24.08.2013 Views

Part 2 - Eskom

Part 2 - Eskom

Part 2 - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED 40MW OPEN CYCLE GAS TURBINE POWER<br />

PLANT IN THE AMERSFOORT AREA, MPUMALANGA<br />

• Potential Impacts on Geohydrology<br />

Peer Review: Reinie Meyer (Private)<br />

Bohlweki-SSI Environmental<br />

This study will entail a peer review of the geohydrological report compiled for the<br />

study area, making informed assessments as to the repercussions of the proposed<br />

OCGT power plant on the groundwater resources locally and regionally with a view of<br />

both the primary and secondary effects.<br />

• Potential Impacts on Hydrology<br />

Peer Review: Chris Waygood (Jones and Wagner)<br />

This study will entail a peer review of the hydrological report compiled for the study<br />

area, making informed assessments as to the repercussions of the proposed OCGT<br />

power plant on the surface water resources locally and regionally with a view of both<br />

the primary and secondary effects.<br />

• Potential Impacts on Wetlands<br />

Specialist input: Paul da Cruz – SiVEST<br />

The desktop level assessment has identified that wetlands are distributed across the<br />

study area site, comprising 47.6% of the areas of the study site. All wetlands<br />

occurring on the site are sensitive features of the natural environment, and should be<br />

protected from any adverse affect/impact due to the proposed development. The<br />

proposed UCG plant and associated infrastructure has been scoped in terms of the<br />

possible impact on wetlands, using the list of infrastructure provided as the basis on<br />

which to identify impacts. This has been done across all life stages of the project,<br />

from construction to post-closure. It should be noted that at this stage of the project<br />

no potential layouts/alignments of infrastructure are available for assessment.<br />

As part of the technical project information provided by the proponent, the mining<br />

areas will not be located within any wetland area, or within a buffer delineated around<br />

all wetlands on the study site, nor will any wetland areas be undermined. It has been<br />

assumed that the same principle will be applied to the locating of infrastructure and<br />

the plant itself (although certain linear infrastructure will have to cross wetlands as<br />

described below). This factor greatly reduces the potential for the plant and<br />

associated infrastructure as well as surface mining-related operations to directly<br />

impact (physically alter) wetlands.<br />

A policy of zero-discharges to the receiving environment also reduces the potential<br />

impacts for discharges from the plant to potentially pollute wetlands. A set of<br />

proposed linear infrastructure, including a power line, raw water pipeline, and access<br />

roads would likely need to cross wetlands, thus potentially physically affecting them.<br />

The nature of the design and mitigation measures adopted, as well as alignment will<br />

determine the degree of potential impact of this linear infrastructure on wetlands.<br />

More detail regarding the layout of the proposed plant is required for further, more<br />

detailed assessment and identification of potential impacts associated with the<br />

proposed plant and required mitigation measures in the EIA phase. If alignments of<br />

proposed linear infrastructure are provided for assessment, these will be able to be<br />

assessed in terms of their potential impact upon wetlands, and any design or re-<br />

E02.JNB.000308<br />

ESKOM HOLDINGS LIMITED<br />

01<br />

112<br />

08/10/2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!