Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...
Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ... Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...
Table E-3 Details of each flow of scenario 1 (continued) No. Description 29 30 Reuse (stocked) industrial plastic waste (2) Landfilling of industrial plastic waste (2) Value (Tonnes/year) 42,479 4,248 211 Assumption and Calculation Assumed that 4% of IPW will be reused or stocked in the manufacturing in 2016. (Not present in the material flow) Assumed that 0.4% of industrial plastic waste was disposed at landfills in 2016. (Not present in the material flow) 31 Industrial plastic waste for industrial incineration (2) 930,283 Assumed that 87.6% of industrial plastic waste (use as fuels) will be burnt in industrial incineration to recovery energy in 2016. (Not present in the material flow) 32 Industrial plastic waste (2) 1,019,489 The amount of industrial plastic wastes was shown in the material flow of scenario 1. IPW (2) = IPW (recycling)+IPW (landfilling)+IPW (incineration) Collection and transportation process 33 Exported municipal plastic waste 198,222 Assumed that 9.5% of thermoplastic wastes will be exported in 2016 34 35 Municipal incineration (Thermosetting) Municipal incineration (Thermoplastic) 422 41,731 36 Total municipal incineration 42,152 37 Industrial incineration (2) 1,860,567 29 Landfilling (Thermosetting) 7,798 30 Landfilling (Thermoplastic) 772,022 Assumed that 2% of thermosetting wastes will be burnt at the incinerators (Not present in the material flow). 1% is from the amount of combusted wastes in the municipal incineration, and 1% is from the waste utilization by energy recovery Assumed that 2% of thermoplastic wastes will be burnt at the incinerators (Not present in the material flow). 1% is from the amount of combusted wastes in the municipal incineration, and 1% is from the waste utilization by energy recovery The summary of wastes to municipal incineration of thermosetting and thermoplastic wastes The summary of wastes for industrial incineration from the manufacturing and plastic consumption processes. Assumed that 37% of thermosetting wastes will disposed at landfills (Not present in the material flow) Assumed that 37% of thermoplastic wastes was disposed at landfills (Not present in the material flow)
Table E-3 Details of each flow of scenario 1 (continued) No. Description Value (Tonnes/year) Assumption and Calculation 31 Total landfilling of MSW 788,316 The summary of landfilling of thermoplastic and thermosetting wastes 32 Stock in landfill 1,181,704 Stock = input of process - output of process 33 Plastic waste for recycling 462,031 Assumed that 14% of thermoplastic wastes will be recycled in 2016. 34 Improper disposed waste (Thermosetting) in MSW 12,856 Assumed that 61% of thermosetting wastes will not disposed properly (Not present in the material flow) 35 Improper disposed waste (Thermoplastic) in MSW 782,454 Assumed that 37.5% of thermoplastic wastes will not disposed properly (Not present in the material flow). 36 Total improper disposed waste 795,311 The summary of improper disposed thermosetting and thermoplastic wastes 37 Stock in environment 1,322,216 Stock = Uncollected waste + Improper disposed waste Municipal incineration process 38 Off-gas (1) from municipal incineration 33,722 Assumed that 80% of municipal plastic waste which is burnt in municipal incineration will become off-gas in 2016. 39 Residue waste (1) from municipal incineration 8,430 Assumed that 20% of municipal plastic waste which is burnt in municipal incineration will become ash in 2016. Industrial incineration process 40 41 42 Industrial incineration (1) (cement) Off-gas (2) from industrial incineration Residue waste (4) from industrial incineration 42,500 1,522,453 372,113 43 Stock in industrial incineration 8,500 This amount was estimated by using 50,000 tonnes/year of RDF production from landfilled wastes multiplying by the numbers of cement factories (5 plants). Assumed that 17% of plastic wastes in landfilled wastes. Assumed that 80% of plastic waste which is burnt in municipal incineration will become off-gas in 2016. Assumed that 20% of total industrial plastic wastes for industrial incineration will become ash after combustion and will be disposed at landfills. Assumed that 20% of plastic waste which is burnt in cement kiln will become ash in 2016 and be used as material substitution. 212
- Page 169 and 170: C.3 Case study from zero baht shop
- Page 171 and 172: Figure C-24 Newspaper Figure C-26 M
- Page 173 and 174: 3. Activities of Zero Baht Shop On
- Page 175 and 176: Zero Baht Shop depending on the tot
- Page 177 and 178: Figure C-37 Lecturer of the project
- Page 179 and 180: networks. This project is not widel
- Page 181 and 182: C.4 Case study from Sai Mai transfe
- Page 183 and 184: 4. Categorizing of waste Waste from
- Page 185 and 186: 6. Environment issues and observati
- Page 187 and 188: C.5 Technology Park of Chulalongkor
- Page 189 and 190: fractions. It utilizes the heat fro
- Page 191 and 192: ates and desorption inside capillar
- Page 193 and 194: Appendix D Material Flow Analysis D
- Page 195 and 196: Table D-1 Amounts of plastic waste
- Page 197 and 198: D.2 Calculation of the material flo
- Page 199 and 200: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 201 and 202: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 203 and 204: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 205 and 206: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 207 and 208: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 209 and 210: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 211 and 212: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 213 and 214: Table D-2 Details of calculation of
- Page 215 and 216: Table D-3 Percentage of industrial
- Page 217 and 218: E.3 Calculation of plastic flows in
- Page 219: Table E-3 Details of each flow of s
- Page 223 and 224: E.4 The estimation of imported and
- Page 225 and 226: Table E-7 Details of each flow of s
- Page 227 and 228: Table E-7 Details of each flow of s
- Page 229 and 230: Table E-7 Details of each flow of s
- Page 231 and 232: Table E-8 Details of each flow of s
- Page 233 and 234: Table E-8 Details of each flow of s
- Page 235 and 236: Table E-8 Details of each flow of s
- Page 237 and 238: Table E-9 Details of each flow of s
- Page 239 and 240: Table E-9 Details of each flow of s
- Page 241 and 242: Table E-9 Details of each flow of s
Table E-3 Details <strong>of</strong> each flow <strong>of</strong> scenario 1 (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />
No. Description<br />
Value<br />
(Tonnes/year)<br />
Assumption and Calculation<br />
31 Total landfill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> MSW 788,316 The summary <strong>of</strong> landfill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> thermoplastic and thermosett<strong>in</strong>g wastes<br />
32 Stock <strong>in</strong> landfill 1,181,704 Stock = <strong>in</strong>put <strong>of</strong> process - output <strong>of</strong> process<br />
33 <strong>Plastic</strong> waste for recycl<strong>in</strong>g 462,031 Assumed that 14% <strong>of</strong> thermoplastic wastes will be recycled <strong>in</strong> 2016.<br />
34<br />
Improper disposed waste<br />
(Thermosett<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> MSW<br />
12,856<br />
Assumed that 61% <strong>of</strong> thermosett<strong>in</strong>g wastes will not disposed properly (Not present <strong>in</strong><br />
the material flow)<br />
35<br />
Improper disposed waste<br />
(Thermoplastic) <strong>in</strong> MSW<br />
782,454<br />
Assumed that 37.5% <strong>of</strong> thermoplastic wastes will not disposed properly (Not present<br />
<strong>in</strong> the material flow).<br />
36 Total improper disposed waste 795,311 The summary <strong>of</strong> improper disposed thermosett<strong>in</strong>g and thermoplastic wastes<br />
37 Stock <strong>in</strong> environment 1,322,216 Stock = Uncollected waste + Improper disposed waste<br />
Municipal <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration process<br />
38<br />
Off-gas (1) from municipal<br />
<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
33,722<br />
Assumed that 80% <strong>of</strong> municipal plastic waste which is burnt <strong>in</strong> municipal <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
will become <strong>of</strong>f-gas <strong>in</strong> 2016.<br />
39<br />
Residue waste (1) from municipal<br />
<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
8,430<br />
Assumed that 20% <strong>of</strong> municipal plastic waste which is burnt <strong>in</strong> municipal <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
will become ash <strong>in</strong> 2016.<br />
Industrial <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration process<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
Industrial <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration (1)<br />
(cement)<br />
Off-gas (2) from <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
Residue waste (4) from <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
42,500<br />
1,522,453<br />
372,113<br />
43 Stock <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration 8,500<br />
This amount was estimated by us<strong>in</strong>g 50,000 tonnes/year <strong>of</strong> RDF production from<br />
landfilled wastes multiply<strong>in</strong>g by the numbers <strong>of</strong> cement factories (5 plants). Assumed<br />
that 17% <strong>of</strong> plastic wastes <strong>in</strong> landfilled wastes.<br />
Assumed that 80% <strong>of</strong> plastic waste which is burnt <strong>in</strong> municipal <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration will<br />
become <strong>of</strong>f-gas <strong>in</strong> 2016.<br />
Assumed that 20% <strong>of</strong> total <strong>in</strong>dustrial plastic wastes for <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration will<br />
become ash after combustion and will be disposed at landfills.<br />
Assumed that 20% <strong>of</strong> plastic waste which is burnt <strong>in</strong> cement kiln will become ash <strong>in</strong><br />
2016 and be used as material substitution.<br />
212
Change language