Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
mode-mixity phase angle was chosen in the finite element model of the MMB specimen to determine the appropriate lever arm distance (c). It is assumed that because of the mode I dominant loading for phase angles more than -20, the characterisation of the face/core interface for only -20 phase angle and using the resulting crack growth rates for the simulation of STT specimens with slightly lower phase angle magnitudes (-20
Displacement controlled static tests with 1 mm/min loading rate were conducted on two MMB specimens of each core type to determine the static crack propagation load. Typical load vs. displacement curves from the static tests are presented in Figure 5.22. The point where the crack starts to propagate is marked with an open circle (“”). The critical failure load is marked according to the ASTM D6671/D 6671M-06 recommendation and complemented by visual inspection. Load (N) 80 60 40 20 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 2 4 6 Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) (a) (b) Figure 5.22: Typical load vs. displacement curves (“” onset of crack growth) for the MMB sandwich specimens with (a) H45 core and (b) H100 core. Fatigue tests in displacement control with sinusoidal wave form were conducted on three specimens of each core type at a frequency of 2 Hz and with a loading ratio R=0.1. Displacement controlled testing was chosen for better servo-hydraulic control of the loading and to avoid any unstable crack growth in the MMB specimens. To have a stable crack growth, 80% of the static crack propagation load was chosen as the maximum fatigue load after testing a few trial specimens. The crack length was determined every 50 cycles using the compliance of the MMB specimen as 105 ( 5.1) Where c is the lever arm distance, L the half-span length, is the load partitioning parameter. C1, C2 and C3 are compliances of the sub-beams according to Quispitupa et al. (2009) as introduced in Chapter 3. For further details see Chapter 3. Moreover, visual crack length measurement was performed by a calliper with an accuracy of ±0.05 mm. The maximum fatigue load (Pmax) and the corresponding displacement (max) were used to determine the compliance of the MMB specimens and subsequently the crack length. The MMB compliance in Equation (5.1) is a function of the crack length. Knowing the maximum load (Pmax) and displacement (max) from the testing machine, the compliance CMMB=/P can be calculated and subsequently the crack length can be determined, see Chapter 3. Furthermore, since the MMB test rig has several hinge connections and load introduction points, the deflections of the test rig during the fatigue tests Load (N) 160 120 80 40
- Page 76 and 77: (a) Debonded face sheet Figure 3.16
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 3.19 shows the determined en
- Page 80 and 81: H130 MMB H130 Panel H250 MMB Interf
- Page 82 and 83: 3.6 Conclusion In this chapter the
- Page 84 and 85: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 86 and 87: composite laminates under thermal c
- Page 88 and 89: S S y( t ) y( t ) ( t ) 2 1 12 2
- Page 90 and 91: listed in Table 4.1. The length and
- Page 92 and 93: The strain energy release rate, G,
- Page 94 and 95: high growth rate of G (see Figure 4
- Page 96 and 97: 4.4 Face/Core Fatigue Crack Growth
- Page 98 and 99: Debond 310 mm Symmetry B. C. a Figu
- Page 100 and 101: B 2 1/ 2 ( S44 S55 S45) (4.17) wh
- Page 102 and 103: 75), which illustrates possible ina
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 4.18 (a) presents the deflec
- Page 106 and 107: Debond radius (mm) 100 90 80 70 60
- Page 108 and 109: using the cycle jump method, more t
- Page 110 and 111: Chapter 5 Face/Core Interface Fatig
- Page 112 and 113: of this chapter, sandwich panels wi
- Page 114 and 115: H250 Specimen H100 Specimen H45 Spe
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 5.5: Test setup. Initially,
- Page 118 and 119: H100 Specimen Fibre bridging Figure
- Page 120 and 121: propagation, the crack continues to
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 5.14: Kinking of the crack i
- Page 124 and 125: Crack length [mm] Crack length [mm]
- Page 128 and 129: should be taken into account for a
- Page 130 and 131: Figure 5.25: Kinking of the crack i
- Page 132 and 133: log (da/dN) (mm/cycle) 10 log G (J/
- Page 134 and 135: erroneous extrapolations in the tra
- Page 136 and 137: compared to the 65% efficiency obta
- Page 138 and 139: the case of uneven debond growth, t
- Page 140 and 141: Load (kN) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Panel 1 Pan
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 5.42: Zero and ninety degree
- Page 144 and 145: G(J/m 2 ) 180 150 210 120 150 100 5
- Page 146 and 147: 110 q=qG=0.4 Test #1 100 Test #2 Te
- Page 148 and 149: panels were determined for differen
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Wor
- Page 152 and 153: toughness using MMB fracture toughn
- Page 154 and 155: For the specimens with H250 core th
- Page 156 and 157: Development of testing methods for
- Page 158 and 159: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 160 and 161: Bezazi A., Mahi A. E., Berthelot J.
- Page 162 and 163: Kanny K. and Mahfuz H. (2005), Flex
- Page 164 and 165: Ratcliffe J. and Cantwell W. J. (20
- Page 166 and 167: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 168 and 169: Out-of-plane displacement (mm) 1 0.
- Page 170 and 171: Out-of-plane displacement (mm) 3 2
- Page 172 and 173: A.5 Out-of-plane deflection of Debo
- Page 174 and 175: (a) Figure A.14: Out-of-plane defle
Displacement controlled static tests with 1 mm/min loading rate were conducted on two MMB<br />
specimens <strong>of</strong> each core type to determine the static crack propagation load. Typical load vs.<br />
displacement curves from the static tests are presented in Figure 5.22. The point where the crack<br />
starts to propagate is marked with an open circle (“”). The critical failure load is marked<br />
according to the ASTM D6671/D 6671M-06 recommendation <strong>and</strong> complemented by visual<br />
inspection.<br />
Load (N)<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3<br />
0 2 4 6<br />
Displacement (mm)<br />
Displacement (mm)<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
Figure 5.22: Typical load vs. displacement curves (“” onset <strong>of</strong> crack growth) for the MMB<br />
s<strong>and</strong>wich specimens with (a) H45 core <strong>and</strong> (b) H100 core.<br />
<strong>Fatigue</strong> tests in displacement control with sinusoidal wave form were conducted on three<br />
specimens <strong>of</strong> each core type at a frequency <strong>of</strong> 2 Hz <strong>and</strong> with a loading ratio R=0.1. Displacement<br />
controlled testing was chosen for better servo-hydraulic control <strong>of</strong> the loading <strong>and</strong> to avoid any<br />
unstable crack growth in the MMB specimens. To have a stable crack growth, 80% <strong>of</strong> the static<br />
crack propagation load was chosen as the maximum fatigue load after testing a few trial<br />
specimens. The crack length was determined every 50 cycles using the compliance <strong>of</strong> the MMB<br />
specimen as<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
105<br />
( 5.1)<br />
Where c is the lever arm distance, L the half-span length, is the load partitioning parameter. C1,<br />
C2 <strong>and</strong> C3 are compliances <strong>of</strong> the sub-beams according to Quispitupa et al. (2009) as introduced<br />
in Chapter 3. For further details see Chapter 3. Moreover, visual crack length measurement was<br />
performed by a calliper with an accuracy <strong>of</strong> ±0.05 mm. The maximum fatigue load (Pmax) <strong>and</strong><br />
the corresponding displacement (max) were used to determine the compliance <strong>of</strong> the MMB<br />
specimens <strong>and</strong> subsequently the crack length. The MMB compliance in Equation (5.1) is a<br />
function <strong>of</strong> the crack length. Knowing the maximum load (Pmax) <strong>and</strong> displacement (max) from<br />
the testing machine, the compliance CMMB=/P can be calculated <strong>and</strong> subsequently the crack<br />
length can be determined, see Chapter 3. Furthermore, since the MMB test rig has several hinge<br />
connections <strong>and</strong> load introduction points, the deflections <strong>of</strong> the test rig during the fatigue tests<br />
Load (N)<br />
160<br />
120<br />
80<br />
40