24.08.2013 Views

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

temperature profile of the post-flame gases and the residence time of the particles are<br />

kept relatively constant from condition to condition.<br />

Mass Release<br />

The mass release of char is commonly normalized by the original mass of the coal<br />

on a dry, ash-free (daf) basis. The mass release is determined by assuming mass<br />

conservation of one of the following elements or material: Al, Ti, Si, and ash. It can also<br />

be determined by overall mass balance, i.e., by the amount of char collected and the<br />

amount of coal fed in the experiment. In this project the mass release of a char is<br />

determined using all five of these methods. In most cases, these five methods produced<br />

relatively consistent values of mass release. In this analysis, the average values of the<br />

mass releases based on Ti and Al conservation were used for the calculation of the high<br />

temperature reactivity of Koonfontain chars made under conditions #2 and #4, since the<br />

mass releases based on Si were sometimes subject to question.<br />

The mass release data from Table A.4 are plotted in Figure A.2. It can be seen<br />

that for both Koonfontain and Middleburg coals, the mass release of char #2 (CH 4, fuel-<br />

lean) is higher than that of char #1 (CH 4, fuel-rich), and the mass release of char #4 (CO,<br />

fuel-lean) is higher than that of char #3 (CO, fuel-lean). In other words, the presence of<br />

oxygen in the preparation environments increases the mass release of the char, as expected<br />

due to the initiation of char oxidation in the fuel-lean reactor conditions.<br />

The decrease of steam concentration did not seem to affect mass release of chars in<br />

fuel-lean conditions (#3 vs. #1), but seemed to decrease mass release slightly in fuel-rich<br />

conditions (#4 vs. #2).<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!