28.08.2013 Views

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 Chapter 6 Design of acousto-optical interaction [P3]-[P7]<br />

increase in Δ eff,1 [%]<br />

(b)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

2r/w [−]<br />

Figure 6.12 Study of the influence of an air hole below the waveguide with radius r. (a):<br />

The color bar indicates ∆n11/ √ P and the time average power flow in the x3-direction is<br />

shown by the contour lines with an arbitrary scale. (b): Increase in ∆neff,1 as function of<br />

2r/w.<br />

a simpler design change can be introduced. The optimization suggests that it as<br />

an advantage to have an air hole underneath the output domain. To explore this<br />

tendency further an air hole is introduced in the form of a half circle with the radius<br />

r, see figure 6.12(a). The increase in ∆neff,1 as function of 2r/w, where w is the<br />

width of the waveguide, is illustrated by figure 6.12(b). An optimum is obtained<br />

around 2r/w = 0.8 where the interaction has increased with 65% compared to the<br />

case without the air hole. When r is increasing two effects will influence the interaction.<br />

First, the hole will trap the Rayleigh wave in the waveguide and introduce<br />

additional strain concentrations that increase ∆n11/ √ P , see figure 6.12(a). As r<br />

grows, strain is confined more and more to the waveguide above the hole until finally<br />

the hole reaches a size, where the Rayleigh wave will be reflected instead. This<br />

explains the sudden dip in the graph. The other effect is that the optical mode gets<br />

more confined to the waveguide due to the refractive index contrast in the air. The<br />

total increase in interaction is small compared to the increase obtained by topology<br />

optimization, so the other air holes in the optimized design have an important influence<br />

on the performance. To determine if the increased interaction is mainly due<br />

to the strains around the hole or due to the better confinement of the optical wave,<br />

the interaction ∆neff,1 is compared for the four cases seen in table 6.2. The value 1<br />

Table 6.2 Increase in acousto-optical interaction ∆neff,1 compared to the original<br />

GaAs/AlGaAs structure without the air hole. The original case corresponds to the value 1.<br />

optical mode without hole optical mode with hole<br />

strain without hole 1 1.03<br />

strain with hole 3.29 1.65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!