28.08.2013 Views

High front guttering advisory committee report - NSW Fair Trading ...

High front guttering advisory committee report - NSW Fair Trading ...

High front guttering advisory committee report - NSW Fair Trading ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 Background<br />

The following includes paraphrased points from the “Terms of Reference” contained in<br />

Appendix A.<br />

• <strong>High</strong> <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong> systems have been supplied and fitted on a widespread basis across<br />

Australia for almost 20 years. The BCA provides a legislated basis for setting minimum<br />

mandatory levels of <strong>guttering</strong> performance. The BCA provides different methods of<br />

providing appropriate building solutions that comply with performance requirements.<br />

Deemed to Satisfy options include the BCA’s own Acceptable Construction Practices and<br />

Australian Standard AS3500. Both options state the need for <strong>guttering</strong> systems to<br />

adequately manage overflow from gutters.<br />

• In 2008, claims were made by a building practitioner that high <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong> design and<br />

installation methods, in widespread use throughout <strong>NSW</strong>, did not meet BCA requirements.<br />

Concerns were particularly raised about the adequacy of slots in high <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong> as<br />

the single, appropriate overflow measure.<br />

• <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trading</strong> is of the view that slots in high <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong> are only one of a range of<br />

measures advised in the BCA and in AS3500 for dealing appropriately with overflow.<br />

Overflow systems must be designed and installed in compliance with meeting BCA<br />

performance requirements.<br />

• Nevertheless in response to the claims made in 2008, <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trading</strong> convened a forum<br />

with all major industry stakeholders, insurers, manufacturers and government agencies. The<br />

forum concluded that there was no evidence at hand to suggest that high <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong><br />

was a systemic failure issue in <strong>NSW</strong> i.e. the forum did not uncover any evidence to suggest<br />

that the installation of high <strong>front</strong>ed <strong>guttering</strong> was creating widespread overflow problems<br />

leading to water ingress into residential buildings in either <strong>NSW</strong> or elsewhere in Australia.<br />

• Notwithstanding, the forum did conclude that an amendment to the BCA was required to<br />

remove its existing advice on “slotted <strong>guttering</strong>”. The forum was of the view that the existing<br />

reference to slotted <strong>guttering</strong> in the BCA may mislead building practitioners into believing<br />

that slotted gutters on their own would satisfy the BCA’s performance requirements. <strong>NSW</strong><br />

<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trading</strong> made a representation to the Australian Building Codes Board that this matter<br />

be addressed.<br />

• In addition to holding the forum, <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trading</strong> and other <strong>NSW</strong> agencies implemented<br />

the following measures:<br />

o in conjunction with the Master Plumbers Association of <strong>NSW</strong> produced a circular to<br />

remind roof plumbers about the codes and standards for installing gutters;<br />

o placed installation guidelines with example diagrams from AS3500 on its website;<br />

o wrote to over 150 councils across <strong>NSW</strong> reminding them of the need for council<br />

certifiers to check <strong>guttering</strong> against the codes and standards and inviting them to<br />

forward the details of any cases where it was believed that property damage has<br />

occurred due to inadequate gutters;<br />

o consulted with builders and tradespersons at trade seminars during 2008-2009;<br />

o discussed the issue with regulators from other States and Territories; and<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!