Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

Scores (out of 100, for
both water and air)
Weighting factors (in
percentage)
Subtotal score =75*20%+80*15%+85*15%+70*50%
Table 9 Example for program evaluation from environmental aspects
9.2.3 Social Aspects
one ESO
75 80 85 70
20% 15% 15% 50%
Table 10 is an example on the evaluation of the social aspects. The energy manager and the HR
department jointly work together and propose the job creation aspects of an energy efficiency
project. These are elaborated as the number of new jobs (T), specificities about human resources
needs (E), interrelations in the workplace (O), and the ability to perform, given work environment,
resources available (P). An energy evaluation panel could decide on appraisal based on the absolute
new job count (T), the job description, standards, evaluation methods, level of education required,
permanent or temporary position (E), organogram, defined responsibility, communication channels,
develop or improve orientation program for new employees (O), and work environment (P).
Social aspects Technology Equipment Operation Performance
Quality of jobs Number of new
jobs
Items considered in
scoring job quality
Absolute new job
count
Specificities
about human
resource needs
Assessment or
development of
job description,
standards,
evaluation
methods, level
of education
required,
permanent or
temporary
position.
Subtotal score =80*25%+75*35%+60*20%+65*20%
Table 10 Example for program evaluation from social aspects
28
Interrelations
in the
workplace
Organogram,
defined
responsibilities,
communication
channels.
Development
or
improvement
of orientation
program for
new
employees
Scores (out of 100) 80 75 60 65
Weighting factors (in
percentage)
25% 35% 20% 20%
Ability to
perform,
given work
environment,
resources
available.
Assessment
of work
environment