Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
where<br />
∂Φ<br />
∂w R 2,n<br />
− i ∂Φ<br />
∂wI <br />
= 2<br />
2,n Ωop<br />
∂wR 2<br />
∂x2<br />
− i2 ∂wI <br />
2 ∂φ2,n R<br />
dr = 2S2 − i2S<br />
∂x2 ∂x2 Ωop<br />
I 2<br />
∂φ2,n<br />
∂x2<br />
dr. (29)<br />
The sensitivity analysis follows the standard adjoint sensitivity approach [20]. For further details of the<br />
adjoint sensitivity method applied to wave propagation problems, the reader is referred to [12]. Eq.(27)<br />
for the derivative of the objective function then reduces to<br />
<br />
dΦ ∂Φ<br />
= + Re λ<br />
dξ ∂ξ T ∂Kj2<br />
∂ξ w2<br />
<br />
. (30)<br />
The vectors ∂Φ/∂ξ and <br />
R 2S Ωop 2 − i2SI ∂φ2,n<br />
2 ∂x2 dr as well as the matrix ∂Kj2/∂ξ are assembled in Comsol<br />
Multiphysics as described in [21].<br />
4.6. Practical implementation<br />
The optimization problem Eq.(23)-(24) is solved using the Method of Moving Asymptotes, MMA [22],<br />
which is an algorithm that uses information from the previous iteration steps and gradient information.<br />
When the mesh size is decreased the optimization will in general result in mesh-dependent solutions<br />
with small details, which make the design inconvenient to manufacture. To avoid these problems a<br />
morphology-based filter is employed. Such filters make the material properties of an element depend on a<br />
function of the design variables in a fixed neighborhood around the element such that the finite design is<br />
mesh-independent. Here a Heaviside close-type morphology-based filter is chosen [23], which has proven<br />
efficient for wave-propagation type topology optimization problems, see for instance [11]. The method<br />
results in designs where all holes below the size of the filter (radius rmin) have been eliminated. A further<br />
advantage of these filter-types is that they help eliminating gray elements in the transition zone between<br />
solid and air regions.<br />
5. Results<br />
Results are now presented for the problem shown in Figure 1. The SAW is generated by 6 double<br />
electrode finger pairs. Each of the electrodes has a width equal to 0.7 µm and is placed 0.7 µm apart such<br />
that the wavelength of the generated SAW is 5.6 µm. The waveguide is placed at the surface and has the<br />
width 1.4 µm and the height 0.3 µm. The output domain Ωo consists of the waveguide and an area just<br />
below the waveguide with the same size, in order to increase the possibility that the waveguide will still be<br />
able to confine an optical mode after the optimization. The materials GaAs and AlGaAs are piezoelectric<br />
with cubic crystal structure. The material constants used in the piezoelectric model are given in Table 1<br />
and are here given in the usual matrix form for compactness reasons. For the SAW to propagate in the<br />
piezoelectric direction the material tensors have to be rotated by the angle ϕ2 = π/4. The frequency is<br />
fsaw = 518 MHz (where fsaw = ωsaw/2π), which is the resonance frequency. The constant σj controlling<br />
the damping in the PMLs is set to 10 10 . Elements with maximum side length e1 = 0.6 µm are used in<br />
the domain except in the design domain where it is e2 = 0.1 µm and in the output domain where it is<br />
e3 = 0.02 µm. The optical model is solved both for the initial design, where the design domain is filled<br />
with solid material, and for the optimized design in order to compare the acousto-optical interaction.<br />
The free space wavelength of the optical wave is set to λ0 = 950 nm and the material constants for GaAs<br />
and AlGaAs used in the optical model are given in Table 2. For air simply the refractive index n0 = 1<br />
is used. The logarithm to the objective function for the initial design is found to be Φ = −19.99 and<br />
the acousto-optical interaction measure is ∆neff,1/ (P ) = 1.500 · 10 −5 . Note that these values are low<br />
do the the limited numbers of electrodes, in practice several hundred electrode fingers are employed to<br />
generate a SAW.<br />
Table 1: The elastic stiffness constants, the density, the piezoelectric stress constants and the permittivity<br />
constants for the materials used in the piezoelectric model.<br />
Material c E 11,c E 22,c E 33 c E 12,c E 13,c E 23 c E 44,c E 55,c E 66 ρ e14,e25,e36 ε S 11,ε S 22,ε S 33<br />
[10 11 Nm −2 ] [10 11 Nm −2 ] [10 11 Nm −2 ] [kgm −3 ] [Cm −2 ] [10 −11 Fm]<br />
GaAs 1.1830 0.5320 0.5950 5316.5 -0.160 9.735<br />
AlGaAs 1.1868 0.5396 0.5938 5005.2 -0.152 9.446<br />
6