulation <strong>of</strong> general fatigue crack growth in<br />

structural analysis. Simulation results using qG=q=0.05 control parameters are presented<br />

together with experimental results in Figure 5.33. The simulations <strong>of</strong> the specimens with H100<br />

core show fair accuracy compared to the experimental results. However, large deviations are<br />

seen between the simulations <strong>and</strong> experimental results for the specimens with H45 core. The<br />

deviations start at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the unstable crack growth <strong>and</strong> remains constant throughout<br />

the stable crack growth zone. The reason for this deviation can be found in the interface fatigue<br />

characterisation. Since the interface fatigue characterisation was only made for the stable linear<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the crack growth rate diagram (the Paris regime), the resulting da/dN vs. G relation is<br />

112<br />

Crack length (mm)<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1 mm<br />

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!