28.08.2013 Views

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial wastes and 30% <strong>of</strong> municipal wastes will be disposed at landfills, and the total<br />

landfilled waste will be 0.73 million tonnes <strong>in</strong> 2016. Therefore, the amount <strong>of</strong> stocked<br />

plastic wastes <strong>in</strong> the landfill process will be around 1 million tonnes out <strong>of</strong> which 0.67<br />

million tonnes can be recovered to produce recycled pellets and crude oil.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g rate will decrease the amount <strong>of</strong> improper disposal <strong>of</strong> waste <strong>in</strong><br />

2016. Approximately 8% <strong>of</strong> improper disposed wastes <strong>in</strong> MSW will be expanded and<br />

stocked <strong>in</strong> the environment. The total stock <strong>in</strong> the environment will be 0.46 million tonnes,<br />

as the total stock <strong>of</strong> the scenario 2A will be 4.39 million tonnes <strong>in</strong> 2016. The highest<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> stocked plastics was shown <strong>in</strong> the plastic consumption process amounted to 1.97<br />

million tonnes. This stock is from the long-live plastic products and reused/secondary<br />

plastic products. This amount <strong>of</strong> stocked plastics will be highest <strong>in</strong> the next five or ten<br />

years if the waste reduction and reuse policy stimulates people to use long-lived products<br />

for over five or ten years.<br />

Scenario 2B: Increase <strong>in</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g rate by 30% with promot<strong>in</strong>g bio-plastics<br />

The plastic bag taxation is not used now, but FPRI is the one organization who studied on<br />

the feasibility <strong>of</strong> plastic bag taxation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Thailand</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2011. The proposed plan for the plastic<br />

bag taxation <strong>in</strong>cludes bann<strong>in</strong>g conventional plastic bags, promot<strong>in</strong>g the biodegradable<br />

plastic products, collect<strong>in</strong>g bag charges, and support<strong>in</strong>g plastic bag recycl<strong>in</strong>g. Figure 4.30<br />

illustrates the material flow <strong>of</strong> plastics <strong>in</strong> <strong>Thailand</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2016; the scenario 2B.<br />

From Figure 4.30, the amounts <strong>of</strong> MPW disposed <strong>of</strong> scenario 2B at the municipal and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration and landfill sites are equal to those amounts <strong>of</strong> scenario 2A.<br />

Likewise, the percentage <strong>of</strong> plastic waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this scenario will <strong>in</strong>crease by 30% <strong>in</strong><br />

2016 as well as the scenario 2A because the plastic bag taxation promotes to charge the<br />

plastic bag fee for support<strong>in</strong>g the plastic bag recycl<strong>in</strong>g. This scenario also did not promote<br />

the waste to energy scheme, so the amounts <strong>of</strong> MPW for oil recovery and <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration are<br />

the same as the scenario 1 and scenario 2A.<br />

The amounts <strong>of</strong> MPW and IPW reused, landfill<strong>in</strong>g and disposed <strong>in</strong> open environment <strong>of</strong><br />

the scenario 2B are different from the scenario 2A. 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial wastes and 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

municipal plastic wastes will be separated and reused <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

consumption processes. Approximately 1% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial wastes and 40% <strong>of</strong> municipal<br />

wastes will be disposed at landfills, and the total landfilled waste will be 0.97 million<br />

tonnes <strong>in</strong> 2016. Therefore, the amount <strong>of</strong> stocked plastic wastes <strong>in</strong> the landfill process will<br />

be around 1.2 million tonnes out <strong>of</strong> which 0.91 million tonnes can be recovered to produce<br />

recycled pellets and crude oil.<br />

Although, there is the reduction <strong>of</strong> plastic waste generation from the bann<strong>in</strong>g plastic bag<br />

strategy, the amount <strong>of</strong> waste generation may slightly decrease because there is the<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> biodegradable plastic products. This scenario followed by plastic bag<br />

taxation which simulates the plastic manufactur<strong>in</strong>g to decrease plastic bag production, but<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease to produce the amount <strong>of</strong> biodegradable plastics. Similarly, people have to use<br />

biodegradable plastics <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> plastic bags followed by this taxation. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> biodegradable plastics is that they can be degraded by anaerobic condition at<br />

landfills with<strong>in</strong> one year (NIA, 2008). The government must be careful on this taxation use<br />

because it directly affects the recycl<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess and amount <strong>of</strong> stocked wastes at landfills.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!