Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ... Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management in Thailand Using Material ...

faculty.ait.ac.th
from faculty.ait.ac.th More from this publisher
28.08.2013 Views

5. From the material flow analysis, the existing account of plastic waste management was observed. The municipal plastic waste generation was found to be of 2.58 million tonnes in 2010. The amount of thermoplastic and thermosetting waste generation within MPW was 2.55 million tonnes and 25,771 tonnes respectively. Approximately 14% of thus collected municipal plastic waste was recycled in 2010, whereas 37% of these wastes was disposed at landfills. 15,330 tonnes of landfilled plastic wastes which was used by 7 plastic to oil recovery plants. 2% of municipal plastic wastes was burnt in three municipal incineration plants. A huge amount of nearly 1.39 million tonnes of municipal plastic waste was dispersed into the open environment. 6. As far as the industrial plastic waste goes, approximately 87.6% was co-incinerated at the industrial incineration facilities, while 8% of industrial plastic wastes was recycled. Only 0.4% of industrial plastic wastes was disposed at landfills in 2010. 7. Three different plastic waste management scenarios were proposed to predict the plastic waste management in the year 2016. Scenario 1 was the business as usual (BAU), scenario 2 was the increment of plastic recycling rate to 30%, and third scenario explored the case of plastic waste to energy generation as one of the plastic waste management options. Scenario 1 showed the amount of municipal plastic waste generation will increase by 2.63 million tonnes in 2016. The amount of plastic production will rise to 5.94 million tonnes in 2016. 8. The second scenario anticipated the recycling rate to increase to 30%, following the National Environmental Quality Control Plan (2012-2016). This scenario was divided into 2 parts such as scenario 2A and scenario 2B, and these scenarios based on the 3Rs law to reduce amount of waste generation and the enforcement of plastic bag taxation scheme to lower consumption of plastic bags. The percentage of recycling rate in 2016 will change from 14% of municipal recycling rate and 8% of industrial recycling rate in 2010 to 30% of plastic recycling rate. The amount of recycled product generation will be 1.28 million tonnes in 2016. 9. For scenario 2B, around 40% of municipal plastic wastes will be disposed at landfill, whereas 59% of industrial plastic wastes will be burnt at the industrial incineration. For scenario 2A, the percentage of municipal plastic waste for landfilling will be equal to 30%, and approximately 8% of municipal plastic waste will be disposed in open environment. Furthermore, the percentage of municipal incineration will be the same as in 2010 (2%). Similarly, the amounts of plastic to oil and landfilled waste to RDF will not change in 2016. 10. The last scenario presented that 10% of municipal plastic wastes will be incinerated at both municipal and industrial incineration facilities. The percentages of municipal plastic waste recycling and landfilling will be 14% and 37% respectively. However, the amount of industrial plastic waste utilization at industrial incineration facilities will be the same as in 2010 (87.6%). The amounts of RDF production from landfilled wastes and fresh plastic to oil in 2016 will be 0.3 and 0.23 million tonnes respectively. Finally, the numbers of plastic to oil plants will increase by 30 plants in 2016. 97

11. A simple revenue-expenditure analysis of each scenario was also conducted to present the cost-benefit implications. The scenario 1 estimated a 7.82 trillion Baht of expenditure to be spent in collection and disposal of plastic waste generated in the year 2016. The expenditures of the scenario 2 and scenario 3 will be 5.4 and 11 trillion Baht respectively. The revenue gain from the sale of recycled products (materials and energy), waste collection fees, was also estimated. The highest potential revenue in the scenario 3 was the highest, amounting 8,346 million Baht in 2016. While, the increase in recycling rate by 30% will make private sectors in scenario 2 gain 6,162 million Baht of revenue. Finally, the revenue of the scenario 1 will be 2,554 million Baht in 2016. 12. Level of public awareness and public opinion on the elements of proposed scenarios were also explored as one of the factors to evaluate the success of plastic waste management scenarios. Out of 125 respondents, only 12.8% were positive on the plastic bag charge in department stores and minimarts. Approximately 90.4% and 88% of 125 samples showed their approval to use the biodegradable and recycled plastics respectively. 60% of the respondents were positive about promotion and development of waste to energy schemes as one of the management options to tackle plastic waste. When asked about the ban over use of plastic bags over 45% agreed to it. 13. Many relevant stakeholders (government, semi-government, private sector, NGOs, and their network, etc.) were identified. Stakeholders like waste generators, waste collectors, waste shops, waste recyclers, government organizations, private sector organizations and public-private partnership institutions and their level of importance and influence was evaluated in order to understand each of their roles and stakes in designing a successful plastic waste management system. It was observed that both mandatory and voluntary involvement of these relevant stakeholders is required to achieve the goal of better plastic waste management in Thailand. The above conclusions and recommendations are drawn from author’s familiarization of the issues on plastic waste, field observation, interactions and discussions with key stakeholders, and the key processes of plastic waste management (with specific attention to plastic waste recycling processes). The recommendations are addressed to all relevant actors that have stake in plastic waste generation and management, including policy makers, plastic manufacturers, plastic waste management/recycling industries, environmental organizations etc. 5.2 Recommendations for Future Work Plastic waste management is an extensive process. It therefore requires further research in order to understand the subject matter in better ways with more accurate and reliable data. Following are few of the areas scoped for future research: 1. A detailed technology assessment of the available plastic waste recycling technologies in Thailand can give the actual picture of the recycling capacity. This study can further support whether the scenario 2 proposed in this study (i.e., increasing recycling rate to 30%) will be possible or not from the technology point of view. Such study can provide the options for best available technology (BAT) or 98

11. A simple revenue-expenditure analysis <strong>of</strong> each scenario was also conducted to<br />

present the cost-benefit implications. The scenario 1 estimated a 7.82 trillion Baht<br />

<strong>of</strong> expenditure to be spent <strong>in</strong> collection and disposal <strong>of</strong> plastic waste generated <strong>in</strong><br />

the year 2016. The expenditures <strong>of</strong> the scenario 2 and scenario 3 will be 5.4 and 11<br />

trillion Baht respectively. The revenue ga<strong>in</strong> from the sale <strong>of</strong> recycled products<br />

(materials and energy), waste collection fees, was also estimated. The highest<br />

potential revenue <strong>in</strong> the scenario 3 was the highest, amount<strong>in</strong>g 8,346 million Baht<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2016. While, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g rate by 30% will make private sectors <strong>in</strong><br />

scenario 2 ga<strong>in</strong> 6,162 million Baht <strong>of</strong> revenue. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the revenue <strong>of</strong> the scenario<br />

1 will be 2,554 million Baht <strong>in</strong> 2016.<br />

12. Level <strong>of</strong> public awareness and public op<strong>in</strong>ion on the elements <strong>of</strong> proposed<br />

scenarios were also explored as one <strong>of</strong> the factors to evaluate the success <strong>of</strong> plastic<br />

waste management scenarios. Out <strong>of</strong> 125 respondents, only 12.8% were positive on<br />

the plastic bag charge <strong>in</strong> department stores and m<strong>in</strong>imarts. Approximately 90.4%<br />

and 88% <strong>of</strong> 125 samples showed their approval to use the biodegradable and<br />

recycled plastics respectively. 60% <strong>of</strong> the respondents were positive about<br />

promotion and development <strong>of</strong> waste to energy schemes as one <strong>of</strong> the management<br />

options to tackle plastic waste. When asked about the ban over use <strong>of</strong> plastic bags<br />

over 45% agreed to it.<br />

13. Many relevant stakeholders (government, semi-government, private sector, NGOs,<br />

and their network, etc.) were identified. Stakeholders like waste generators, waste<br />

collectors, waste shops, waste recyclers, government organizations, private sector<br />

organizations and public-private partnership <strong>in</strong>stitutions and their level <strong>of</strong><br />

importance and <strong>in</strong>fluence was evaluated <strong>in</strong> order to understand each <strong>of</strong> their roles<br />

and stakes <strong>in</strong> design<strong>in</strong>g a successful plastic waste management system. It was<br />

observed that both mandatory and voluntary <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> these relevant<br />

stakeholders is required to achieve the goal <strong>of</strong> better plastic waste management <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Thailand</strong>.<br />

The above conclusions and recommendations are drawn from author’s familiarization <strong>of</strong><br />

the issues on plastic waste, field observation, <strong>in</strong>teractions and discussions with key<br />

stakeholders, and the key processes <strong>of</strong> plastic waste management (with specific attention to<br />

plastic waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g processes). The recommendations are addressed to all relevant<br />

actors that have stake <strong>in</strong> plastic waste generation and management, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g policy<br />

makers, plastic manufacturers, plastic waste management/recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries,<br />

environmental organizations etc.<br />

5.2 Recommendations for Future Work<br />

<strong>Plastic</strong> waste management is an extensive process. It therefore requires further research <strong>in</strong><br />

order to understand the subject matter <strong>in</strong> better ways with more accurate and reliable data.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g are few <strong>of</strong> the areas scoped for future research:<br />

1. A detailed technology assessment <strong>of</strong> the available plastic waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Thailand</strong> can give the actual picture <strong>of</strong> the recycl<strong>in</strong>g capacity. This<br />

study can further support whether the scenario 2 proposed <strong>in</strong> this study (i.e.,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g recycl<strong>in</strong>g rate to 30%) will be possible or not from the technology po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>of</strong> view. Such study can provide the options for best available technology (BAT) or<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!