Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
should be taken into account for a realistic determination <strong>of</strong> the compliance <strong>of</strong> the MMB<br />
specimens. To consider the effect <strong>of</strong> test rig deformations, the compliance <strong>of</strong> the test rig was<br />
determined by use <strong>of</strong> a thick stiff steel beam <strong>of</strong> a thickness <strong>of</strong> 10 mm, width <strong>of</strong> 25 mm <strong>and</strong> length<br />
<strong>of</strong> 250 mm. To determine the compliance <strong>of</strong> the test rig, denoted as Crig in Equation (5.2), the<br />
compliance <strong>of</strong> the steel specimen, Csteel, was subtracted from the measured total compliance,<br />
Cmeasured.<br />
C C C<br />
( 5.2)<br />
rig<br />
measured<br />
steel<br />
The compliance <strong>of</strong> the steel specimen is calculated as<br />
C<br />
steel<br />
cL 2<br />
2L<br />
( 5.3)<br />
3<br />
E b t<br />
st<br />
s<br />
where bs is the width <strong>of</strong> the steel specimen, c is the lever arm distance, t is the thickness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
steel specimen, L is the span distance <strong>and</strong> Est is Young’s modulus <strong>of</strong> the steel specimen. Finally,<br />
the compliance <strong>of</strong> the MMB specimens is determined as<br />
C C C<br />
( 5.4)<br />
MMB<br />
Exp<br />
rig<br />
The MMB rig with the steel specimen was loaded in displacement control with 1 mm/min<br />
loading rate up to 100N for the different lever arm distances (c). The results <strong>of</strong> the compliance<br />
calibration are presented in Figure 5.23. It appears that the compliance <strong>of</strong> the test rig increases in<br />
a nearly linear fashion with increasing c values.<br />
Compliance <strong>of</strong> the test rig (m/N)<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0 20 40<br />
c (mm)<br />
60 80<br />
5.23: Compliance <strong>of</strong> the MMB test rig as a function <strong>of</strong> lever arm distances, c.<br />
To have an initial crack location for the MMB specimens similar to the initial crack location in<br />
the STT specimens, <strong>and</strong> to penetrate the resin blob at the crack tip, pre-cracking was conducted<br />
on the MMB specimens. A pre-cracking method proposed by Quispitupa et al. (2011) was used.<br />
The pre-cracking was conducted on a variant <strong>of</strong> a double cantilever beam configuration as shown<br />
in Figure 5.24. The specimen is clamped between two steel 20 mm thick blocks. A steel block is<br />
106