MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The value of the roughness factor was pre-set to be 5, which seemed high<br />
compared to the value of 2.5 used by Banin et al. (1997). Following the argument of<br />
Banin et al. (1997), the roughness factor accounts not only for the increased surface area<br />
due to surface roughness, but also for penetration of oxygen molecules within a pore<br />
before the first collision with the pore wall. The latter mechanism means internal<br />
diffusion does not play any role up to a distance equal to about the pore diameter. Figure<br />
7.2 illustrates how this latter mechanism makes one unit of void surface area equivalent to<br />
4 units of solid surface area.<br />
Figure 7.2. Schematic of a pore connected to the surface of a char particle. One unit of<br />
void area is equivalent to 4 units of solid area since internal diffusion does<br />
not play any role up to a distance equal to about the pore diameter.<br />
The void area of a pore mouth is πr p 2 , while the internal pore wall that is not<br />
affected by internal diffusion and must be counted as external surface area is 2πr p •2r p =<br />
4πr p 2 . Assuming that the surface roughness increases the surface area by a factor of 2, the<br />
overall roughness factor can be calculated from the porosity of the particle: 2[(1- ) + 4 ]<br />
93<br />
2r p<br />
r p<br />
O 2<br />
O 2<br />
O 2<br />
O2