Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
44 Chapter 6 Design of acousto-optical interaction [P3]-[P7]<br />
Figure 6.9 Results for the buried waveguide where the color bar indicates ∆n11/ √ P<br />
close to the optical waveguide. The time averaged power flow in the x3-direction of the<br />
fundamental mode is indicated by the contour lines with an arbitrary scale.<br />
in the SiO2 layer such that their upper surface is leveled with the substrate surface.<br />
The waveguides still support the two first order modes and for the first one polarized<br />
in the x1-direction the interaction is ∆neff,1 = 7.16 · 10 −5 W −1/2 . This is 8 times<br />
bigger than for the original waveguides on top of the surface. The power flow of<br />
this optical mode is plotted together with ∆n11/ √ P in figure 6.9 and the entire<br />
waveguide is now influenced by the change of the refractive index. For the optical<br />
mode polarized in the x2-direction the interaction is ∆neff,1 = 3.89 · 10 −5 W −1/2 .<br />
From an experimental point of view it is difficult to couple the optical mode to<br />
a waveguide if the height is small, and it is more complicated to fabricate a buried<br />
waveguide than a ridge waveguide. An alternative design is therefore to introduce a<br />
layer of Si next to the waveguide with the height l as seen in figure 6.10(a). This can<br />
simply be fabricated by stopping the etching of the Si on the surface before reaching<br />
the SiO2 layer. In this way the optical mode comes closer to the stresses at the<br />
surface, but the original height of the Si layer is kept such that the optical mode can<br />
be coupled to the waveguide. The interaction ∆neff,ν as function of l is illustrated<br />
in figure 6.10(b) for the two first order modes that the waveguide supports. The<br />
interaction is increasing for increasing l and it is bigger for the mode polarized in the<br />
x1-direction with ∆neff,1 = 1.11 · 10 −4 W −1/2 for l = 2.5 µm. This is 12 times bigger<br />
than for the original geometry and the increase has the same size as for the improved<br />
height and width. For increasing l the mode that is polarized in the x2-direction<br />
is not supported anymore. The power flow of the optical mode and ∆n11/ √ P are<br />
plotted in figure 6.10(a) for l = 0.2 µm. The mode is still confined to the waveguide<br />
area and the Si layer, but now the center is below the waveguide where the stresses<br />
are big. However, the drawback of this design is, that as the mode has a bigger<br />
extension for increasing l the dimensions of other parts in the geometry, as the<br />
input waveguides, taperings and splitters, must be correspondingly bigger.