Observations concerning… - EURL | Residues of Pesticides

Observations concerning… - EURL | Residues of Pesticides Observations concerning… - EURL | Residues of Pesticides

eurl.pesticides.eu
from eurl.pesticides.eu More from this publisher
25.08.2013 Views

Observations concerning… a compound EU Reference Laboratory for Pesticides Requiring Single Residue Methods CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany EURL@cvuas.bwl.de a matrix a method other Use of Analyte Protectants in GC-Analysis a way to improve peak shape and reduce decomposition of susceptible compounds Reported by: EURL-SRM Version 1 (last update: 22.04.2013) Brief description of problem/observation/solution: The GC-analysis of various pesticides is quite problematic due to unwanted tailing and decomposition phenomena. Both phenomena are related to active sites on the surface of the GC-system and become more pronounced the more contaminated the GC-system becomes. Replacing the liner and cutting the first part of the column are only temporary measures as new non-volatile components from the injected extracts are deposited forming new active sites. Analyte protectants (APs) help to reduce analyte tailing and decomposition within the GC-Inlet by masking these active sites. This effect is also called “matrix-induced signal enhancement”. Most effective as APs are compounds entailing multiple hydroxyl-groups with which they can effectively interact with the active sites via hydrogen bonds. To be effective APs have to be added to solutions (e.g. extracts, standard solutions) at concentration by far exceeding those of the analytes to be protected. In many cases the protective effect exhibited by APs is stronger than that of matrix components. With this in mind APs are added to both calibration solutions in solvent and sample extracts to equalize the protective potential, thus obviating the need for matrix-matched calibrations. APs are often employed as a mixture of compounds each covering a different volatility range. Fig 1: Typical APs: H O H O Ethyl glycerol O H Sorbitol O H O H O H O O H O H O H O H O Shikimic acid O H O H O O H ( E ) O O H O H O H d - Gluconolactone Page 1- 2 -

<strong>Observations</strong> <strong>concerning…</strong><br />

a compound<br />

EU Reference Laboratory for <strong>Pesticides</strong> Requiring Single Residue Methods<br />

CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany<br />

<strong>EURL</strong>@cvuas.bwl.de<br />

a matrix a method other<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> Analyte Protectants in GC-Analysis<br />

a way to improve peak shape<br />

and reduce decomposition <strong>of</strong> susceptible compounds<br />

Reported by: <strong>EURL</strong>-SRM<br />

Version 1 (last update: 22.04.2013)<br />

Brief description <strong>of</strong> problem/observation/solution:<br />

The GC-analysis <strong>of</strong> various pesticides is quite problematic due to unwanted tailing and decomposition<br />

phenomena. Both phenomena are related to active sites on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

GC-system and become more pronounced the more contaminated the GC-system becomes.<br />

Replacing the liner and cutting the first part <strong>of</strong> the column are only temporary measures as<br />

new non-volatile components from the injected extracts are deposited forming new active<br />

sites. Analyte protectants (APs) help to reduce analyte tailing and decomposition within the<br />

GC-Inlet by masking these active sites. This effect is also called “matrix-induced signal enhancement”.<br />

Most effective as APs are compounds entailing multiple hydroxyl-groups with<br />

which they can effectively interact with the active sites via hydrogen bonds. To be effective<br />

APs have to be added to solutions (e.g. extracts, standard solutions) at concentration by far<br />

exceeding those <strong>of</strong> the analytes to be protected. In many cases the protective effect exhibited<br />

by APs is stronger than that <strong>of</strong> matrix components. With this in mind APs are added to both<br />

calibration solutions in solvent and sample extracts to equalize the protective potential, thus<br />

obviating the need for matrix-matched calibrations. APs are <strong>of</strong>ten employed as a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

compounds each covering a different volatility range.<br />

Fig 1: Typical APs:<br />

H O<br />

H O<br />

Ethyl glycerol<br />

O H<br />

Sorbitol<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O<br />

H O<br />

Shikimic acid<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O<br />

O H<br />

( E )<br />

O<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

O H<br />

d - Gluconolactone<br />

Page 1- 2 -


Fig 2: The AP-principle:<br />

„Degree „Degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> analyte analyte protection”<br />

protection”<br />

Analyte Protectants- Principle<br />

Raw Extract<br />

PSA<br />

cleanup<br />

Cleaned up<br />

Extract<br />

Standard in Pure Solvent<br />

Cleaned-up Extract + AP<br />

Addition <strong>of</strong><br />

„Analyte<br />

Protectants“<br />

(AP)<br />

EU Reference Laboratory for <strong>Pesticides</strong> Requiring Single Residue Methods<br />

CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany<br />

<strong>EURL</strong>@cvuas.bwl.de<br />

Standard<br />

+ AP<br />

APs reduce analyte<br />

interactions with active<br />

sites and thus errors<br />

related to matrix-induced<br />

peak enhancement<br />

phenomena<br />

Figure 3: Equalization <strong>of</strong> matrix effects between a standard in blank extract and a standard<br />

in neat solvent by adding APs to both<br />

Absolute Error [%]<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Dichlorvos<br />

Dichlobenil<br />

Acephate<br />

o-Phenylphenol<br />

Phenmedipham<br />

Carb<strong>of</strong>uran<br />

HCH, gamma-<br />

Chlorothalonil<br />

Errors due to Matrix Effects<br />

with and without Analyte Protectants<br />

Vinclozolin<br />

Parathion-m<br />

Carbaryl<br />

Methiocarb<br />

Dicl<strong>of</strong>luanid<br />

Parathion-e<br />

Chlozolinate<br />

Tolyfluanid<br />

Against Solvent w/o APs<br />

Against solvent with AP<br />

Procymidone<br />

Captan<br />

Folpet<br />

Flubenzimine<br />

Ditalimfos<br />

Bupirimat<br />

Binapacryl<br />

Trifloxystrobin<br />

Tetramethrin1<br />

Dic<strong>of</strong>ol<br />

Acrinathrin<br />

Bitertanol<br />

Iprodione<br />

Chinomethionat<br />

TPP<br />

MEAN ALL<br />

Page 2- 3 -


Copies <strong>of</strong> slides illustrating the AP-principle<br />

„Matrix-Induced Peak Enhancement Effect“<br />

Active Sites (on Surface <strong>of</strong> GC-Liner & Column )<br />

(Siloxanes & deposited non-volatile matrix-co-extractives)<br />

Analytes (interact with Active Sites)<br />

• Unwanted Retention/Tailing<br />

• Quasi-catalysed degradation (susceptible compounds)<br />

Matrix-Components (in Excess)<br />

• Bloc active sites and protect analytes<br />

Analyte: Atrazine ; Matrix: Strawberry<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

RT= 8,80 min<br />

WITH Matrix co-extractives<br />

(Strawberry-Extract)<br />

RT= 8,92 min<br />

EU Reference Laboratory for <strong>Pesticides</strong> Requiring Single Residue Methods<br />

CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany<br />

<strong>EURL</strong>@cvuas.bwl.de<br />

GC-Liner<br />

GC-Capillary<br />

WITHOUT Matrix co-extractives<br />

(in pure solvent)<br />

e.g. Calibration standard<br />

Stronger Tailing<br />

Apex-Shift towards longer RTs!<br />

0<br />

8.70 8.75 8.80 8.85 8.90 8.95 9.00 9.05 9.10 9.15 9.20 9.25 9.30 9.35 9.40 9.45<br />

Ratios:<br />

• Peak-Areas: ~ 1,5:1<br />

Matrix-Induced Peak Enhancement<br />

• Peak-Heights: ~ 4:1<br />

OVERESTIMATION OF RESULTS!!<br />

• Peak-Width (at half height): ~ 1:3<br />

Page 3- 4 -


Instructions for the production and use <strong>of</strong> an AP-mixture:<br />

a) Prepare the solvent:<br />

Solvent A<br />

Acetonitril content<br />

[%-Vol.]<br />

b) Prepare AP stock solutions (store at 4°C):<br />

Sorbitol (CAS Number: 50-70-4)<br />

Sorbitol<br />

[mg]<br />

EU Reference Laboratory for <strong>Pesticides</strong> Requiring Single Residue Methods<br />

CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany<br />

<strong>EURL</strong>@cvuas.bwl.de<br />

Water content<br />

[%-Vol.]<br />

60 40<br />

Solvent A<br />

[mL]<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> stock solution<br />

[mg/mL]<br />

500 10 50<br />

D-(-)Gluconic acid-δ-lactone (CAS Number: 90-80-2)<br />

D-(-)Gluconic acid-δ-lactone Solvent A Concentration <strong>of</strong> stock solution<br />

[mg]<br />

[mL]<br />

[mg/mL]<br />

500 10 50<br />

Shikimic acid (CAS Number: 138-59-0)<br />

Shikimic acid<br />

Solvent A Concentration <strong>of</strong> stock solution<br />

[mg]<br />

[mL]<br />

[mg/mL]<br />

500 10 50<br />

3-Ethoxy-1,2-propanediol (CAS Number: 1874-62-0)<br />

Use pure substance without dilution.<br />

c) Preparation <strong>of</strong> AP-Mixture (use volumetric flask)<br />

1) Weigh 2 g <strong>of</strong> 3-Ethoxy-1,2-propanediol in a 10 mL volumetric flask<br />

2) Add 2 mL D-(-) Gluconic acid-δ-lactone stock solution<br />

3) Add 1 mL Sorbitol stock solution<br />

4) Add 1 mL Shikimic acid stock solution<br />

5) Fill the volumetric flask up to 10 mL with solvent A<br />

d) Spike extracts or standard solutions with AP-mixture<br />

Use 30 µL AP-Mix per mL <strong>of</strong> sample extract or solvent-based calibration solution (30 µL/mL).<br />

Note: Different GC-Systems may require different amounts <strong>of</strong> APs.<br />

Page 4- 5 -


AP-Related Publications:<br />

Papers:<br />

1. M. Anastassiades, K. Maštovská, and S.J. Lehotay J. Chromatogr. A, 1015 (2003) 163-184<br />

2. K. Maštovska, S.J. Lehotay and M. Anastassiades, Anal Chem 77 (2005) 8129<br />

Posters:<br />

1. M. Anastassiades, S. Lehotay, 'Reduction <strong>of</strong> Analyte Degradation and Peak Tailing During GC Injection<br />

by Addition <strong>of</strong> Protecting Agents'<br />

4 th European Pesticide Residue Workshop in Rome/Italy, Awarded as best Poster<br />

2. M. Anastassiades, E. Scherbaum, B. Tasdelen: „Investigations on the use <strong>of</strong> analyte protectants for<br />

multiresidue GC analysis‘<br />

6th European Pesticide Residue Workshop in Corfu/Greece<br />

EU Reference Laboratory for <strong>Pesticides</strong> Requiring Single Residue Methods<br />

CVUA Stuttgart, Schaflandstr. 3/2, 70736 Fellbach, Germany<br />

<strong>EURL</strong>@cvuas.bwl.de<br />

Page 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!