28.08.2013 Views

Rasmus ÿstergaard forside 100%.indd - Solid Mechanics

Rasmus ÿstergaard forside 100%.indd - Solid Mechanics

Rasmus ÿstergaard forside 100%.indd - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interface crack in sandwich specimen 311<br />

Fig. 8 The curves show normalized lengths of the intact part of the sandwich specimen that gives 5% error in the energy release rate<br />

calculated by (16)<br />

Tvergaard and Hutchinson 1993). A detailed fracture<br />

mechanical characterization of the interface would thus<br />

include measuring interfaces under various mode mixities.<br />

Inspired by Sørensen et al. (2006), we propose a test<br />

set-up for measuring the interfacial fracture toughness<br />

for face sheet/core debonding under mixed mode loading<br />

conditions. The test is based on a double cantilever<br />

beam sandwich specimen loaded with uneven bending<br />

moments (DCB-UBM). The moments are applied by a<br />

wire/roller system at the cracked ends of the specimen.<br />

The uncracked end is supported by rollers maintaining<br />

static equilibrium. Figure 9 shows a sketch of the test<br />

set-up. The force in the wire is assumed to be the same<br />

everywhere and the applied moments are then determined<br />

solely from the wire force, F, and the moment<br />

arms, ℓ1 and ℓ2. The ratio between the applied moments<br />

are ℓ1 and this ratio is altered by changing the distance<br />

ℓ2<br />

between the rollers on each arm.<br />

The imposed loading consists of the moments M1,<br />

M2 and M3 = M1 − M2 and is a special case of the<br />

load situation analyzed above (P1 = P2 = P3 = 0).<br />

For this load combination the energy release rate is<br />

G = c2<br />

16h3 <br />

M2 1<br />

− (M1 − M2) 2<br />

<br />

.<br />

I1<br />

+ M2 2<br />

I2<br />

I3<br />

The mode mixity is obtained from (17) where now λ<br />

becomes<br />

M1<br />

V M2<br />

λ =<br />

U<br />

C2 − C2<br />

M1<br />

M2 (C3<br />

. (18)<br />

− 1) − C3<br />

As an example, consider an adhesive joint consisting<br />

of aluminum adherents having the elastic constants<br />

E2 = 70GPa, ν2 = 0.3 and epoxy adhesive with the the<br />

elastic constants E1 = 7 GPa and ν1 = 0.3. Assume that<br />

η = h/H = 0.1. Assuming plane strain conditions,<br />

(2) and (1) give≈ 0.1 and β = −0.28 ≈ −0.3,<br />

respectively. From Table 1 we find ω( = 0.1, β =<br />

−0.3, η = 0) = 21◦ and from Table 2 we obtain<br />

ω(0.1, −0.3, 0.2) = 32◦ . By linear interpolation between<br />

these two values we find an estimate of the phase<br />

angle ω(0.1, −0.3, 0.1) ≈ 26.5◦ .<br />

Having determined ω, we obtain the load ratio parameter<br />

λ from (18). Then, we can determine ψ for any<br />

combination using (17). The mode mixity is shown as<br />

function of the ratio between the moments in Fig. 10.<br />

As a second example, consider a sandwich specimen<br />

with a polymer foam core (E1 = 200 MPa, ν1 = 0.3)<br />

and glass fiber face sheets (E2 = 40 GPa, ν2 = 0.3).<br />

Assuming plane strain conditions, (2) and (1)gives≈<br />

0.005 and β =−0.28 ≈−0.3. Here we assume η = 5.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!