Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Numerical</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Swirling</strong> Flow in Scavenging Process for 2-Stroke<br />
Marine Diesel Engines<br />
Chapter 2<br />
that have been used by the scientific community <strong>and</strong> this <strong>of</strong>ten makes it<br />
difficult to compare the results <strong>of</strong> one case <strong>of</strong> swirling flow with the other. In<br />
its simplest definition, the swirl parameter is defined as ‘the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
maximum tangential velocity to the maximum axial velocity’ (Alekseenko et<br />
al., 2007). Greitzer et al. (2004) has adopted the definition as the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
tangential to axial velocity. The definition by Gupta et al (1984) defines swirl<br />
number as ‘the ratio <strong>of</strong> axial flux <strong>of</strong> angular momentum to axial flux <strong>of</strong> axial<br />
momentum times the size L (which in case <strong>of</strong> cylindrical vortex chamber is<br />
the internal radius R <strong>of</strong> the chamber)’ (Alekseenko et al., 2007).<br />
Where<br />
S<br />
F<br />
mm<br />
(2.5)<br />
Fm<br />
L<br />
<br />
F v v vv r dA (2.6)<br />
mm a z<br />
A<br />
is the angular momentum flux taking into account the component <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Reynolds shear stress tensor <strong>and</strong><br />
<br />
2 2 <br />
F v vp p dA (2.7)<br />
m a a<br />
A<br />
is the momentum flux in axial direction taking in to account the normal<br />
component <strong>of</strong> Reynolds stress tensor in axial direction. The pressure<br />
represents the axial thrust (Khanna V. K., 2001).<br />
The calculation <strong>of</strong> swirl number based on above equations (2.5-2.7) is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
very difficult because the velocity fields are usually unknown a priori<br />
(Alekseenko et al., 2007). The above equations are also simplified by<br />
dropping the shear stress <strong>and</strong> pressure terms. In case <strong>of</strong> experimental results,<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> above equations requires a complete knowledge <strong>of</strong> the velocity<br />
field for both axial <strong>and</strong> tangential components for a given cross-sectional<br />
plane. Consequently, for experiments where measurements are conducted<br />
for a part <strong>of</strong> the cross-sectional plane, the aforementioned equations cannot<br />
be used to estimate the degree <strong>of</strong> swirl.<br />
Another estimate <strong>of</strong> the swirl parameter is based on the geometrical<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> the vortex chamber called as ‘design swirl parameter’<br />
(Alekseenko et al., 2007):<br />
Ddc<br />
S <br />
(2.8)<br />
A<br />
i<br />
20<br />
<strong>Swirling</strong> Flows