24.08.2013 Views

Part 2 - Eskom

Part 2 - Eskom

Part 2 - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED 40MW OPEN CYCLE GAS TURBINE POWER<br />

PLANT IN THE AMERSFOORT AREA, MPUMALANGA<br />

Bohlweki-SSI Environmental<br />

As the plant would contain materials which could potentially act as pollutants to<br />

surface water resources, the proper post-operation rehabilitation and removal of any<br />

material that could cause pollution of water resources through seepage or<br />

stormwater runoff is important. Should this not be undertaken, or improperly<br />

undertaken, a residual impact related to the plant and its infrastructure such as<br />

fuel/hydrocarbon storage tanks or wastewater storage dams on surface water<br />

resources could result. The risk of this impact depends on the proximity of<br />

infrastructure to surface water receptors, and to links between groundwater and<br />

surface water resources in the case of seepage of pollutants into the ground that may<br />

pollute groundwater.<br />

Decommissioning of mining areas after the 5-year operational life of the particular<br />

mining area could result in ‘knock-on’ impacts on wetlands, if the decommissioning of<br />

these mining areas is not properly undertaken. These mining areas would not be<br />

located within wetlands or their associated buffers; however any residual impacts of<br />

mining activities such as development of soil erosion or improperly maintained roads<br />

may result in secondary impacts on nearby wetlands through the extension of<br />

erosion into the wetland or deposition of silt into the wetlands. Similarly any potential<br />

pollutants such as fuels/hydrocarbons left within the mining footprint may cause<br />

pollution of surface water resources through stormwater runoff. The risk of<br />

decommissioning residual impacts on wetlands is minimised the further away mining<br />

areas are located from wetlands.<br />

8.7. Soils and Agricultural Potential<br />

The interpretation of the land use, land capability and reconnaissance soil survey<br />

results yielded a number of aspects that are of importance to the project.<br />

8.7.1. Agricultural Potential<br />

The agricultural potential of the site varies due to soils conditions. Large areas are<br />

covered by shallow soils that are of low potential. The higher potential soils have to a<br />

large extent already been tilled and are currently being used for dryland agriculture.<br />

The potential of the areas under crop production varies from low to high due to a<br />

range of soil conditions. In many cases these soils are structured and of high clay<br />

content but of limited depth. The main land use is grazing and it is also this land use<br />

that is considered to be the most viable for the bulk of the area.<br />

8.7.2. Overall Soil Impacts<br />

The overall impacts on the soil of the site due to the proposed project are not<br />

significant; however, impacts associated with the mining activities on the core farms<br />

are significant.<br />

Due to the dominantly low agricultural potential of the site, the broader significance of<br />

these impacts is not considered to be significant and impacts will therefore be<br />

localised to the immediate site.<br />

E02.JNB.000308<br />

ESKOM HOLDINGS LIMITED<br />

01<br />

67<br />

08/10/2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!