NONLINEAR CONTROLLER COMPARISON ON A BENCHMARK ...
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER COMPARISON ON A BENCHMARK ...
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER COMPARISON ON A BENCHMARK ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 2.2: Mechanical Model of Flexible Beam System,<br />
The exible beam is treated as capable only of motion in the plane of the diagram.<br />
If perturbed the free end of the beam will oscillate according to the classical beam<br />
equation:<br />
A(x) @2 w(x t)<br />
@t 2<br />
+ @2<br />
@x 2 [EI(x)@2 w(x t)<br />
@x 2 ]=f(x t) (2.1)<br />
where f(x t) is the applied force on the beam in the y direction,and w(x t) is the<br />
de ection of a point a distance x from the xed end at time = t. Unfortunately, the<br />
partial derivatives in this equation are not suitable for the state-space model that we<br />
seek, something of the form:<br />
where x 2 IR n .<br />
_x = f(x)+g(x)u(x) (2.2)<br />
A simpler idea would be to model the exible beam as a rigid beam with a<br />
single torsional spring at the xed end (see Figure 2.3). A state-space equation can<br />
be obtained for this model using the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations:<br />
d<br />
dt (@Lp(qp qp) _<br />
) ;<br />
@qp _<br />
@Lp(qp qp) _<br />
= Mup<br />
@qp<br />
9<br />
(2.3)