24.08.2013 Views

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The second and third findings mean that the effective diffusivity is only determined by<br />

the macro-porosity (ε M):<br />

2<br />

De = MDO2,<br />

N2 =1.523 × 10 −5 1.67<br />

Tp 102<br />

2<br />

M / P (7.12)<br />

These three findings greatly simplified the model and reduced the number of adjustable<br />

parameters to three: A 0, E 0, and M. The best-fit kinetic and pore structure parameters are<br />

listed in Table 7.4. By using this set of parameters, the HP-CBK model was able to<br />

quantitatively explain the effects of all six experimental variables: total pressure, oxygen<br />

partial pressure, oxygen mole fraction, gas velocity, gas temperature, and particle size<br />

with a standard deviation of 14% and a maximum error of 22% (see Appendix B). The<br />

resulting comparison of the HP-CBK model to the experimental data is shown in Figure 4.<br />

Table 7.4. Parameters Used in Modeling the Data by Mathias.<br />

A 0 = 0.75 mol/cm 3 /sec E 0 = 18.2 kcal/mol<br />

Porosity = 0.65 (Calculated and Pre-set)<br />

Macroporosity ε M = 0.28<br />

The activation energy E 0 seems low compared the values observed for pulverized<br />

char oxidation. However, these char particles were prepared from large coal particles and<br />

might differ from the char prepared from small particles in reactivity and pore structure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!