Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scores (out of 100, for both water and air) Weighting factors (in percentage) Subtotal score =75*20%+80*15%+85*15%+70*50% Table 9 Example for program evaluation from environmental aspects 9.2.3 Social Aspects one ESO 75 80 85 70 20% 15% 15% 50% Table 10 is an example on the evaluation of the social aspects. The energy manager and the HR department jointly work together and propose the job creation aspects of an energy efficiency project. These are elaborated as the number of new jobs (T), specificities about human resources needs (E), interrelations in the workplace (O), and the ability to perform, given work environment, resources available (P). An energy evaluation panel could decide on appraisal based on the absolute new job count (T), the job description, standards, evaluation methods, level of education required, permanent or temporary position (E), organogram, defined responsibility, communication channels, develop or improve orientation program for new employees (O), and work environment (P). Social aspects Technology Equipment Operation Performance Quality of jobs Number of new jobs Items considered in scoring job quality Absolute new job count Specificities about human resource needs Assessment or development of job description, standards, evaluation methods, level of education required, permanent or temporary position. Subtotal score =80*25%+75*35%+60*20%+65*20% Table 10 Example for program evaluation from social aspects 28 Interrelations in the workplace Organogram, defined responsibilities, communication channels. Development or improvement of orientation program for new employees Scores (out of 100) 80 75 60 65 Weighting factors (in percentage) 25% 35% 20% 20% Ability to perform, given work environment, resources available. Assessment of work environment
9.2.4 Economic Aspects Table 11 is an example to evaluate the economic aspects. In this example, it is proposed that the local contents are evaluated. Economic aspects Technology Equipment Operation Performance Local content Higher levels of locally manufactured technology. Are we using as much local content as possible? Items which might be considered in scoring (e.g. pre‐ and post‐ implementation data and impact from the program (savings, etc.)) Scores (out of 100, for both water and air) Weighting factors (in percentage) Pre‐ and post‐ assessment of percentage of imported and local technologies and parts in plant. Use of isolated parts locally produced. Increased use of local content Subtotal score =75*20%+80*15%+85*15%+70*50% Table 11 Example for program evaluation from economic aspects 29 Locally produced parts are compatible with imported ones Compatibility and communication to local manufacturers of needs 75 80 85 70 20% 15% 15% 50% Identify possibilities for local manufacture Assessment of local manufacturing opportunities, identification of gaps, and communication to manufacturing plants
Page 1 and 2: Energy efficiency and Demand Side M
Page 3 and 4: List of tables Table 1 Program eval
Page 5 and 6: from the engineering and environmen
Page 7 and 8: 3) They quantify results and cost
Page 9 and 10: 5.1 Objective The purpose of this g
Page 11 and 12: the energy system could be reached
Page 13 and 14: 6.1.2 Environmental Aspects Environ
Page 15 and 16: It is important to consider the soc
Page 17 and 18: Energy saved (500 MWh) CO2 reductio
Page 19 and 20: eporting period. Details on the fre
Page 21 and 22: 9 Appendix 9.1 Appendix 1: Guidance
Page 23 and 24: waste in a sanitary way. Access to
Page 25 and 26: Issues Description Possible paramet
Page 27: In the evaluation of a general prog

Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?