Moscovici, S. (1991) La f<strong>in</strong> des représentations sociales?, pp. 65-84, <strong>in</strong> V. Aebischer, J.P. Deconchy and R. Lipiansky, Idéologies et répresentations sociales, Del Val, Fribourg. Moscovici, S. (1992) <strong>The</strong> Psychology <strong>of</strong> Scientific Myths, pp. 3-9, <strong>in</strong> M. von Cranach, W. Doise and G. Mugny (eds) Social Representations and <strong>the</strong> Social Bases <strong>of</strong> Knowledge. Lewiston : Hogrefe and Huber. Moscovici, S. (1994) "Social representations and pragmatic communication" Social Science Informations, 33 (2): 163-177. Moscovici, S. (1998) <strong>The</strong> history and actuality <strong>of</strong> social representations, <strong>in</strong> U. Flick (Ed.) <strong>The</strong> Psychology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Moscovici, S. & Markova, I. (2000) Ideas and <strong>the</strong>ir developmentt: a dialogue between Serge moscovici and Ivana Markova In G. Duveen (ed.) S. Moscovici , Social Representations. Exploration <strong>in</strong> Social Psychology, Cambridge, Polity Press, p. 224- 286 Moscovici, S. & Vignaux, G. (2000) <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>mata <strong>in</strong> G. Duveen (ed.) S. Moscovici , Social Representations. Exploration <strong>in</strong> Social Psychology, Cambridge, Polity Press, p. 156- 183 Moscovici, S.& Hewstone, M. (1983) “Social representations and social explanations: from <strong>the</strong> 'naive' to <strong>the</strong> 'amateur' scientist”, pp. 98-125, <strong>in</strong> M. Hewstone (ed.). Attribution <strong>The</strong>ory: Social and Functional Extensions., Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Parker, I. (1987) “Social representations: Social Psychology's (Mis)use <strong>of</strong> sociology”, Journal for <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Social Behaviour. 17, 4: 447-470. Parker, I. (1991) Discourse dynamics: critical analyses for social and <strong>in</strong>dividual psychology, London: Routledge. Parker, I. (1994) Reflexive research and <strong>the</strong> ground<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: social psychology and <strong>the</strong> psy-complex, Journal <strong>of</strong> Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4, p. 239-252. Parker, I. & Burman, E. (1993) Aga<strong>in</strong>st discursive imperialism, empiricism and constructionism: thirty-two problems with <strong>discourse</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>, In E. Burman and I. Parker (eds) Discourse analytic Research: repertoires and read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> texts <strong>in</strong> action, London, Routledge. Potter, J. (1988) What is reflexive about discorse <strong>analysis</strong>? <strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>g. In S. Woolgar (eds.) Knowledge and Reflexivitity: new frontiera <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> socioogy <strong>of</strong> knowledge. London, Sage. Potter, J. (1992) Objectivity as standardisation: <strong>the</strong> rethoric <strong>of</strong> impersonalità <strong>in</strong> mesaurement statistics, and cost-benefit <strong>analysis</strong>, Annals <strong>of</strong> scholarship, 9: 19-59. Potter, J. (1996) Represent<strong>in</strong>g Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and social construction, London, Sage. Potter, J. & Billig, M. (1992) Re-present<strong>in</strong>g representations, Ongo<strong>in</strong>g Production on Social Representations, 1, 15-20. Potter, J. & Edwards, D. (1999) Social representations and discursive psychology: from cognition to action, Culture & Psychology, vol. 5(4), 447-458. Potter, J. & Litton, I. (1985) Some problems underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> social representations, British Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychology, 34, pp. 81-90. Potter, J. & We<strong>the</strong>rell, M. (1987) Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London, Sage. Potter, J. & We<strong>the</strong>rell, M. (1998) Social representations, <strong>discourse</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> and racism, In. U. Flick (Ed.), <strong>The</strong> Psychology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Purkhardt, S.C. (1993) Transform<strong>in</strong>g social representations . A social psychology <strong>of</strong> common sense and science. London and New York: Routledge. Rommetveit, R. (1984) “<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation and transmission <strong>of</strong> social representations”, pp. 331-359, <strong>in</strong> R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds) Social Representations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Rouquette, M.L. (1994) Sur la connaissence des masses: essai de psychologie politique, Grenoble, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. Rose, N. (1985) <strong>The</strong> psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society <strong>in</strong> England 1869-1939, Routledge and Kegan Shlenker, B.R. (1974) Social Psychology and science, , Journal <strong>of</strong> Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1-15. Smith, A.H. (2001) Le rappresentazioni sociali paradossali, Roma, Gangemi. Sommer C.M. (1998) Social representations and media communication . In U. FLICK (1998) <strong>The</strong> psychology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Still, A. & Costall, A. (eda.) (1991) Aga<strong>in</strong>st cognitivism. Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology Harvester Wheatsheaf: London. Triandis, H.C. (1989) Self and social behavior <strong>in</strong> different cultural context, Psychological Review, 96, 269- 289. Wagner, W. (1993) “Can Representations expla<strong>in</strong> Social Behavior? A Discussion <strong>of</strong> social representations as Rational System”, Papers on Social Representations, 2(3): 236-249. 46
Wagner, W. (1998) Social representations and beyond: brute facts, symbolic cop<strong>in</strong>g and domesticated worlds, Culture & Psychology, 4, 3, 297-330. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., <strong>The</strong>mel, M. & Verma, J. (1999) <strong>The</strong> modernization <strong>of</strong> tradition: Th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about madness <strong>in</strong> Patna, Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 413-445. Zajonc, R. B. (1960) <strong>The</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> cognitive tun<strong>in</strong>g and communication, J. Abnormal Social Pscychology, 61: 159-67. Zajonc, R.B. (1968) Attitud<strong>in</strong>al Effects <strong>of</strong> Mere Exposure, Journal <strong>of</strong> Personality and Social Psychology, supplemento vol. 9: 1-27 Zajonc, R.B. (1989) Styles <strong>of</strong> explanation <strong>in</strong> social psychology, European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Psychology, 19, 345-368. Zajonc, R.B. & Adelman, 1987 Cognition and communication: a story <strong>of</strong> missed opportunities. Soc. Science Information, 26:3-30. Zajonc, R.B. & Markus, H. (1982) Affective and Cognitive Factors <strong>in</strong> Preferences, Journal <strong>of</strong> Consumer Research , 9 (September): 341-52. 47
- Page 1 and 2: EAESP SMALL GROUP MEETING Theory an
- Page 3 and 4: A scientific dialogue or monologue?
- Page 5 and 6: potential for contributing to a soc
- Page 7 and 8: identified with the discursive prac
- Page 9 and 10: The misunderstanding of the Moscovi
- Page 11 and 12: “monologue”, nor “dialogue st
- Page 13 and 14: The auto-confutation of radical rel
- Page 15 and 16: Sherrard, 1991; Marks, 1993, Figuer
- Page 17 and 18: It is undeniable that the articulat
- Page 19 and 20: The subject's role in a radical "co
- Page 21 and 22: of any structure intra-individual h
- Page 23 and 24: The "totalising" and "reifying" rol
- Page 25 and 26: No Communication without Representa
- Page 27 and 28: transferring messages occurs on the
- Page 29 and 30: The refusal of the communication co
- Page 31 and 32: Pol-lu-tion, s. Effect of defilemen
- Page 33 and 34: "Monological" versus "dialogical" p
- Page 35 and 36: Although the role of the action and
- Page 37 and 38: RDA, and even more the conversation
- Page 39 and 40: And even before in Arguing and Thin
- Page 41 and 42: Conclusion 41
- Page 43 and 44: Augoustionos, M. , Innes, J.M. (199
- Page 45: Jodelet, D. (1991) “L’idéologi