26.08.2013 Views

GM crops: Reaping the benefits, but not in Europe - Europabio

GM crops: Reaping the benefits, but not in Europe - Europabio

GM crops: Reaping the benefits, but not in Europe - Europabio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

8. REGULATORY COSTS<br />

The average cost for hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>GM</strong>Os approved <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> has been estimated at ¤7-10 million 46 per event.<br />

These costs ma<strong>in</strong>ly accrue from <strong>the</strong> large number of studies which <strong>the</strong> applicant companies have to<br />

present to EFSA. The 30 approvals (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g for imports) hav<strong>in</strong>g been granted by April 2011 represent<br />

total costs to companies of between ¤210 and 300 million. This does <strong>not</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> costs for <strong>the</strong><br />

73 <strong>GM</strong> products which were <strong>in</strong> different stages of <strong>the</strong> approval system <strong>in</strong> April 2011.<br />

Indirect costs result from unpredictable timel<strong>in</strong>es, which can take up to 13 years for <strong>GM</strong> cultivation<br />

applications and 47 months for import applications, as well as frequent, sometimes retroactive,<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirements. For example, for dossiers submitted <strong>in</strong> 1998, EFSA was still ask<strong>in</strong>g<br />

new questions <strong>in</strong> 2011. With equally thorough requirements, yet swifter approvals <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts of<br />

<strong>the</strong> world, and an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g backlog <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>, <strong>the</strong> result is an uneven play<strong>in</strong>g field for companies.<br />

Some ideas to improve this situation are be<strong>in</strong>g discussed.<br />

9. CONCLUSIONS<br />

1. Wherever <strong>the</strong>y are allowed to, millions of farmers choose to cultivate <strong>GM</strong> <strong>crops</strong>.<br />

They derive socio-economic <strong>benefits</strong> from <strong>the</strong>ir use. If farmers did <strong>not</strong> get a suitable return,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would <strong>not</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue to cultivate <strong>GM</strong>.<br />

2. Higher productivity on <strong>the</strong> same amount of land is an important contri<strong>but</strong>ion to susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

agriculture. O<strong>the</strong>r large scale environmental <strong>benefits</strong> of <strong>GM</strong> <strong>crops</strong> have been proven and<br />

documented widely.<br />

3. <strong>Europe</strong>an farmers choose to cultivate <strong>GM</strong> <strong>crops</strong> where <strong>the</strong>y are allowed to and where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

benefit from <strong>the</strong>ir use. With EU cultivation limited ma<strong>in</strong>ly to Bt maize, it is clear that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>benefits</strong> are limited to regions most affected by <strong>the</strong> target pest, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an corn borer.<br />

4. <strong>Europe</strong>an farmers are miss<strong>in</strong>g economic opportunities worth between ¤443 to<br />

¤929 million each year.<br />

5. <strong>Europe</strong> is dependent on gra<strong>in</strong> imports, most of which are <strong>GM</strong>. A slow approval process<br />

and trade barriers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> make imports of <strong>GM</strong> products more expensive and could result <strong>in</strong><br />

major trade disruptions.<br />

6. Many new <strong>crops</strong> are rapidly be<strong>in</strong>g developed and authorised around <strong>the</strong> world. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s Jo<strong>in</strong>t Research Centre, <strong>the</strong> number of commercial <strong>GM</strong> <strong>crops</strong> is set<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease to 120 or more by 2015. As new <strong>crops</strong> are released, which may <strong>in</strong>clude salt tolerant,<br />

drought tolerant, nitrogen efficient and nutritionally enhanced varieties, it seems unlikely that<br />

<strong>the</strong> EU can reasonably cont<strong>in</strong>ue with its current approach.<br />

7. Socio-economic factors can<strong>not</strong> be taken <strong>in</strong>to account when approv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>GM</strong> <strong>crops</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!