28.08.2013 Views

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

Maria Bayard Dühring - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where<br />

∂Φ<br />

∂w R 2,n<br />

− i ∂Φ<br />

∂wI <br />

= 2<br />

2,n Ωop<br />

∂wR 2<br />

∂x2<br />

− i2 ∂wI <br />

2 ∂φ2,n R<br />

dr = 2S2 − i2S<br />

∂x2 ∂x2 Ωop<br />

I 2<br />

∂φ2,n<br />

∂x2<br />

dr. (29)<br />

The sensitivity analysis follows the standard adjoint sensitivity approach [20]. For further details of the<br />

adjoint sensitivity method applied to wave propagation problems, the reader is referred to [12]. Eq.(27)<br />

for the derivative of the objective function then reduces to<br />

<br />

dΦ ∂Φ<br />

= + Re λ<br />

dξ ∂ξ T ∂Kj2<br />

∂ξ w2<br />

<br />

. (30)<br />

The vectors ∂Φ/∂ξ and <br />

R 2S Ωop 2 − i2SI ∂φ2,n<br />

2 ∂x2 dr as well as the matrix ∂Kj2/∂ξ are assembled in Comsol<br />

Multiphysics as described in [21].<br />

4.6. Practical implementation<br />

The optimization problem Eq.(23)-(24) is solved using the Method of Moving Asymptotes, MMA [22],<br />

which is an algorithm that uses information from the previous iteration steps and gradient information.<br />

When the mesh size is decreased the optimization will in general result in mesh-dependent solutions<br />

with small details, which make the design inconvenient to manufacture. To avoid these problems a<br />

morphology-based filter is employed. Such filters make the material properties of an element depend on a<br />

function of the design variables in a fixed neighborhood around the element such that the finite design is<br />

mesh-independent. Here a Heaviside close-type morphology-based filter is chosen [23], which has proven<br />

efficient for wave-propagation type topology optimization problems, see for instance [11]. The method<br />

results in designs where all holes below the size of the filter (radius rmin) have been eliminated. A further<br />

advantage of these filter-types is that they help eliminating gray elements in the transition zone between<br />

solid and air regions.<br />

5. Results<br />

Results are now presented for the problem shown in Figure 1. The SAW is generated by 6 double<br />

electrode finger pairs. Each of the electrodes has a width equal to 0.7 µm and is placed 0.7 µm apart such<br />

that the wavelength of the generated SAW is 5.6 µm. The waveguide is placed at the surface and has the<br />

width 1.4 µm and the height 0.3 µm. The output domain Ωo consists of the waveguide and an area just<br />

below the waveguide with the same size, in order to increase the possibility that the waveguide will still be<br />

able to confine an optical mode after the optimization. The materials GaAs and AlGaAs are piezoelectric<br />

with cubic crystal structure. The material constants used in the piezoelectric model are given in Table 1<br />

and are here given in the usual matrix form for compactness reasons. For the SAW to propagate in the<br />

piezoelectric direction the material tensors have to be rotated by the angle ϕ2 = π/4. The frequency is<br />

fsaw = 518 MHz (where fsaw = ωsaw/2π), which is the resonance frequency. The constant σj controlling<br />

the damping in the PMLs is set to 10 10 . Elements with maximum side length e1 = 0.6 µm are used in<br />

the domain except in the design domain where it is e2 = 0.1 µm and in the output domain where it is<br />

e3 = 0.02 µm. The optical model is solved both for the initial design, where the design domain is filled<br />

with solid material, and for the optimized design in order to compare the acousto-optical interaction.<br />

The free space wavelength of the optical wave is set to λ0 = 950 nm and the material constants for GaAs<br />

and AlGaAs used in the optical model are given in Table 2. For air simply the refractive index n0 = 1<br />

is used. The logarithm to the objective function for the initial design is found to be Φ = −19.99 and<br />

the acousto-optical interaction measure is ∆neff,1/ (P ) = 1.500 · 10 −5 . Note that these values are low<br />

do the the limited numbers of electrodes, in practice several hundred electrode fingers are employed to<br />

generate a SAW.<br />

Table 1: The elastic stiffness constants, the density, the piezoelectric stress constants and the permittivity<br />

constants for the materials used in the piezoelectric model.<br />

Material c E 11,c E 22,c E 33 c E 12,c E 13,c E 23 c E 44,c E 55,c E 66 ρ e14,e25,e36 ε S 11,ε S 22,ε S 33<br />

[10 11 Nm −2 ] [10 11 Nm −2 ] [10 11 Nm −2 ] [kgm −3 ] [Cm −2 ] [10 −11 Fm]<br />

GaAs 1.1830 0.5320 0.5950 5316.5 -0.160 9.735<br />

AlGaAs 1.1868 0.5396 0.5938 5005.2 -0.152 9.446<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!