24.08.2013 Views

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The value of the roughness factor was pre-set to be 5, which seemed high<br />

compared to the value of 2.5 used by Banin et al. (1997). Following the argument of<br />

Banin et al. (1997), the roughness factor accounts not only for the increased surface area<br />

due to surface roughness, but also for penetration of oxygen molecules within a pore<br />

before the first collision with the pore wall. The latter mechanism means internal<br />

diffusion does not play any role up to a distance equal to about the pore diameter. Figure<br />

7.2 illustrates how this latter mechanism makes one unit of void surface area equivalent to<br />

4 units of solid surface area.<br />

Figure 7.2. Schematic of a pore connected to the surface of a char particle. One unit of<br />

void area is equivalent to 4 units of solid area since internal diffusion does<br />

not play any role up to a distance equal to about the pore diameter.<br />

The void area of a pore mouth is πr p 2 , while the internal pore wall that is not<br />

affected by internal diffusion and must be counted as external surface area is 2πr p •2r p =<br />

4πr p 2 . Assuming that the surface roughness increases the surface area by a factor of 2, the<br />

overall roughness factor can be calculated from the porosity of the particle: 2[(1- ) + 4 ]<br />

93<br />

2r p<br />

r p<br />

O 2<br />

O 2<br />

O 2<br />

O2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!