Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 5.5: Test setup.<br />
Initially, to investigate the static behaviour <strong>and</strong> maximum load carrying capacity <strong>of</strong> the STT<br />
specimens, static tests were carried out on two specimens for each core density. Ramped<br />
displacement controlled loading with a piston displacement rate <strong>of</strong> 1 mm/min was applied to all<br />
tests. A sample rate <strong>of</strong> one image per second was used for the DIC measurements. Figure 5.6<br />
shows typical load vs. axial actuator displacement for the STT specimens, for additional results<br />
see Appendix C. The load initially increases linearly until face/core debond crack initiation<br />
occurs. After the first crack propagation the load drops, but as the crack propagates further the<br />
maximum load remains approximately constant. The maximum load in fatigue tests is chosen as<br />
a portion <strong>of</strong> the average <strong>of</strong> this mainly constant load. It is also seen that by increasing the core<br />
density, the crack initiation <strong>and</strong> propagation loads increase, which can be attributed to the larger<br />
fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> heavier cores.<br />
Force (kN)<br />
Measurement area<br />
1.2<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
0<br />
H45 Specimen<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10<br />
Axial displacement (mm)<br />
Figure 5.6: Typical axial displacement <strong>of</strong> the actuator vs. force for specimens with H45, H100<br />
<strong>and</strong> H250 core densities.<br />
94<br />
Actuator piston<br />
Load cell<br />
H250 Specimen<br />
H100 Specimen<br />
H45