Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Experimental and Numerical Study of Swirling ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Numerical</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Swirling</strong> Flow in Scavenging Process for 2-Stroke<br />
Marine Diesel Engines<br />
Chapter 1<br />
Figure 1.4 gives a comparison <strong>of</strong> scavenging performance <strong>of</strong> different<br />
aforementioned scavenging types based on two parameters (Heywood, 1988):<br />
Delivery Ratio<br />
<br />
Mass <strong>of</strong> delivered air or mixture per cycle<br />
Reference (exhuast gas) mass<br />
Mass <strong>of</strong> air in trapped cylinder charge<br />
Purity <br />
mass <strong>of</strong> trapped cylinder charge<br />
(Schweitzer P. H., 1949) describes the ideal engine scavenging process as:<br />
‘‘The ideal engine scavenges the cylinder <strong>of</strong> all residual products <strong>of</strong> combustion, fills it with<br />
uncontaminated fresh air, <strong>and</strong> in so doing wastes no fresh air through the exhaust.’’<br />
This is also defined as ‘perfect displacement scavenging process’ by<br />
Hopkinson (1914). In the perfect displacement scavenging process all fresh<br />
air charge entering the cylinder is retained <strong>and</strong> perfectly displaces the exhaust<br />
gases (Blair, 1990). In actually engine scavenging processes there always<br />
occurs mixing <strong>of</strong> fresh air charge with the exhaust gases. However, the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> mixing depends on the type <strong>of</strong> scavenging. In ideal scavenging, the<br />
scavenge air acts like a piston <strong>and</strong> pushes the exhaust gases out <strong>of</strong> cylinder<br />
without mixing with them (Schweitzer, 1949). From figure 1.4 it can be seen<br />
that the uniflow scavenging type is most efficient one. Uniflow flow<br />
scavenging is the most efficient scavenging system but require added cost <strong>of</strong><br />
exhaust valve system (Pulkrabek, 2003). Also it accounts for higher engine<br />
thermal efficiency due to better air/ gas exchange (Pevzner, 1998). Today<br />
almost all <strong>of</strong> the modern large marine diesel engines use uniflow scavenging<br />
(Raunek, 2009). Earlier measurements conducted on some marine diesel<br />
engines, manufactured by MAN Diesel A/S, resulted in 98% <strong>of</strong> purity at a<br />
delivery ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.5 (MAN Diesel, 2010). This shows that the uniflow<br />
scavenging in that engine has better performance than the one given in<br />
figure 1.4. However, optimization <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> air used during the<br />
scavenging process is still a challenging <strong>and</strong> potential task in order to<br />
improve the overall engine system efficiency <strong>and</strong> also to reduce cost due to<br />
scavenging system delivering excess amount <strong>of</strong> air than is actually needed.<br />
1.5 <strong>Swirling</strong> Flow during Uniflow Scavenging<br />
Process<br />
As discussed in section 1.2, in addition to exhaust gas scavenging as the main<br />
criteria, the design <strong>of</strong> uniflow scavenging process also considers to provide a<br />
‘mixing favorable’ flow field to the injected diesel fuel at the end <strong>of</strong><br />
compression stroke. Introducing swirl in the flow has a wide spread use in<br />
many engineering applications for enhancement <strong>of</strong> mixing process. Swirl in<br />
the in-cylinder flow is introduced by making the intake ports at an angle to<br />
7<br />
Introduction