MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 4.6. The Relative Error* (%) in the Corrected General Asymptotic Solution<br />
for the Langmuir Rate Equation<br />
1/(1+KC s)<br />
M T 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00<br />
0.125 0.019 -0.030 0.163 0.485 1.133<br />
0.25 0.016 -0.158 0.375 1.354 0.001<br />
0.5 -0.013 -0.729 -0.113 1.208 1.394<br />
0.707 -0.076 -1.161 -0.849 0.128 -1.246<br />
1 -0.215 -1.387 -1.197 0.076 1.374<br />
2 -0.491 -1.178 -1.136 -0.324 0.545<br />
4 -0.679 -1.068 -1.256 -1.243 -1.144<br />
8 -0.933 -1.153 -1.337 -1.494 -1.743<br />
*Relative error = ( asymp - numerical)/ numerical<br />
** asym = exact when 1/(1+KC s) = 1.0<br />
Simplified General Moduli for the Langmuir Rate Equation<br />
The standard general modulus in Eq. (4.3) is complex in form, and encounters<br />
division by zero at KC s = 0. However, the value of M T in Eq. (4.3) exists in the limit at<br />
KC s = 0:<br />
M T = L<br />
ok1 De . (4.23)<br />
which is the Thiele modulus for first order reactions (Thiele, 1939). Two moduli that<br />
have simpler forms were found to closely approximate the standard general modulus in<br />
Eq. (4.3). The first one was transformed from a modulus used by Levenspiel (1993):<br />
M T = L<br />
O k 0 K / D e<br />
2KC s + 1<br />
= L<br />
Ok1 / De . (4.24)<br />
2KCs +1<br />
The second modulus was constructed to better approximate the standard general modulus<br />
in Eq. (4.3) in this study:<br />
39