PhDâ€theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft
PhDâ€theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft
PhDâ€theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MEANS‐END COMPREHENSION IN PARROTS: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH<br />
Anastasia Krasheninnikova<br />
anastacia.k@web.de<br />
Research Update<br />
Master thesis, supervised by Dr. Ralf Wanker and Prof. Dr. Jutta Schneider, Department of Biology,<br />
University of Hamburg, Martin‐Luther‐king‐Platz 3, 20146, Hamburg, Germany<br />
Two opposing theories explain the evolutionary history of intelligence. The “adaptive<br />
specialization approach” suggests that differences in the ecological and social problems<br />
faced by a species lead to domain‐specific cognitive abilities. Alternatively, the “general<br />
process view” proposes a broader set of cognitive abilities as a consequence of the evolution<br />
of large brains.<br />
The aim of this study was a comparative approach to test the cognitive abilities of<br />
several distantly related parrot species with a means‐end problem, the string discrimination<br />
paradigm. I have presented subjects with string‐pulling tasks where I have varied the spatial<br />
relationship between the strings, the presence of a reward and the physical contact between<br />
the string and the reward to determine whether the parrots perform differently in cognitive<br />
tasks requiring means‐end comprehension.<br />
The results suggest that the ability to pull the string is a domain‐general capability in<br />
psittacids, but the degree of means‐end comprehension vary according to the different<br />
degree of the social complexity of the tested species. The more complex the social system,<br />
the more advanced the cognitive capabilities. This is the first evidence of the evolutionary<br />
history of certain cognitive skills in parrots and the role that the social complexity may play<br />
in this process.<br />
14