28.08.2013 Views

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Collect<strong>in</strong>g and record<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

The stakeholder <strong>in</strong>formation or characteristics should be considered, and there are many<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> stakeholders such as Internal/external stakeholders, knowledge <strong>of</strong> policy,<br />

position, <strong>in</strong>terest, alliances, resources, power, and leadership. These data from all<br />

stakeholders should be reviewed and recorded <strong>in</strong> the stakeholder table which is shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 2.6.<br />

Table 2.6 Stakeholder Table (Schmeer, 2013)<br />

Before beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g primary data collection, secondary data are reviewed and collected on the<br />

priority stakeholders. For primary data collection from <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g, ask<strong>in</strong>g direct<br />

questions may seem the most efficient method but could result <strong>in</strong> unreliable answers<br />

because the stakeholders may not be comfortable to communicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such a direct and<br />

candid manner. Questions should be clearly stated, specific, and open-ended wherever<br />

possible, requir<strong>in</strong>g the stakeholder to provide more than a simple “yes” or “no” answer.<br />

3. Fill<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>in</strong> the stakeholder table<br />

After review<strong>in</strong>g and data collection, <strong>in</strong>formation is added <strong>in</strong>to the stakeholder table (see<br />

Table 2.6) because it helps to analyze stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the project easily. There are many<br />

methods to complete stakeholder table as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

3.1 Determ<strong>in</strong>e the stakeholders’ position<br />

The position and organization are filled by consider<strong>in</strong>g on works <strong>of</strong> stakeholder. Internal<br />

(I) stakeholders work with<strong>in</strong> the organization that is promot<strong>in</strong>g or implement<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

project, and other stakeholders are considered as external (E) stakeholders. The level <strong>of</strong><br />

accurate knowledge <strong>of</strong> stakeholder has regard<strong>in</strong>g the project under analysis. This<br />

knowledge should be rated from 3 to 1 (3 = a lot, 2 = some, and 1 = none). The def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

column is use to record how each stakeholder def<strong>in</strong>es the project.<br />

The position column refers to the stakeholder’s status as a supporter or opponent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project. The position <strong>of</strong> the stakeholder can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by gather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation directly<br />

from the stakeholder (i.e., self-report<strong>in</strong>g), and through <strong>in</strong>formation gathered <strong>in</strong>directly from<br />

other stakeholders or secondary <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e., other perceptions). This column is<br />

divided <strong>in</strong>to three columns such as self (self-reported classification), other (classification<br />

by others), and f<strong>in</strong>al (f<strong>in</strong>al classification consider<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>of</strong> self-reported and others).<br />

The position <strong>of</strong> the stakeholder should be reported from this f<strong>in</strong>al classification.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!