25.08.2013 Views

PhD‐theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft

PhD‐theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft

PhD‐theses - Ethologische Gesellschaft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Content Newsletter No. 64<br />

Content<br />

General Overview .......................................................................................................................2<br />

News from the Council....................................................................................................... 3<br />

A note from the Secretary............................................................................................................3<br />

The Niko Tinbergen Prize 2010 of the Ethological Society................................................... 4<br />

Research Update................................................................................................................ 6<br />

Overview ....................................................................................................................................6<br />

PhD‐theses..................................................................................................................................7<br />

Barbara Fischer...............................................................................................................................7<br />

Alexander Kotrschal .......................................................................................................................8<br />

Claudia A. F. Wascher.....................................................................................................................9<br />

Masters and Diplom theses .......................................................................................................10<br />

lka Bürgener .................................................................................................................................10<br />

Sarah Deventer.............................................................................................................................11<br />

Barbara Gerber.............................................................................................................................12<br />

Nicole Gonswa..............................................................................................................................13<br />

Anastasia Krasheninnikova...........................................................................................................14<br />

Dorothee Kremers........................................................................................................................15<br />

Antje Lembke ...............................................................................................................................16<br />

Anna Müller..................................................................................................................................17<br />

Britta Schindler.............................................................................................................................18<br />

Tilman C. Schneider......................................................................................................................20<br />

Anna Viktoria Schnöll ...................................................................................................................21<br />

Inka Spiller ....................................................................................................................................22<br />

Mieke Titulaer ..............................................................................................................................23<br />

Miriam Waldmann .......................................................................................................................24<br />

Marta Wastavino..........................................................................................................................25<br />

Stefanie Zimmer ...........................................................................................................................26<br />

Activities and Meetings.................................................................................................... 27<br />

Future meetings of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>......................................................................27<br />

Reports from previous conferences...........................................................................................28<br />

Other Meetings.........................................................................................................................30<br />

12 th Conference of the <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> für Primatologie ..................................................................30<br />

Joint Meeting of the Animal Behaviour Society & International Ethological Conference............31<br />

13th Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology................................................32<br />

Grant and promotion opportunities for members .....................................................................33<br />

Niko‐Tinbergen‐award..................................................................................................................33<br />

Research funds .............................................................................................................................34<br />

Workshops and graduate student meetings ................................................................................34<br />

Grants for travel subsidies............................................................................................................34<br />

Officers of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>.......................................................................... 35<br />

Council......................................................................................................................................35<br />

Extended Council .......................................................................................................................35<br />

Animal Ethics Commissioners.....................................................................................................36<br />

Teaching Commissioner .............................................................................................................36<br />

Internet Links................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Miscellaneous.................................................................................................................. 38<br />

Your contact details ...................................................................................................................38<br />

1


General Overview<br />

Internals • General information for members (council reports, funding opportunities, etc)<br />

Activities and Meetings • This section provides information about meetings and activities of<br />

the EG, and about other meetings for those interested in animal behaviour. Those who<br />

organize a meeting or for other reasons would like to highlight an upcoming meeting should<br />

contact the secretary prior to deadline for the next Etho News. Given the numbers of<br />

different meetings, not all will be automatically included in Etho News.<br />

Portrait • In short articles of diverse formats (Biography, Interview, Laudation) members can<br />

discuss scientists and their work in the contexts of promotion, special honours or retirement.<br />

Events • In this category members can introduce scheduled projects and report about<br />

events (e.g. meetings) that already took place.<br />

Books • In this section new publications are introduced that are of interest to those<br />

interested in animal behavior. If you would like to drawn attention to a book or wrote book,<br />

please send a short book review; up to one page is sufficient. Please include additional<br />

information such as title, author, publisher, price and further general information.<br />

Research Update • This section is particularly relevant for young members of the society.<br />

You have the opportunity to present an abstract of your masters, Diplom, or PhD thesis or<br />

other research activities. Please remember that at least one person involved must be a<br />

member of the Ethological society (so either the student or one of the advisors). Summaries<br />

must fit on one page and should be submitted WITHOUT ANY SPECIAL FORMAT. Please<br />

provide information in the following order:<br />

Title<br />

Your name<br />

Your email<br />

Type of work supervised by , Institutional address;<br />

Text, followed by references (if adequate) and respective internet links.<br />

Discussion, Perspectives, Letters to the Secretary • This section offers space for<br />

suggestions, criticism and thought‐provoking ideas and visions that may still be callow. Short<br />

and to the point they should initiate discussion between the members (maximum of 2<br />

pages).<br />

Editorial Deadline: 31 st April 2011 Please send your contributions as e‐mail attachments<br />

(.doc or .rtf; not as pdf!) to: claudia.fichtel@gwdg.de<br />

Please check attachments for macro viruses before sending!!!


News from the Council<br />

A note from the Secretary<br />

News from the Council<br />

Dear colleagues, Göttingen, 22.12.2010<br />

the second issue of Etho News in 2010 again includes a number of abstracts from Master‐,<br />

and Diploma‐theses, conferences and the activities within the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>. We<br />

would like to thank those members who provided contributions to this issue.<br />

At this point I would like again to encourage young scientists to submit applications<br />

for the research grants. The deadline is January 01. 2011. Please submit your application to<br />

Dr. Sylvia Kaiser (kaisesy[a]uni‐muenster.de). For details about the application procedure see<br />

http://www.ethol‐ges.org/advancement/others.aspx.<br />

Lastly, I would like to draw your attention to the 6 th Topical Meeting of the<br />

<strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>, 17. ‐19. February in Zürich, Switzerland. This meeting will be<br />

organized by Prof. Dr. Barabara König and Prof. Dr. Redouan Bshary. The next membership<br />

meeting will take place at this conference on 18.02.2011. For details see:<br />

http://www.ecbb2010.org/<br />

Hope to see you all in Zürich!!!<br />

I whish you all a merry Christmas and a happy New Year!<br />

Claudia Fichtel<br />

Secretary of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

3


THE NIKO TINBERGEN PRIZE 2010 OF THE ETHOLOGICAL SOCIETY<br />

News from Members<br />

The Niko Tinbergen Prize 2010 of the Ethological Society was awarded to Dr Katharina<br />

Hirschenhauser, currently based at the University of Vienna and the Max‐Planck Institute for<br />

Ornithology, Seewiesen. Dr. Hirschenhauser has earned a solid reputation in behavioral<br />

endocrinology. Her key contributions include both empirical studies and meta‐analyses. The<br />

ceremony took place at the ECBB conference in Ferrara.<br />

Some comments from committee members who supported her candidature. Katharina<br />

Hirschenhauser was selected by a commission “because of her broad scientific interest, her<br />

scientific independence and her many, good publications.” Being able to develop her<br />

personal research profile as a post doc, “she depended on competitive grants during all that<br />

time. Such a career requires applying for grants practically all the time and involves maximal<br />

flexibility in the face of high financial insecurity. Only very determined and dedicated<br />

researchers would not lose faith on the way.”<br />

Some key papers of Dr. Hirschenhauser:<br />

Hirschenhauser, K., Weiß, B.M., Haberl, W., Möstl, E. and Kotrschal, K.: Female androgen<br />

patterns and within‐pair testosterone compatibility in domestic geese (Anser domesticus).<br />

Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165, 195‐203 (2010)<br />

Hirschenhauser K., Wittek M., Johnston P. and Möstl E.: Social context rather than behavioral<br />

output or winning modulates postconflict testosterone responses in Japanese quail (Coturnix<br />

japonica). Physiol. Behav. 95, 457‐463 (2008)<br />

Hirschenhauser K. and Oliveira R.F.: Social modulation of androgens in male vertebrates:<br />

meta‐analyses of the "challenge hypothesis". Anim. Behav. 71, 265‐277 (2006)<br />

Wit friendly greetings<br />

Reduouan Bshary<br />

Dr. Hirschenhauser and Prof. Dr. Bshary (fighting with the flower wrapping … practice may help<br />

Mr. President ) during the ceremony of the Tinbergen award 2010.<br />

4


Abstract of Dr. Hirschenhauser’s Tinbergen Prize lecture at Ferrara<br />

News from Members<br />

HORMONES AS COORDINATORS AND FACILITATORS OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, EXCITEMENT<br />

AND SUCCESS<br />

Katharina Hirschenhauser<br />

khirschenhauser@orn.mpg.de<br />

MPI for Ornithology, Dept. Behavioural Neurobiology, Seewiesen, Germany<br />

Social interactions may provoke changes of a wide array of hormones, activate different<br />

neuronal circuits and gene expression. Testosterone (T), the major sex steroid of male<br />

vertebrates, has been particularly well studied. On top of seasonally regulated patterns,<br />

short‐term T surges of variable magnitude may occur in response to social encounters. The<br />

degree of T responsiveness was shown to vary with social system, i.e. larger T responses in<br />

males from monogamous than in polygynous bird species (“challenge hypothesis). Thus,<br />

seasonal T levels are a function of the social environment. Meanwhile the phenomenon has<br />

been extended to males of all vertebrate taxa. However, despite the taxonomic breadth its<br />

functions remain puzzling. At the heart of analysis, time‐scale matters and I will present<br />

examples for the social modulation of T at both levels: (a) based on seasonal T patterns, the<br />

hormonal partner compatibility in geese as example for T acting as coordinator of social<br />

behaviour, pairbond maintenance and reproductive success; (b) immediate hormone<br />

changes may be viewed as facilitators of (future) behaviour and success, e.g. T surges in<br />

winners but not losers of a fight. Yet, in fish and quail mirror‐elicited fighting behaviour was<br />

dissociated from T. Recent evidence suggests that an individual perception of fighting vigour,<br />

both own and opponent’s, seems to activate the expression of a T surge rather than winning<br />

or losing itself. Why engage T when social experience alone would be sufficient for inducing<br />

the winner effect? Tests with quail reveal that T‐responsiveness is involved by facilitating<br />

behaviours affecting a “winner’s attitude” and thus, the mutual assessment. Currently, I<br />

focus on the ability to recall social information for future encounters. In sum, studying the<br />

social modulation of hormones may contribute to our understanding of the fine‐tuning<br />

mechanisms of social behaviour and “attitude”, the excitement of conflict, and when it pays<br />

to invest. Funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung.<br />

5


Research Update<br />

Overview<br />

PhD‐theses<br />

Research Update<br />

Fischer, Barbara: Evolution of plastic life‐histories<br />

Kotrschal, Alexander: The influence of early environment on later life – physiology,<br />

behaviour and evolution<br />

Wascher, Claudia A. F.: Heart‐rate in greylag geese (Anser anser): implications for the study<br />

of social systems<br />

Masters and Diplom theses<br />

Bürgener, Ika: The acoustic recognition system of wild boars (Sus scrofa)<br />

Deventer, Sarah: Sexual cannibalism: what do males have to offer?<br />

Gerber, Barbara: The influence of female body condition and predator threat on the brood<br />

care behaviour of mouthbreeding cichlids<br />

Gonswa, Nicole: Maternal care strategies in Phylloneta impressa (Theridiidae)<br />

Krasheninnikova, Anastasia: Means‐end comprehension in parrots: a comparative approach<br />

Kremers, Dorothee: Vocal repertoire of the Orcas (Orcinus orca) in the Loro Parque, Tenerife<br />

– Individual differences in their vocalizations<br />

Lembke, Anna: The influence of social interaction between male cavies and juvenile female<br />

cavies (Cavia aperea) and of male odors on the maturation of females<br />

Müller, Anna: The impact of social rank after confrontation with conspecifics on the<br />

reproductive competence of male Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus)<br />

Schindler, Britta: Home sweet home‐ the influence of housing conditions on stress<br />

physiology, cognition and emotional behaviour in mice selectively bred for extremes<br />

in stress reactivity<br />

Schneider, Tilman: Microhabitat selection by European Bison (Bison bonasus) in Białowieża<br />

Primeval Forest, Poland<br />

Schnöll, Anna Viktoria: Testing for social diffusion of two novel foraging skills and<br />

conformity in wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons)<br />

Spiller, Ilka: Who determines the end of brood care in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)?<br />

Titulaer, Mieke: Context‐dependent learning performance in relation to avian personalities<br />

Waldmann, Miriam: Relevance of acoustic parameters in the spectacled parrotlet’s (Forpus<br />

conspicillatus) contact call<br />

Wastinavo, Marta: Differences in activity budgets and social behaviours of three male<br />

alternative reproductive tactics in African stripped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio)<br />

Zimmer, Stefanie: Determinants of natural mating success in the cannibalistic orb‐web<br />

spider Argiope bruennichi<br />

6


PhD‐theses<br />

EVOLUTION OF PLASTIC LIFE‐HISTORIES<br />

Barbara Fischer<br />

barbara.fischer@bio.uio.no<br />

Research Update<br />

PhD Thesis, 2010, Supervisors: PD Dr. Barbara Taborsky, PD Dr. Ulf Dieckmann, Dept. Behavioural<br />

Ecology, University of Bern, Switzerland and Evolution & Ecology Program, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria<br />

Most environments fluctuate unpredictably at least to some degree, but surprisingly most life history<br />

models ignore stochastic environmental changes. By theoretical modelling we investigated the<br />

conditions favouring phenotypic plasticity of life histories, influences on the extent of plasticity in a<br />

trait and why and how much plasticity should change with age in stochastic environments. We<br />

analyzed how organisms should optimally allocate energy to reproduction vs. maintenance and how<br />

plastic they should be in their allocation decisions in environments differing by their degree of<br />

variability and predictability. It turned out that optimal reproductive investment should not increase<br />

monotonically with growing energy availability as one would intuitively assume. Instead, the reaction<br />

norm describing reproductive investment has a U‐shape, with high reproductive investment when<br />

energy availability is close to zero ('terminal investment') and when energy availability is high. At an<br />

intermediate level of energy availability, reproductive investment decreases to a minimum or even to<br />

zero. This indicates that in intermediate environments it can be optimal to skip reproductive events.<br />

Organisms may buffer the impact of environmental fluctuations by storing energy. So far, general life<br />

history models analysed optimal storage strategies in deterministic environments only. When<br />

incorporating stochastic changes of conditions, our model results suggest that when environments<br />

are almost constant, it is not optimal to store. Allocation to storage is favoured when environments<br />

become more variable and/or more predictable. Our results suggest that the simultaneous allocation<br />

of energy to reproduction, maintenance and storage can be optimal, which contrasts earlier findings<br />

from models in deterministic environments. Finally, we asked why plasticity should vary with age and<br />

whether there are windows of plasticity over life time. Many organisms possess 'plasticity windows',<br />

during which they are responsive towards external cues. When exposed to an environmental cue at a<br />

time outside the plasticity window, no adjustment occurs. We hypothesized that information gain<br />

through environmental sampling is a potential mechanism that can lead to the evolution of age‐<br />

dependent plasticity. Our results suggest that this mechanism may indeed give rise to a remarkable<br />

diversity of age‐dependent plasticity patterns, ranging from lifelong plasticity to narrow plasticity<br />

windows. As a specific example of the evolution of plasticity we modelled how mothers should solve<br />

the offspring size‐number trade‐off when environmental cues are unreliable. Our model results<br />

suggest that plastic offspring size strategies are superior to fixed strategies when environmental cues<br />

are at least moderately reliable. The plasticity threshold depends on plasticity costs and the diffe‐<br />

rence of resources available to mothers. Plastic strategies are increasingly favoured the more<br />

offspring survival varies between environmental states. The occurring switches between small and<br />

large offspring are predicted to be substantial, which is confirmed by those empirical studies that did<br />

find plasticity in offspring size to exist.<br />

Reference: Fischer, B., Taborsky, B. and Dieckmann, U. 2009. Unexpected patterns of plastic energy<br />

allocation in stochastic environments. American Naturalist, 173: 108‐120.<br />

7


THE INFLUENCE OF EARLY ENVIRONMENT ON LATER LIFE ‐ PHYSIOLOGY, BEHAVIOUR<br />

AND EVOLUTION<br />

Alexander Kotrschal<br />

alexander.kotrschal@ebc.uu.se<br />

Research Update<br />

PhD Thesis, 2010, supervised by PD Dr. Barbara Taborsky, Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology<br />

and Evolution, University of Bern, Switzerland<br />

Current affiliation: Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden.<br />

Phenotypic plasticity is a universal feature of organisms. Environmentally induced parental<br />

effects represent a form of phenotypic plasticity spanning generations. There is rapidly<br />

growing evidence that the environmental conditions experienced by females around<br />

reproduction can influence offspring phenotype in plants and animals. However, even<br />

environmental conditions experienced long before reproduction during the juvenile period<br />

of females can mediate crucial life‐history traits. Females of the cichlid fish Simochromis<br />

pleurospilus are known adjust offspring size in response to own juvenile nutrition. We tested<br />

whether these condition enable them to predict the postnatal conditions of their offspring<br />

better than the current conditions do, which requires certain conditions of habitat<br />

variability, distribution of juveniles and adults and gene flow between populations to hold.<br />

By combining detailed ecological and population surveys with fine‐scaled population<br />

genetics we confirmed that these requirements hold for our study species in their natural<br />

environment. Next we investigated the physiological consequences for juveniles of growing<br />

up in poor or rich environments and found a persistent alteration in metabolic rate and food<br />

conversion efficiency. In preparation of this study we developed a non‐invasive method to<br />

determine fat storage to be used in small, live fish. This technique estimates fat based on<br />

measures of swim bladder size, and predicts visceral fat content better than available<br />

morphometric condition indices. Besides physiology, we detected that the early nutritional<br />

conditions also affect learning abilities. Unexpectedly, the absolute amount of food did not<br />

affect learning. Instead we found that a single ration switch experienced by juveniles<br />

enhanced their learning abilities both as juveniles and as adults (Kotrschal & Taborsky,<br />

2010a). This appears to represent an adaptive strategy, as higher cognitive abilities may<br />

confer a survival advantage in variable environments. Overly fast growth during a specific,<br />

short time window during the development negatively influenced adult learning abilities,<br />

however. Although it was not possible to test mating preferences in dependence of early<br />

nutrition, we detected that our study species has a very peculiar mating system which<br />

posses features of both resource defence mating systems and exploded leks: The<br />

distribution of males, females and resources clearly resembles leks. Male territory defence,<br />

however, seems to enhance the quality of resources and thus generates critical resources for<br />

females, which attracts females in the vicinity of courting males (Kotrschal & Taborsky,<br />

2010b).<br />

Kotrschal, A. & Taborsky, B. 2010a. Environmental change enhances cognitive abilities in fish.<br />

PLoS Biology 8: e1000351.<br />

Kotrschal, A. & Taborsky, B. 2010b. Resource Defence or Exploded Lek ‐ A Question of<br />

Perspective. Ethology 116: 1‐10.<br />

8


HEART RATE IN GREYLAG GEESE (ANSER ANSER): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF<br />

SOCIAL SYSTEMS<br />

Claudia A. F. Wascher<br />

claudia.wascher@klf.ac.at<br />

Research Update<br />

PhD thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. K. Kotrschal, Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle, Universität Wien<br />

Social contexts are among the most potent stressors, affecting individual behaviour,<br />

physiology and the immune system. Although energetically costly, short‐term elevation of<br />

the stress response is adaptive and unavoidable in coping with challenges. In contrast<br />

chronic activation of the stress axes may have pathological consequences. Therefore, in<br />

terms of an individual’s fitness and well being, it is of major importance to respond to<br />

stressors adequately. However, not all members of a population are equally affected,<br />

individuals differ in their responses to stressors according their social embedding,<br />

personality, status, sex, age, etc.. In the course of my PhD I investigated the individual<br />

investment in the social domain as measured by heart rate (HR). I recorded HR of 25 greylag<br />

geese with fully implanted sensor‐transmitter packages for 18 months. Besides physical<br />

activity, social interactions proved to be the strongest HR modulators. In agonistic<br />

encounters HR increased to a greater extend, when the risk of being defeated was higher<br />

(e.g. in interactions with an opponent who wins a higher percentage of interactions). The<br />

present results suggest that individuals modulate their HR very flexible according to the<br />

relevance of single agonistic encounters. Even more impressive, HR was not only modulated<br />

by active involvement in stressful events, but also by watching interactions (“bystander<br />

effect”). Also here, the relevance of the event determines the immediate physiological<br />

response. Greylag geese responded stronger watching social (e.g. agonistic encounters,<br />

arriving or departing geese) than non‐social events (e.g. vehicles passing by, thunder).<br />

Furthermore, HR response differed, depending on the individuals involved in an event.<br />

Geese responded stronger when watching interactions, in which the pair‐partner or a family<br />

member was involved compared to events with non‐associated individuals. A similar picture<br />

appeared, when comparing HR responses to conspecifics vocalisations. HR was significantly<br />

higher if the pair‐partner called, compared to non‐associated geese. One of the key<br />

mechanisms to optimize the investment into the social domain is social support, which is<br />

defined as the stress‐reducing effect of the presence of a familiar social partner. Here, for<br />

the first time, effects of passive social support with respect to HR are reported in non‐human<br />

animals. In a stressful situation, unpaired individuals showed a significantly higher HR than<br />

paired individuals, which indicates that having a social ally, effects an individual’s physiology.<br />

To sum up, I found social events to have pronounced effects on an individual’s physiology.<br />

This may have serious consequences with respect to energy expenditure and probably may<br />

even affect an animal’s health or reproductive success. Still, individuals modulated their HR<br />

response according to the relevance of single events (e.g. risk of being defeated, social ally<br />

involved). Also, social support has been shown to have stress reducing effects with respect<br />

to HR. Therefore, living in social groups for greylag geese seems potentially energetically<br />

costly, but the individual investment is optimized by flexible modulation of the physiological<br />

stress response according to subsequent needs and requirements.<br />

9


Masters and Diplom theses<br />

THE ACOUSTIC RECOGNITION SYSTEM OF WILD BOARS (SUS SCROFA)<br />

lka Bürgener<br />

smanti@gmx.net<br />

Research Update<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Dr. R. Wanker and Prof. Dr. J. Schneider, Department of Biology,<br />

Zoological Institute & Museum, University of Hamburg<br />

Species, which live in complex social systems, evolve a broad vocal repertoire. Wild boars<br />

(Sus scrofa) live in matrilineal groups with a pattern of fission‐fusion and use a wide range of<br />

vocalizations. Several studies investigated the ability of individual recognition in both<br />

domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) and wild boars but it is unknown to which extend<br />

acoustic cues are involved. Aim of this study was to examine the recognition ability by<br />

acoustic cues of wild boars, and more specifically to determine whether their vocalizations<br />

possess individual signatures and whether there are group‐specific calls. Furthermore I<br />

investigated whether infrasonic elements are present in long‐distance communication of the<br />

wild boars . I recorded the vocalizations of four wild boar groups in four different wildlife<br />

parks. The contact grunts were measured, analysed and classified by individuals. Playback<br />

experiments were carried out with one group to test the ability to discriminate familiar and<br />

unfamiliar conspecifics by their grunts. I found that contact grunts contain both individual<br />

and group‐specific signatures, but the playback experiment failed to verify that they can<br />

discriminate conspecifics by their contact grunts. Furthermore it turns out that wild boars do<br />

not use infrasonic calls for long‐distance communication, but their grunts contain very low<br />

frequencies, which may reach into the infrasonic range. These grunts were uttered in<br />

conflict situations, suggesting that the wild boars may intensify their aggressive message<br />

with these low frequencies.<br />

10


SEXUAL CANNIBALISM: WHAT DO MALES HAVE TO OFFER?<br />

Sarah Deventer<br />

sari_australia@hotmail.com<br />

Research Update<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. J.M. Schneider & Prof. M.E. Herberstein, Department of<br />

Biology, Zoological Institute & Museum, University of Hamburg<br />

The occurrence of sexual cannibalism is well documented, but why this extreme behaviour<br />

evolved in the first place is only partially known, and explanations are often species specific<br />

and not mutually exclusive. Some hypotheses incorporate the nutritional aspect of<br />

consumption of males. It is conceivable that conspecific males constitute a higher quality<br />

food for females than their usual diet due to the fact that males should hold nutrients which<br />

females of the same species also need, already in the right proportions. Moreover, males<br />

could contain essential nutrients that are absent in alternative prey or at least hold higher<br />

amounts of these desirable nutrients. A number of studies showed a positive effect of sexual<br />

cannibalism on female fecundity. However, it is not clear if this increased fecundity is only<br />

due to the fact that cannibalistic females gained additional food in those studies. Thus the<br />

question arises if females still retain a fecundity advantage when cannibalising a male<br />

compared to ingestion of a comparably sized other prey.<br />

The aim of this study was to compare female feeding rate between a sexual cannibalistic and<br />

a non‐cannibalistic feeding event, and, importantly, to assess how this translates into the<br />

eggs and spiderlings. We predicted a fecundity benefit (in terms of number and/or quality of<br />

offspring) from sexual cannibalism compared to consumption of comparably sized other<br />

prey.<br />

We found that spiderlings from females that consumed a male hatched slightly earlier, and<br />

started web construction sooner than from the control group. Three further offspring<br />

parameters (size, mass and survival duration under food deprivation) were positively and<br />

exclusively correlated to spiderlings’ lipid content. Although crickets hold more lipids than<br />

males and females took advantage of that, those three mentioned lipid‐dependent offspring<br />

parameters were not affected by whether the female consumed a male or a cricket.<br />

These results can be interpreted against, or in favour of the hypothesis that conspecific<br />

males constitute a high quality food for females. Nevertheless, these results show that males<br />

contain a different nutritional aspect than crickets (besides their lack of lipids) that<br />

influenced offspring. These differential effects are quite subtle, and not detectable in the<br />

commonly quantified measures of fecundity (egg sac weight or number of offspring). To our<br />

knowledge, this is the first study directly comparing the consequences of sexual cannibalism<br />

and a heterospecific feeding event on offspring, looking at offspring quality and behaviour.<br />

The results of this study extend the foraging hypothesis in relation to sexual cannibalism by<br />

adding the aspect of male nutritional content, and highlight the need for more research on<br />

the nutritional value of cannibalism, not (only) as an additional food source, but more<br />

specifically in comparison to the usual prey of females.<br />

11


Research Update<br />

THE INFLUENCE OF FEMALE BODY CONDITION AND PREDATOR THREAT ON THE BROOD CARE<br />

BEHAVIOUR OF MOUTHBROODING CICHLIDS<br />

Barbara Gerber<br />

gerberb1@hotmail.com<br />

Master Thesis, 2010, supervised by PD Dr. Barbara Taborsky, Behavioural Ecology, Institute of<br />

Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Switzerland<br />

When parental environmental conditions affect brood care decisions they can have a trans‐<br />

generational impact on offspring phenotype and survival. Parental energetic needs and<br />

offspring predation pressure have both been recognized as important factors influencing the<br />

quality of parental care, but surprisingly they are rarely manipulated simultaneously to<br />

investigate how parents adjust care to these potentially conflicting demands. In the<br />

maternally mouthbrooding cichlid Simochromis pleurosplius, we manipulated female body<br />

condition before spawning by different rations and perceived offspring predation risk by<br />

visual presentation of a natural predator during brood care in a two‐by‐two factorial<br />

experiment. We found that females on a low body condition produced smaller, but more<br />

young and engaged less in brood care behaviour than females with a high body conditons.<br />

Final clutch size and, related to this, female protective behaviour, was interactively<br />

determined by maternal nutrition and predator exposure. Surprisingly, high food females<br />

without a predator experience had smaller clutches than all other females. Our results<br />

highlight the importance to investigate the critical selective forces on parents and offspring<br />

in combination, if we aim to understand reproductive strategies.<br />

12


MATERNAL CARE STRATEGIES IN PHYLLONETA IMPRESSA (THERIDIIDAE)<br />

Nicole Gonswa<br />

nicolegonswa@alice‐dsl.net<br />

Research Update<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. J.M. Schneider, Department of Biology, Zoological Institute &<br />

Museum, University of Hamburg<br />

Semelparous life‐history strategies evolve if chances of future reproduction are low due to<br />

extrinsic and intrinsic causes and often involve extreme forms of brood care. Brood care<br />

generally benefits the offspring by increasing survival and growth, and with maximal<br />

investment in a single brood or clutch females maximizes the number and/or the quality of<br />

their current young at the expense of future offspring. Semelparity in spiders evolved in<br />

several families and in some cases involves matriphagy: the consumption of the mother by<br />

the young. Obligate matriphagy as found in the eresid spider Stegodyphus lineatus implies<br />

that females forgo all possibilities of future reproduction even if their single brood turns out<br />

to provide suboptimal returns. However, conditions are rarely predictable and females<br />

should benefit if they retain the ability to opt for a second clutch if the first one survives and<br />

grows well without her terminal investment.<br />

I investigated whether the maternal care behaviour of Phylloneta impressa, a<br />

subsocial spider with excessive maternal care, shows plasticity. Females provide their young<br />

with regurgitated fluid and prey and finally, matriphagy terminates brood care. I collected<br />

females with cocoons and raised the offspring of these spiders to maturity in the laboratory.<br />

After maturation, females were mated and assigned to three different food treatments<br />

(high, low, no food availability) and maternal care behaviour and growth of young was<br />

documented.<br />

I found that these spiders practice facultative semelparity and flexibly adapt their<br />

brood care to the food availability and offspring needs. In the high food treatment, maternal<br />

care duration was shorter but the offspring developed slower than in other treatments.<br />

None of the females in the high food treatment was eaten by their young and 33 % of<br />

females survived the maternal care period and were able to successfully produce a second<br />

clutch. Matriphagy occurred only in broods with limited or no food. Additionally the<br />

occurrence of matriphagy depended on the number of spiderlings in the brood and was not<br />

observed in small broods. Matriphagy is the only form of cannibalism that was observed<br />

during my experiments; no siblicid was seen.<br />

My results show that a high plasticity is not excluded by the occurrence of<br />

matriphagy as an extreme form of brood care. My results further support the notion that<br />

matriphagy must not involve major physiological changes that preclude future reproduction.<br />

P. impressa opportunistally adjust their maternal investment in the current brood to<br />

offspring needs which are a function of the brood size and the availability of prey.<br />

13


MEANS‐END COMPREHENSION IN PARROTS: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH<br />

Anastasia Krasheninnikova<br />

anastacia.k@web.de<br />

Research Update<br />

Master thesis, supervised by Dr. Ralf Wanker and Prof. Dr. Jutta Schneider, Department of Biology,<br />

University of Hamburg, Martin‐Luther‐king‐Platz 3, 20146, Hamburg, Germany<br />

Two opposing theories explain the evolutionary history of intelligence. The “adaptive<br />

specialization approach” suggests that differences in the ecological and social problems<br />

faced by a species lead to domain‐specific cognitive abilities. Alternatively, the “general<br />

process view” proposes a broader set of cognitive abilities as a consequence of the evolution<br />

of large brains.<br />

The aim of this study was a comparative approach to test the cognitive abilities of<br />

several distantly related parrot species with a means‐end problem, the string discrimination<br />

paradigm. I have presented subjects with string‐pulling tasks where I have varied the spatial<br />

relationship between the strings, the presence of a reward and the physical contact between<br />

the string and the reward to determine whether the parrots perform differently in cognitive<br />

tasks requiring means‐end comprehension.<br />

The results suggest that the ability to pull the string is a domain‐general capability in<br />

psittacids, but the degree of means‐end comprehension vary according to the different<br />

degree of the social complexity of the tested species. The more complex the social system,<br />

the more advanced the cognitive capabilities. This is the first evidence of the evolutionary<br />

history of certain cognitive skills in parrots and the role that the social complexity may play<br />

in this process.<br />

14


Research Update<br />

VOCAL REPERTOIRE OF THE ORCAS (ORCINUS ORCA) IN THE LORO PARQUE, TENERIFE –<br />

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THEIR VOCALIZATIONS<br />

Dorothee Kremers<br />

dorothee.kremers@googlemail.com<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Dr. Ralf Wanker, Biozentrum Grindel, University of Hamburg, Martin‐<br />

Luther‐King‐Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany<br />

In several mammalian species a complex vocal repertoire seems to be correlated with a<br />

complex social system. Orcas live in such a highly social system and use complex<br />

vocalizations. This study tested if orcas possess individual differences in their vocalizations<br />

that might indicate vocal individual recognition. The vocalizations of four orcas were for the<br />

first time recorded with reliable information about the sender’s identity. Within call types<br />

there were individual differences. Even the composition of the repertoire differed between<br />

individuals. The first evidence for individual specific vocalizations in orcas was found<br />

because three individuals produced individual specific calls. Furthermore, the yet untested<br />

assumption that call diversity in captive orcas could be decreased was tested. For that<br />

reason the vocalizations were compared with the vocalizations of free‐living orcas. The<br />

repertoire of the captive orcas included all types of vocalizations known from field studies.<br />

Some of the call types showed similarities with call types described for free‐living orcas. The<br />

results suggest that these individual specific calls might be used for individual recognition in<br />

this species and that the assumption of repertoire degeneration in captive orcas has to be<br />

reconsidered<br />

15


Research Update<br />

THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL INTERACTION BETWEEN MALE CAVIES AND JUVENILE FEMALE CAVIES<br />

(CAVIA APEREA) AND OF MALE ODORS ON THE MATURATION OF FEMALES<br />

Antje Lembke<br />

antje.lembke@gmx.de<br />

Masters Thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. Fritz Trillmich, Department of Animal Behavior, and Prof. Dr.<br />

C. Müller, Dept. Chemical Ecology, University of Bielefeld<br />

This study targeted the topic of male influence on the timing of female maturation. The<br />

timing of female maturation is a crucial factor in the life history, especially of small, short<br />

lived mammals. In mice the male influence is well known as the ‘Vandenberg effect’, elicited<br />

by male urinary proteins. In the precocial caviomorph, Cavia aperea the male effect is not<br />

elicited by metabolites in urine. The mechanism behind this effect is still unknown. I tested<br />

the hypothesis that male behavior and male odor contribute to the acceleration of puberty<br />

in females.<br />

In the behavioral experiment, the female onset of fertility was examined. A pair of<br />

females was housed either next to castrates or next to a male, separated by wire mesh. One<br />

of the two females was put into contact with the male or castrate every four days for one<br />

hour. During this time the behavior was recorded. Females housed next to males matured<br />

significantly earlier than females housed next to castrates. The physical contact did not make<br />

a difference in the onset of estrus in the females. Males and castrates did not differ in any of<br />

the behaviors towards females recorded and no significant correlation was found in the<br />

overall activity of males and castrates with the onset of estrus in the females.<br />

To investigate olfactory stimuli, samples of perineal secretion were collected and<br />

analyzed by gas‐chromatography and mass‐spectrometry (GCMS). The spectra of males and<br />

castrates differed significantly. Various peaks were found in male perineal gland secretion<br />

only, but no metabolites were found exclusively in castrates. The number of peaks found in<br />

the male or castrate secretion was correlated with the onset of fertility of the corresponding<br />

female in contact. The results of my experiments suggest that the difference in perineal<br />

gland scent between fertile males and castrates could account for the difference in the<br />

timing of puberty in female cavies. Further characterization of the active substances is<br />

needed.<br />

16


Research Update<br />

THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL RANK AFTER CONFRONTATION WITH CONSPECIFICS ON THE<br />

REPRODUCTIVE COMPETENCE OF MALE DJUNGARIAN HAMSTERS (PHODOPUS SUNGORUS,<br />

PALLAS 1773)<br />

Anna Müller<br />

anna_mueller@gmx.net<br />

Diploma Thesis, Supervisors: Dr. Peter Fritzsche, PD Dr. Dietmar Weinert, Institute of<br />

Biology/Zoology, University of Halle<br />

Dominance is a central feature of agonistic behaviour across a wide range of taxonomic<br />

groups and important in order to occupy new limited territories, resources or to increase the<br />

access to mates within a social group with a hierarchical background. In laboratory analyses,<br />

hamsters seem to be excellent model organisms for studying fundamentally functional and<br />

mechanistic characteristics of aggression processes. Several researchers described high‐<br />

aggressive fights between male Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) sometimes<br />

resulting in death of one individual of the encounter pairs. But relatively little is known<br />

about the social behaviour of these animals. Therefore males of Phodopus sungorus were<br />

used in this study to analyse dominance/subordination‐relationships and their possible<br />

impact on fertility and reproductive success. Males were confronted as dyadic encounters in<br />

a neutral arena and in their housing cages to define agonistic and submissive behavioural<br />

patterns as well as to characterize them by means of morphological and physiological<br />

parameters. Furthermore, it was investigated whether females choose males depending on<br />

their social status.<br />

Specific dyadic encounter‐experiments showed that the males were able to form<br />

stable dominance/subordination‐relationships under laboratory conditions and could be<br />

classified into dominant and subordinate individuals by characteristic agonistic and<br />

submissive behavioural patterns. A comparison of dominant, subordinate and singly caged<br />

individuals revealed significant larger and heavier testis and a higher number and density of<br />

sperms in dominant males. Whereas no differences in plasma testosterone could be found,<br />

subordinate males had higher corticosterone levels in their faeces. Finally, females of<br />

P. sungorus in the oestrus phase preferred dominant males compared to the other phases of<br />

the sexual cycle.<br />

17


Research Update<br />

HOME SWEET HOME – THE INFLUENCE OF HOUSING CONDITIONS ON STRESS PHYSIOLOGY,<br />

COGNITION AND EMOTIONAL BEHAVIOUR IN MICE SELECTIVELY BRED<br />

FOR EXTREMES IN STRESS REACTIVITY<br />

Britta Schindler<br />

britta.schindler@gmx.net<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Dr. Chadi Touma, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Research Group<br />

of Psychoneuroendocrinology, Kraepelinstr. 2‐10, D‐80804 Munich<br />

It has repeatedly been shown that environmental factors can substantially affect the<br />

phenotype of an individual, including social behaviour, changes of body and organ weight as<br />

well as neuroendocrine parameters. Furthermore, it has been reported that specific brain<br />

regions such as the hippocampus, which is important for learning and memory, are also<br />

influenced by the environment. An ideal system to study these gene‐environment<br />

interactions is to make use of animal models that show a strong genetic predisposition for<br />

certain endophenotypes. Such a model was recently established in our group. This ‘stress<br />

reactivity’ (SR) mouse model consists of three independent mouse lines selectively bred for a<br />

high (HR), intermediate (IR) or low (LR) secretion of corticosterone from the adrenals in<br />

response to a standardised, psychological stressor (15‐min restraint), i.e. showing a hyper‐ or<br />

a hypo‐reactivity of the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenocortical (HPA) axis.<br />

The goal of the present study was therefore to investigate the impact of non‐social<br />

environmental factors such as different housing conditions on specific phenotypes of the SR<br />

mouse model. Of each breeding line, 32 juvenile males were divided into two groups and<br />

kept in groups of four, either under enriched (EN) or standard (ST) housing conditions. In<br />

addition to the bedding and nesting material provided in the ST cages, the EN cages were<br />

equipped with a shelter, a wooden climbing frame as well as with extra bedding and nesting<br />

material. In order to analyse potential differences in the agonistic, socio‐positive and play<br />

behaviour as well as in general activities, we recorded the home cage behaviour of the<br />

animals at three time points (once per week during the first hour of the light phase).<br />

Furthermore, we monitored the body weight of the animals, food intake and coat status to<br />

document the welfare of the animals as well as changes in energy metabolism. After<br />

exposing the animals for six weeks to the respective housing conditions, they were subjected<br />

to a battery of behavioural tests assessing their emotionality, including explorative drive<br />

(open field test, OF), anxiety‐related behaviour (elevated plus‐maze test, EPM) and stress<br />

coping behaviour (forced swim test, FST). Moreover, spatial learning abilities were assessed<br />

in the Y‐maze test and potential effects on HPA axis reactivity were analysed by subjecting<br />

the animals to a ‘stress reactivity’ test (SRT).<br />

The results of our experiment revealed that housing under enriched conditions<br />

influenced several behavioural and neuroendocrine parameters in the SR mouse model.<br />

Compared to ST housed animals, EN housed mice of all three lines showed a higher variety<br />

of behaviours performed in the home cage and significantly less agonistic interactions were<br />

observed. This coincided with decreased corticosterone levels in HR‐EN mice immediately<br />

before the SRT, although the corticosterone response to the stressor was not influenced and<br />

the characteristic HPA axis reactivity differences between HR, IR and LR mice persisted in<br />

both housing conditions. Similarly, stress coping behaviour in the FST was modified towards<br />

more active coping under EN housing conditions (more ‘struggling’ in IR mice and less<br />

18


Research Update<br />

‘floating’ in HR and LR animals), but without abolishing the significant differences between<br />

the three mouse lines. No effects were observed on locomotor activity and anxiety‐related<br />

behaviours in the OF and EPM test. Regarding spatial memory, IR and LR mice housed under<br />

ST or EN conditions showed a significantly higher time spent in the novel arm compared to<br />

the familiar arms during the retrieval phase of the Y‐maze test. HR mice, however, only<br />

discriminated between the two types of arms when they have been housed in EN cages.<br />

Thus, our study shed light on the complex interaction between environmental factors<br />

and genetic predispositions to develop endophenotypes relevant for the aetiology of<br />

affective disorders such as major depression.<br />

19


Research Update<br />

MICROHABITAT SELECTION BY EUROPEAN BISON (BISON BONASUS) IN BIAŁOWIEŻA PRIMEVAL<br />

FOREST, POLAND<br />

Tilman C. Schneider<br />

tilman.carlo@googlemail.com<br />

Master Thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. Peter Kappeler, Anthropologie/Soziobiologie, Georg‐August<br />

Universität Göttingen, Dr. Rafał Kowalczyk, Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences<br />

Resting site selection by European bison (Bison bonasus, L., 1758), the largest terrestrial<br />

mammal of Europe, was studied in the free‐ranging population in Białowieża Primeval Forest<br />

(Poland) in 2009‐2010. In total, 104 sites of 21 bison (both collared and uncollared) were<br />

analysed to determine the most important microhabitat characteristics selected by resting<br />

bison during summer and winter. I examined whether bison selected characteristic resting<br />

sites providing shelter from disturbances and precipitation, and how supplementary winter<br />

feeding influenced the microhabitat selection by bison. Resting sites were identified on the<br />

basis of GPS locations and activity records, as well as direct observations, and were<br />

compared with control sites. In 95% of locations prescribed on the basis of GPS collar data, a<br />

bison bed was found. Habitat types, forest stand characteristics and distances of the sites to<br />

roads and open areas and the harassment by pest insects were recorded. Microhabitat<br />

selection by bison did not differ significantly between the sexes. During summer and winter,<br />

bison resting sites displayed a high tree density, low visibility and high complexity (structures<br />

providing cover). Summer resting sites were also characterised by a lower abundance of<br />

blood‐sucking insects and denser canopy than control sites. Winter resting sites showed a<br />

lower complexity and higher visibility than summer sites, and were less often located in<br />

mixed forest habitats. During winter, bison rested more frequently in forest below 50 years<br />

of age than in older forest. Resting sites of non‐supplied bison were more often located in<br />

young coniferous forests, were lower in visibility and situated closer to open areas than sites<br />

of bison using supplementary winter feeding, suggesting a trade‐off between food and<br />

cover. Statistical models revealed tree density, visibility and the distance to roads as crucial<br />

variables distinguishing resting sites of supplied and non‐supplied bison. The results indicate<br />

that European bison select their resting sites in areas of mosaic habitat structure providing<br />

cover from disturbances with access to profitable natural forage grounds.<br />

20


TESTING FOR SOCIAL DIFFUSION OF TWO NOVEL FORAGING SKILLS AND CONFORMITY IN<br />

WILD REDFRONTED LEMURS (EULEMUR RUFIFRONS)<br />

Anna Viktoria Schnöll<br />

a0402262@unet.univie.ac.at<br />

Research Update<br />

Diplom Thesis, supervised by Dr. Claudia Fichtel, Prof. Dr. Peter Kappeler, Abt. Verhaltensökologie &<br />

Soziobiologie, Deutsches Primatenzentrum , Göttingen, Prof. Dr. Ludwig HIber, Abt. Kognitive<br />

Biologie, Universität Wien<br />

Recent research revealed that traditions are not a unique feature of human culture, but that<br />

they can be found in animal societies as well. However, the underlying mechanisms and<br />

conditions leading to social diffusion of newly invented behaviours, as well as the<br />

importance of the formation of traditions for animals living in the wild, are still poorly<br />

understood. To address these questions, I conducted a social diffusion experiment with<br />

three wild groups of redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons). I used a ‘two‐option’ feeding<br />

box, where animals could either open or push a door to get access to a fruit reward to study<br />

whether and how the trait spreads through the groups. Half of the 28 study animals were<br />

able to learn the new feeding skills and mainly kept a seeded technique (groups with<br />

training) or adjusted (group without training) their behaviour to the majority of the group.<br />

Individuals observing others more often needed fewer trials until they could successfully<br />

open the door, indicating that social learning played an important role in acquiring the task.<br />

An option bias analysis suggested that social learning was involved in the spread of the novel<br />

behaviours, whereas a network‐based diffusion analysis indicated pure asocial learning.<br />

Moreover, redfronted lemurs invented a third technique for accessing the reward:<br />

scrounging. Interestingly they did not scrounge more often from kin. Thus, redfronted<br />

lemurs are able to form behavioural traditions. In addition, these results suggest that the<br />

study animals did not simply keep the first rewarded technique but showed a high flexibility<br />

in choosing between social and individual learning.<br />

21


Research Update<br />

WHO DETERMINES THE END OF BROOD CARE IN THE ZEBRA FINCH (TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA)?<br />

Inka Spiller<br />

inka.spiller@uni‐oldenburg.de<br />

Bachelor Thesis, Supervisor: Fritz Trillmich & Tobias Krause; Dept of Animal Behaviour, University of<br />

Bielefeld<br />

A long‐standing question concerns the ending of brood care in mammals and birds: This is<br />

supposed to lead to parent‐offspring conflict, with parents selected to end care earlier than<br />

offspring would like. Who decides in this: parent(s) or offspring? I studied this question in an<br />

altricial birds, the Australian zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) by cross–fostering young of<br />

different ages. In one treatment the parents received 3 ‐ 15 days younger chicks and in the<br />

other chicks that were 3 ‐ 7 days older than their own. In addition, there were two control<br />

groups: In the first, parents were permitted to rear their own chicks and in the second they<br />

received cross‐fostered chicks of the same age (+/‐ 2 days).<br />

Parents extended brood care when they received younger chicks and shortened it<br />

when getting older ones. Young always fledged when about 18‐20 days old, independent of<br />

treatment and at the same time as the two control groups. To determine whether parents<br />

stop feeding when chicks present stimuli normally shown by 19 day old young, I kept young<br />

of 5 broods artificially for up to 6 days longer in the nest. These young were equally fed by<br />

the parents. The results demonstrate unequivocally that young determine the age of<br />

fledging.<br />

After fledging, parents fed chicks of all treatment groups for approximately the same<br />

duration whether they had received older, younger, or equal‐aged chicks. Also the ones that<br />

had been fed in the nest for longer than normal were fed outside the nest for about the<br />

same period. My results demonstrate that in this altricial bird young determine the age at<br />

fledging and increased time of brood care in the nest does not shorten parental care after<br />

fledging. Thus there is little evidence for parent‐offspring conflict.<br />

22


CONTEXT‐DEPENDENT LEARNING PERFORMANCE IN RELATION TO AVIAN PERSONALITIES<br />

Mieke Titulaer<br />

m.titulaer@nioo.knaw.nl<br />

Research Update<br />

Master thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. Marc Naguib and Dr. Kees van Oers, Department of Animal<br />

Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW), Heteren, the Netherlands<br />

Adaptation to environmental changes is facilitated by good learning abilities. Individuals<br />

differ in their learning abilities, but little is known on how such variation is linked to<br />

consistent behavioural differences among individuals (personality traits). Great tits (Parus<br />

major) differ consistently in their exploratory behaviour in a novel environment, and this<br />

correlates with a range of behavioural traits. It thus can be used as proxy for personality.<br />

Here we subjected birds to a dimensional shift learning paradigm to study the link between<br />

learning and personality. The learning paradigm included several stages differing in<br />

complexity. First, the birds were trained to find food under one of two colours or at one of<br />

two locations, after which the previously unrewarded colour or location became rewarded<br />

(reversal). Then, two new colours and locations were given (intra‐dimensional shift) and<br />

finally, the rewarded dimension was changed from colour to location or vice versa (extra‐<br />

dimensional shift). Previous studies have shown that fast exploring individuals are less<br />

flexible than slow explorers. Therefore we expected slow explorers to perform better in the<br />

reversal and extra‐dimensional shift, which are established measures of flexibility. The<br />

results show that reversal learning was the most difficult stage and apparently it was the<br />

only stage in which personality differences in performance were found, but in opposite<br />

direction for males and females. Fast exploring males showed more flexible learning abilities<br />

than slow males, whereas in females slow explorers outperforming fast explorers. The sex‐<br />

specific relationship between exploratory behaviour and performance on the reversal task<br />

shows that personality may have important consequences for the capacity of an animal to<br />

adapt to the environment, depending on sex and context, with possible fitness implications<br />

in the wild. These context‐dependent and sex‐specific personality effects are in line with<br />

field studies and show the importance of experimental work for uncovering mechanisms of<br />

evolutionary processes in the wild.<br />

23


RELEVANCE OF ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS IN THE SPECTACLED PARROTLETS´<br />

(FORPUS CONSPICILLATUS) CONTACT CALL<br />

Miriam Waldmann<br />

miriamwaldmann@hotmail.com<br />

Research Update<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Dr. R. Wanker and Prof. Dr. J. Schneider, Department of Biology,<br />

Zoological Institute & Museum, University of Hamburg<br />

A fundamental attribute of the human language is its complex structure, which enables us to<br />

communicate in sentences. It is still not known how the ability for syntax evolved. One<br />

hypothesis is that complex social structures facilitated this ability (Social Brain Hypothesis).<br />

The Machiavellian Intelligence or Social Brain Hypothesis assumes that brain evolution was<br />

determined by complex social systems. Investigating cases of convergent evolution of<br />

communication is a particularly promising approach in this context. Spectacled parrotlets<br />

evolved a sophisticated communication and with their contact calls they transmit<br />

information about who is calling, which bird is called and which group the caller belongs to.<br />

In this study, I examined whether the information embedded within the contact call of the<br />

spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus) is structured. Firstly, I compared results of<br />

previous theses about contact calls. I found that different combinations of the call<br />

parameters contain different information. The relevant call parameters are minimum and<br />

maximum frequency, bandwidth, start and end frequency, peak frequency (maximum<br />

accentuated frequency), call duration and modulation (this means changes of direction in<br />

the fundamental frequency from rising to falling and vice versa). Secondly, I used playback<br />

experiments and compared responses to natural and artificially modified calls to verify the<br />

units responsible for coding receiver identity. The modified calls elicited responses and these<br />

responses differed from controls in the number of replies. The manipulation was successful<br />

in that calls were recognised but the information about the receiver was no longer present.<br />

More such studies are required to elucidate how further information is coded within the<br />

structure of the contact call.<br />

24


Research Update<br />

DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVITY BUDGETS AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOURS OF THREE MALE ALTERNATIVE<br />

REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS IN THE AFRICAN STRIPED MOUSE (RHABDOMYS PUMILIO)<br />

Marta Wastavino<br />

marta.wastavino@gmail.com<br />

Master Thesis, supervised by PD Dr. Carsten Schradin, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and<br />

Environmental Studies, University of Zürich<br />

Alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) evolved in various animal taxa, from crustaceans to<br />

mammals. Conditional ARTs evolved when a single male is able to monopolize access to<br />

several breeding females. In such a case, other less successful males would develop an<br />

alternative reproductive tactic, which will allow them to get at least some reproductive<br />

success (“best of a bad job”). Some recent studies suggested that ARTs might differ in<br />

activity and energy budgets, such that they differ in energetic costs, which could influence<br />

reproductive success. I investigated differences in activity budgets and social behaviours of<br />

three ARTs in the group living African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) of the South<br />

African Succulent Karoo: 1. territorial dominant males defending a harem of 2‐4 females<br />

and their offspring (extended family groups), 2. roaming solitary individuals and 3. adult<br />

natally philopatric males living in extended family groups. I collected behavioural data<br />

through focal‐animal observations in the field, observing 10 territorial breeders, 7 roamers<br />

and 10 philopatric males. Additionally, I performed 18 experiments in an artificial arena to<br />

study differences in aggression between roamers and breeders. I found that I) philopatric<br />

individuals allocate their energies in survival rather than reproduction. Males following this<br />

tactic showed high level of sociopositive behaviours and trended to travel less but forage<br />

more than males of the two other tactics. II) The behaviour of roaming males is a trade‐off<br />

between survival and mating i.e., roamers intrude other male territories to seek copulations<br />

with their females, but they actively avoid risky encounters with territory owners. III)<br />

Territorial males use most of their resources for reproduction, showing high levels of<br />

aggressiveness towards roamers but amicable behaviours towards individuals of their social<br />

group. In conclusion, the study revealed significant behavioural differences between male<br />

ARTs in striped mice, especially regarding their activity budgets and correlated energy<br />

budgets, indicating differential investment strategies into survival and reproduction.<br />

25


DETERMINANTS OF NATURAL MATING SUCCESS IN THE CANNIBALISTIC ORB‐WEB SPIDER<br />

ARGIOPE BRUENNICHI<br />

Stefanie Zimmer<br />

zimmer.steffi@googlemail.com<br />

Research Update<br />

Diploma thesis, supervised by Prof. Dr. J.M. Schneider, Department of Biology, Zoological Institute &<br />

Museum, University of Hamburg<br />

Classical sex roles define the most common scenario of promiscuous males and choosy<br />

females which result in polygynous mating systems. Low male mating rates are generally<br />

associated with bi‐parental brood care but occur without paternal investment in various taxa<br />

and have evolved several times independently in spiders. Low male mating frequencies are<br />

associated with remarkable male mating strategies and are predicted to evolve under a<br />

male‐biased effective sex ratio which means that more males than females get to mate.<br />

While male reproductive strategies are well documented and male mating rates are easy to<br />

quantify, especially in sexually cannibalistic species, female reproductive strategies, the<br />

optimal female mating rate, and the factors that affect the evolution of female mating rates<br />

are still unclear.<br />

In this study, I examined natural female mating rates and tested the assumption of a male‐<br />

biased sex ratio and female polyandry in a population of Argiope bruennichi in the field. An<br />

experimental setup was designed that allowed to control female mating status prior to<br />

observations and to monitor mating rates, as well as environmental factors. I predicted<br />

variation in female mating frequencies as a result of (i) spatial and temporal heterogeneity<br />

and (ii) female traits, such as female maturation date, adult weight, and competition with<br />

other females. The possible influence of weather conditions was also assessed. Females had<br />

a low average mating rate of 1.3 and the majority copulated only once. The low degree of<br />

variation was not explained by any of the proposed factors. Male activity and the probability<br />

of copulation were influenced by factors that affected pheromone dispersion such as virgin<br />

female density and wind speed. I conclude that either the assumptions of the theory have to<br />

be reconsidered or alternatively, A. bruennichi males appear to maintain monogynous and<br />

bigynous mating strategies in the absence of obvious advantages over polygamy.<br />

26


Activities and Meetings<br />

Future meetings of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

Zürich, 17 ‐ 19 February 2011<br />

Dear colleagues,<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

it is a great pleasure to invite you to the next topical meeting of the Ethological Society,<br />

which will take place in Zürich, 17.‐19.2.2011. The topic will be on cooperation and conflict.<br />

However, we have reserved two sessions for free contributions, and of course we will accept<br />

posters of an any subject as well. Therefore, we hope to provide an attractive setting for<br />

behavioural biologists in general. Also, as you will see from the list of invited speakers, the<br />

approaches taken by these guests is very variable, ranging from physiology to evolutiony<br />

biology.<br />

Confirmed plenray speakers are: Sarah Brosnan (Geogia State University), Mike Cant<br />

(University of Exeter), Franjo Weissing (University of Groningen), Carsten Schradin<br />

(University of Zürich), and Nina Wedell (University of Exeter).<br />

The website with more detailed information concerning, travel, accommodation, program,<br />

etc. will soon be up. Claudia Fichtel will announce this information in a separate email.<br />

Deadline for abstract submission will be the 31 st of December. Mid January, contributors will<br />

be informed whether their presentation will be oral or a poster.<br />

We are looking forward to welcoming you in Zürich<br />

Barbara König and Redouan Bshary<br />

Future meetings of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

For the forthcoming years, we encourage proposals for such topical conferences, which have<br />

been quite successful since we started these meeting in 2006. Organizers are free to choose<br />

a main topic for the conference as well as the size and duration of the meeting. We prefer<br />

meetings to be scheduled in February, to avoid overlap with other commitments during the<br />

main “conference and holiday seasons”. From our own experience, having the meetings at<br />

your own place is fun and inspiring. The workloads of organizing the meeting also is not too<br />

high, given that after all the meetings will remain comparatively small and thus are ideal for<br />

discussions and vigorous exchange of ideas.<br />

27


Reports from previous conferences<br />

THE HOTTEST CONFERENCE OF THE YEAR!<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

What do you normally do with the program booklet you receive at a conference? Probably,<br />

you mark the talks you plan to attend. You might write down comments or ideas you get<br />

during an interesting lecture. Maybe you even paint little stars or boxes while waiting for a<br />

less exciting presentation to end.<br />

Now, please imagine a lecture hall, where almost all the audience is fanning<br />

themselves air with the program booklet. Different techniques are applied: Some fold the<br />

booklet in the middle, to have a more robust hand fan. Some hold it on the long edge; some<br />

on the small. Some with the right hand; some with the left. Some fan quickly; some slowly.<br />

But all fan. Welcome to the V European Conference on Behavioural Biology!<br />

Like every two years, behavioural biologists from all over Europe met to discuss<br />

results, exchange ideas and chat with old colleagues. This year the ECBB took place in<br />

Ferrara, Italy. Choosing an Italian city in the mid of July resulted in the supposedly hottest<br />

conference of the year. Despite the extreme temperatures, Leonida Fusani, associate<br />

professor at the University of Ferrara, and his team, managed to organise a sympathetic and<br />

successful conference.<br />

Elisabetta Visalberghi started the series of talks, by presenting the fascinating tool<br />

using abilities of capuchins: Those little monkeys not only use stone tools to crack open nuts.<br />

They also carefully select and transport the most appropriate tool for a specific task; an<br />

ability so far mostly associated with great apes and humans. The human abilities of tool use<br />

could be observed on the next day: Redouan Bshary, presenting the well‐deserved<br />

Tinbergen award to Katharina Hirschenhauser with warm and appreciatory words, applied<br />

all his manual skills to unwrap the bouquet of flowers. After finally receiving award and<br />

flowers, Katharina gave us an appealing overview of her work on hormones and behaviour.<br />

We learnt that the self‐perception of a fighter might be more important in the activation of<br />

testosterone associated genes than the actual outcome of the fight. In her plenary talk, Joan<br />

Strassmann gave an interesting introduction on the concept of organismality, applying this<br />

to her groups present work on Dictyostelium discoideum. Her vivid and inspiring<br />

presentation could even bring a true mammalogist to forget that it is "only" microbes, she is<br />

talking about.<br />

While Joan succeeded in presenting a whole world in a petri dish, Martin Wikelski<br />

needed the entire globe. He gave us a broad overview of what he and his co‐workers were<br />

and are achieving with the help of aircrafts, online databases (e.g.<br />

http://www.movebank.org/) and possibly NASA. And also, what he might be doing, if there<br />

was the money for it. To get a better grip on this money, he suggested, we European<br />

behavioural biologists should unite forces. Also Joan Strassmann had an idea of how<br />

corporative behaviour could improve our working success: She proposed, everybody should<br />

28


Activities and Meetings<br />

load interesting videos of their work onto youtube, to enhance teaching quality in the<br />

different institutes working on ethology. Joan already is offering an amazing collection of<br />

them (http://www.youtube.com/user/strassm). In general, everybody agreed that working<br />

together more closely would be fruitful in different aspects.<br />

Apart from the plenary talks, there have been around 150 presentations and 100<br />

posters from researchers of every level of his or her career and every possible field of<br />

ethology. We learnt, e.g., that male topi antelopes deceive the females to keep them close<br />

for mating; how Galapagos sea lions cope with their rivals; that mangrove snails can foresee<br />

the future; and that the perceived attractiveness of human male body hair depends on the<br />

fertility of a woman. With so many interesting topics in four parallel sessions, everybody had<br />

to make their own trade‐off: Do I got to the room with the most interesting talk or to the<br />

room with best air‐conditioning. So, Peter McGregor, chairing the session on "Audience<br />

effect" in D6 appreciated the choice of his audience with the words: "Thanks for coming to<br />

the physically most challenging room!"<br />

Sure enough, from time to time it was just too hot in the lecture halls for fruitful<br />

scientific discussions. But the cloister, where we enjoyed our lunch and coffee breaks, made<br />

up for that: Standing in the shadow of the cool arcades or sitting barefoot on the grass,<br />

discussions were productive and lively. This nice atmosphere of familial discussions was<br />

continued at the buffet dinner in the impressive Sala San Francesco. At the moment of good‐<br />

buy, it seemed clear that everybody is looking forward to the VI European Conference on<br />

Behavioural Biology.<br />

Just maybe not in Italy in July.<br />

Sophie von Merten<br />

Ökologische Neurobiologie, Max Planck Institut fürOrnithologie, Seewiesen<br />

29


Other Meetings<br />

12 th Conference of the <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> für Primatologie<br />

Utrecht, Netherlands, 30. March – 02. April 2011<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

We are proud to invite you for the 12th conference of the <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> für Primatologie.<br />

The meeting will be held from March 30 to April 1, 2011 in the city of Utrecht, the<br />

Netherlands that is famous for the tower of its ‘Dom’ church and has a beautiful and<br />

authentic city centre including touristic attractions.<br />

The congress will start with an opening lecture on Wednesday evening followed by drinks<br />

and snacks in the historic academic building in the city centre within walking distance of<br />

many hotels. On Thursday and Friday, a number of invited speakers will give their inspiring<br />

talks on the campus of Utrecht University.<br />

Besides the interesting scientific program we offer an interesting social program. In<br />

the afternoon of Wednesday March 30 there is a unique possibility to visit the modern<br />

primate facilities of the Biomedical Primate Research Centre (BPRC) in Rijswijk, which is the<br />

largest primate research centre in Europe. On Friday evening the meeting will be closed with<br />

a farewell party in the city centre of Utrecht. The deadline of early bird registration and<br />

submission of contributions is December 10, 2010.<br />

We hope we meet you in Utrecht!<br />

The organizing committee Dr. E.H.M. Sterck, Utrecht University and BPRC, Rijswijk Ms. A.L.<br />

Louwerse, BPRC, Rijswijk Drs. E.J. den Heijer, Utrecht University<br />

Further details: https://sites.google.com/site/gfp2011/home<br />

30


Activities and Meetings<br />

Joint Meeting of the Animal Behaviour Society & International Ethological Conference<br />

Bloomington, USA, 25.– 30. July 2011<br />

Further details: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Ebehav11/<br />

31


13th Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology<br />

Tübingen, Germany, 20. – 25. August 2011<br />

Further details: www.eseb2011.de/index.htm<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

32


Grant and promotion opportunities for members<br />

Niko‐Tinbergen‐award<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

The <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> awards the Niko Tinbergen Prize every other year for<br />

outstanding post‐doc level researchers in behavioural biology or closely related fields. The<br />

award entails:<br />

1. A certificate stating the name of the candidate. The certificate is signed by the<br />

president of the society;<br />

2. A cheque of 1,500 Euro which is donated by the journal Ethology.<br />

The candidate should have been member of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> for at least two<br />

years. Key papers must have been written in English and published in peer reviewed<br />

journals. In case of multiple authorships, the contributions of the candidate need to be<br />

stated in the nomination.<br />

Any member of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong> is eligible to nominate candidates. A<br />

nomination needs to include a brief summary of the candidate's scientific achievements, a<br />

curriculum vitae and a list of three outstanding publications. Nominations need to be sent to<br />

the manager of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>. The committee in charge of judging<br />

applications consists of the council and extended council of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>,<br />

but other members of the society may be asked to join the committee.<br />

The deadline for the nomination of the next award is 31. December 2011. The Tinbergen<br />

award 2009 was given at this meeting to Dr. Katharina Hirschenauser at the Max Planck<br />

Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany. Award winners are asked to write a short<br />

summary of their research for the next Etho News.<br />

also see: http://www.ethol‐ges.org/advancement/tinbergen.aspx<br />

33


Research funds<br />

Activities and Meetings<br />

The goal of funding is to support<br />

• Particularly promising pilot studies or investigations at an early stage that would not<br />

normally be eligible to funding from governmental organizations or science foundations.<br />

• High quality small projects or complementing research that otherwise stands little chances<br />

of being funded because of its small scale (despite of its value).<br />

• Applicants need to be actively involved in the project.<br />

Deadlines for submission are 1 st January and 31 st July in each year. Applications have to be<br />

sent by email to the manager (Jürgen Heinze). The EG provides a total of 2000 Euro for the<br />

research fund each year.<br />

For further details (in German) see: http://www.ethol‐ges.org/advancement/others.aspx<br />

Research grants awarded in 2010<br />

Kristine Meise (University of Bielefeld)<br />

Einfluss sozialer Parameter auf den Fortpflanzungserfolg nicht‐territorialer Galápagos<br />

Seelöwen Männchen (Zalophus wollebaeki).<br />

Workshops and graduate student meetings<br />

Organizers of the annual 'Topical meetings of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>' will be<br />

supported with up to 1000 Euro; organizers of graduate student meetings in behavioural<br />

biology may apply for up to 500 Euro. Deadlines for submission are 1 st January and 31 st July<br />

in each year. Applications have to be sent by email to the managing director (Sylvia Kaiser).<br />

For further details (in German) see: http://www.ethol‐ges.org/advancement/others.aspx<br />

Grants for travel subsidies<br />

Members of EG without permanent income may apply for a contribution of up to 200 Euro<br />

for active participation (poster or talk) at the European meetings (ECBB) and for up to 100<br />

Euro for the 'Topical meetings of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>'. Applications should be sent<br />

to the manager (Sylvia Kaiser) at any time.<br />

For further details (in German) see: http://www.ethol‐ges.org/advancement/others.aspx<br />

34


Officers of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

Officers of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

Council<br />

Prof. Dr. Redouan Bshary (President)<br />

Institute of Zoology• Université de Neuchâtel• Rue Emile‐Argand 11• CH‐2009 Neuchâtel •<br />

Tel +41 32 7183005• redouan.bshary[a]unine.ch<br />

Prof. Dr. Peter Kappeler (Vice‐president)<br />

Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit • German Primate Center and University of<br />

Göttingen • Kellnerweg 4 • D‐37077 Göttingen • Tel +49 551 397317 • pkappel[a]gwdg.de<br />

Prof. Dr. Sylvia Kaiser (Manager)<br />

Department of Animal Behavior • University of Münster • Badestr. 13 • D–48149 Münster •<br />

Tel +49‐251‐8324676 • kaisesy[a]uni‐muenster.de<br />

Dr. Elke Scheibler (Treasurer)<br />

Department of Physiology • University of Stuttgart • Pfaffenwaldring 57 • D‐70550 Stuttgart<br />

• +49‐711‐685‐65004 • elke.scheibler[a]bio.uni‐stuttgart.de<br />

Dr. Claudia Fichtel (Secretary)<br />

Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit • German Primate Center • D‐37077 Göttingen • Tel<br />

+49 551 3851467 • claudia.fichtel[a]gwdg.de<br />

Extended Council<br />

Prof. Dr. Thomas Bugnyar<br />

Department of Cognitive Biology • University of Vienna • Althanstraße 14 •<br />

A‐1090 Wien • Tel +43‐1‐4277‐54446 • thomas.bugnyar[a]univie.ac.at<br />

PD Dr. Wolfgang Goymann<br />

Behavioral Neurobiology • Max Planck Institut für Ornithlogy • Eberhard‐Gwinner‐Straße<br />

Haus Nr. 6 • D‐82319 Seewiesen • Tel.: +49‐8157‐932301 • goyman[a]orn.mpg.de<br />

Prof. Dr. Charlotte Hemelrijk<br />

Theoretical Biology Group • Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies • University of<br />

Groningen • Kerklaam 30 • NL 9751 Harem • +31 50 7638084 • c.k.hemelrijk[a]rug.nl<br />

Prof. Dr. Silke Kipper<br />

Department of Animal Behavior • University of Berlin • Takustr. 6 • D‐14195 Berlin •<br />

Tel +49‐30‐838 53468 • silkip[a]zedat.fu‐berlin.de<br />

Dr. Judith Korb<br />

Department of Animal Behavior • University of Osnabrück • Barbarastr. 11•<br />

D‐49076 Osnabrück • Tel +49‐541‐969 3496 • Judith.Korb[a]biologie.uni‐osnabrueck.de<br />

Prof. Dr. Marc Naguib<br />

Institute of Ecology P.O. • Box 40 6666 • ZG Heteren • The Netherlands •<br />

Tel: +31 264791 255 • m.naguib[a]nioo.knaw.nl<br />

Prof. Dr. Jutta Schneider<br />

Department of Animal Behavior • Biozentrum Grindel und Zoologisches Museum •<br />

University of Hamburg • Martin‐Luther‐King Platz 3 • D‐20146 Hamburg •<br />

Tel.: +49‐40‐428383878 • Jutta.Schneider[a]uni‐hamburg.de<br />

PD Dr. Barbara Taborsky<br />

Institute of Ecology and Evolution • University of Bern • Baltzerstrasse 6 • CH‐3012 Bern •<br />

Tel: +41 31 631 91 57 • barbara.taborsky[a]iee.unibe.ch<br />

35


Officers of the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

Animal Ethics Commissioners<br />

Prof. Dr. Hanno Würbel (Coordinator)<br />

Universität Giessen • Institut für Veterinärphysiologie • Frankfurterstr. 104 • DE–35392<br />

Giessen Tel: +49 641 99 38751• hanno.würbel[a]vetmed.uni‐giessen.de<br />

Ass. Prof. Dr. Eva Millesi<br />

Universität Wien • Institut für Zoologie • Althanstr. 14 • A–1090 Wien Tel: +43 1 4277<br />

54465• eva.millesi[a]univie.ac.at<br />

Teaching Commissioner<br />

Prof. Dr. Klaudia Witte<br />

Institut für Ökologie & Verhaltensbiologie • Universität Siegen • Adolf‐Reichwein‐Str. 2<br />

• 57068 Siegen Tel: +49 0271‐740‐3297, witte[a]biologie.uni‐siegen.de<br />

36


Internet Links<br />

Internet Links<br />

<strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>:<br />

http://www.ethol‐ges.org<br />

Our new webpage provides information on the <strong>Ethologische</strong> <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>. It provides<br />

information on the societies' funds for research and young scientists, links to other societies<br />

supporting research in animal behaviour, scientific meetings and job offers.<br />

Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour (ASAB)<br />

http://asab.nottingham.ac.uk/<br />

Webpage of the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour (ASAB, UK): This is one of the<br />

most comprehensive websites of all European societies in behavioural biology<br />

Netherlands Society of Behavioural Biology (NVG)<br />

http://www.gedragsbiologie.org/<br />

Webpage of the Netherlands Society of Behavioural Biology (NVG, NL):<br />

International Society for Behavioral Ecology<br />

http://web.unbc.ca/isbe/<br />

Webpage of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology with links to their journal<br />

Behavioral Ecology.<br />

Deutsche Zoologische <strong>Gesellschaft</strong><br />

http://www.dzg‐ev.de/<br />

Webpage der Deutschen Zoologischen <strong>Gesellschaft</strong>.<br />

Ethology<br />

http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0179‐1613&site=1<br />

Webpage of ETHOLOGY, the official journal of the EG. Here you will find online access to the<br />

journal, access to manuscript submission, and you can sign up for the electronic alerting<br />

service (e‐tocs). If your library has no electronic subscription to the journal, you get special<br />

conditions as an EG‐member (e.g. 30 Euro or 20 Pounds for one year online access).<br />

Nature Science Update<br />

http://www.nature.com/news<br />

Nature Science Update – media releases of scientific research or the general public.<br />

New Scientist.<br />

http://www.newscientist.com/news.ns<br />

News from the Journal New Scientist.<br />

for more links see:<br />

http://www.ethol‐ges.org/links.aspx<br />

37


Miscellaneous<br />

Your contact details<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

We have difficulties reaching some members of the Ethological Society who have changed<br />

addresses in recent years. Thus, please notify us when you have changed your mailing or<br />

email address!!:<br />

To do so, please contact Dr. Elke Scheibler (Treasurer), elke.scheibler[a]bio.uni‐stuttgart.de.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!