24.08.2013 Views

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

MODELING CHAR OXIDATION AS A FUNCTION OF PRESSURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

List of Figures<br />

Figure 2.1. Rate-controlling zones for heterogeneous char oxidation………………….6<br />

Figure 2.2. The effectiveness factor curves for first order and zeroth order reactions<br />

in Cartesian Coordinates..………………………………………………. 19<br />

Figure 4.1. The effectiveness factor curves for first order and zeroth order reactions<br />

in Cartesian Coordinates………………………………………………… 28<br />

Figure 4.2. Effectiveness factor curves for first order and zeroth order reactions in<br />

spherical coordinates……………………………………………………..34<br />

Figure 4.3. The correction function f c plotted as a function of both the general<br />

modulus (M T ) and the observed reaction order in Zone I (m obs )………….38<br />

Figure 5.1. The relationship between KC s and the observed reaction order (n obs ) as<br />

predicted by Eq. (5.13)………..…………………………………………50<br />

Figure 5.2. Illustration of how internal combustion can decrease the particle<br />

diameter………………..……………………………………………….. 60<br />

Figure 7.1. Comparison of predictions of carbon reactivity with graphite flake data<br />

(Ranish and Walker, 1993) obtained as a function of P O2 and T p ………..89<br />

Figure 7.2. Schematic of a pore connected to the surface of a char particle…………..93<br />

Figure 7.3. Schematic of High Pressure Controlled-Profile (HPCP) drop-tube<br />

reactor…………………………………………………………………… 97<br />

Figure 7.4. Comparison of the HP-CBK predictions of reaction rate with large<br />

coal char particle data (Mathias, 1992) as a function of a) V g, b) P O2<br />

(P tot = 0.85 atm), c) P tot (x O2 = 21%), d) P tot (P O2 = 0.18 atm), e) d p,<br />

f) T g…………..…………………………………………………………103<br />

Figure 7.5. The gas temperature profiles for different total pressures……………….108<br />

Figure 7.6. Comparison of HP-CBK predictions of carbon burnouts with<br />

pulverized coal char data (Monson, 1992) at total pressures of 1, 5,<br />

and 10 atm………………………………………………………………110<br />

Figure 7.7. Comparison of HP-CBK predictions of carbon burnouts with<br />

pulverized coal char data (Monson, 1992) at a total pressure of 15 atm.. 110<br />

Figure A.1. Schematic of the flat-flame burner and the particle collection and<br />

separation system……………….………………………………………144<br />

xi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!