Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Since the observed large-scale fibre bridging in the STT specimens with H250 core violates the<br />
initial assumptions <strong>of</strong> linear elastic fracture mechanics in the developed numerical fatigue crack<br />
growth scheme, the H250 specimens were discarded <strong>and</strong> characterisation <strong>of</strong> the interface was<br />
only performed for the specimens with H100 <strong>and</strong> H45 core. MMB s<strong>and</strong>wich specimens <strong>of</strong> each<br />
core type were manufactured with 20 mm core <strong>and</strong> 2 mm face sheet thickness. An initial 20 mm<br />
long start crack was defined in the face/core interface <strong>of</strong> the MMB specimens by inserting a<br />
Teflon film, 30 m thick, during the manufacturing process. Similar face sheets, core materials<br />
<strong>and</strong> manufacturing processes as for the STT specimens were used in the manufacturing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MMB specimens. The specimens were 35 mm wide with a span length (2L) <strong>of</strong> 160 mm.<br />
Figure 5.19: Mixed mode bending rig with the MMB s<strong>and</strong>wich specimen.<br />
To determine the mode-mixity at which the face/core interface fatigue behaviour should be<br />
characterised by MMB tests, the mode-mixity phase angle at the crack tip <strong>of</strong> the STT specimens<br />
was evaluated by the finite element method at a load corresponding to the maximum fatigue load<br />
in the STT fatigue tests (to be presented in the next section). In all the STT specimens the modemixity<br />
phase angle for different crack lengths is between -5 to -20 , which implies mode I<br />
dominant loading at the crack tip. The MMB lever arm distances (c) resulting in similar modemixities<br />
as those <strong>of</strong> the STT specimens were determined from the finite element model <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MMB specimen shown in Figure 5.20. The FE model was developed using PLANE42 elements<br />
in the commercial finite element code ANSYS. The phase angle <strong>and</strong> the energy release rate are<br />
determined from relative nodal pair displacements along the crack flanks obtained from the finite<br />
element analysis using the CSDE method as outlined in Chapter 1. The characteristic length h is<br />
arbitrarily chosen as the face sheet thickness. Figure 5.21 shows the variation <strong>of</strong> the mode-mixity<br />
phase angle vs. the lever arm distance (c) in the MMB specimens. At small level arm distances<br />
the mode-mixity phase angle increases significantly <strong>and</strong> mode II dominant loading is present at<br />
the crack tip. Increasing the c distance, the phase angle converges to around -20 for the present<br />
specimen geometry. It appears that with the current design <strong>of</strong> the test rig <strong>and</strong> the MMB specimen<br />
it is not possible to reach mode-mixity phase angles more than -20. Therefore, only a -20<br />
103