24.08.2013 Views

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The HP-CBK was used to predict the burnouts for all the experiments conducted at 1, 5,<br />

10 and 15 atm, using the above-mentioned gas temperature and wall temperature profiles.<br />

The experiments conducted at 15 atm had extremely low wall temperatures (e.g., 631 K)<br />

and low gas temperatures (e.g., 987 K), and hence were not considered due to ignition<br />

problems. Ignition problems were also observed by other researchers. For example, Field<br />

(1969) observed that a 38-μm char sample was not ignited at low gas temperature and<br />

wall temperature (< 1230 K).<br />

Results<br />

In minimizing the standard deviation of model predictions, two observations were<br />

made: 1) The Langmuir rate equation reduced to the zero-th order equation, implying an<br />

apparent reaction order of 0.5 in Zone II; and 2) The diffusivity contributed from<br />

micropores can be neglected compared to that from the macropores.<br />

The kinetic and pore structure parameters used in this study are listed in Table<br />

7.6. The best-fit calculations of burnouts from the HP-CBK are compared with the<br />

experimental measurements in Figures 7.6 and 7.7. The HP-CBK model was able to<br />

predict particle burnouts with a standard deviation of 14% and a maximum error of 36%.<br />

Table 7.6. Parameters Used in Modeling the Data by Monson (1992).<br />

A 0 = 2.42 × 10 3 mol/cm 3 /sec E 0 = 21.7 kcal/mol<br />

Total Porosity = 0.5 (Pre-set) Macro-porosity M = 0.25<br />

Macro-pore radius r p1 = 2000 Å (Pre-set)<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!