Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8 References [1] American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings, Guideline 14‐2002, Atlanta, Georgia, 2002. [2] M.A. Aguado‐Monsonet, Evaluation of the socio‐economic impacts of renewable energies: Global survey to decision‐makers, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Spain, 1998. [3] California Public Utilities Commission, California Standard Practice Manual: Economic analysis of Demand‐Side Programs and Projects, 2001. [4] W. C. Clark II, A. Sowell, and D. Schultz, The standard practice manual: the economic analysis of demand‐side programs and projects in California, Int. J. Revenue Management, 2002. [5] Ecofys, TÜV‐SÜD and FIELD, Guidance on Sustainability Assessment (Gold Standard Toolkit 2.0), July 2008, p. 126‐130. [6] Efficiency Valuation Organization, International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol, vol. 1, 2010. [7] Eskom, The Measurement and Verification Guideline for Energy Efficiency and Demand‐Side Management Projects and Programmes, 2009. [8] Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Best Practices Guide: Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, Verification, and Certification of Climate Change Mitigation Projects, United States Agency for International Development, November 2000. [9] H. Mæng, Beskæftigelses‐ og Eksportvirkninger ved Dansk Energipolitik – Eksemplificeret ved vindkraft, solvarme, biogas samt decentral kraftvarme på naturgas (Effects of Danish Energy Policy on Employment and Export – Exemplified in the case of wind power, solar heating, biogas and decentralised combined heat and power using natural gas), Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, Instituttets skriftserie nr. 223, 1998. [10] J. Munksgaard and A. Larsen, Socio‐economic assessment of wind power‐lessons from Denmark, Energy Policy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 85‐93, 1998. [11] South African Bureau of Standards, Measurement and Verification of Energy Saving, Technical Specification, SABS Standards Division, ISBN: 978‐0‐626‐23668‐7, 2010. [12] TecMarket Works Team, California Energy Efficiency Evaluation Protocols: Technical, Methodological, and Reporting Requirements for Evaluation Professionals, California Public Utilities Commission, April 2006. [13] University of Saarland USAAR, Specification of the methodology for the measurement and validation of the socio‐economic impact of the pilots, D1.3, Best Energy Project, December 2009. [14] USDOE, M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Version 2.2, 2000. [15] X Xia and J Zhang, Energy Efficiency and Control Systems‐from a POET perspective, IFAC Conference on Control Methodologies and Technology for Energy Efficiency, Portugal, 29‐31 March 2010. [16] X Xia and J Zhang, Energy Auditing—from a POET Perspective, International Conference on Applied Energy, Singapore, 21‐23 April 2010. [17] X Xia and J Zhang, Modeling and Control of Heavy Haul Trains, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, to appear in August 2011, doi: 10.1109/MCS.2011.941403. 20
9 Appendix 9.1 Appendix 1: Guidance on Sustainability Assessment The following descriptions on key issues in Program Evaluation taken from [5] are helpful for program evaluators to determine which issues will be needed for the evaluation of a particular program. Issues Description Possible parameters Environment Air quality Air quality refers to changes compared to the baseline in: Pollution of indoor and outdoor air which may have a negative impact on human health or the environment, including particulates, NOx, SOx, lead, carbon monoxide, ozone, POPs, mercury, CFCs, Halons. Also odour is considered to be a form of air pollution. Water quality and quantity Pollution with gases covered under the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorinated carbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).) Are not included in this category as this category refers to changes in the environment in addition to reductions of greenhouse gases since GHG reductions are included in all greenhouse gas reduction projects by definition. Water quality and quantity refer to t changes compared to the baseline in: Release of pollutants and changes in water balance and availability in ground‐ and surface water and its impacts on the environment and human health, including biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand, thermal pollution, mercury, SOx, NOx, POPs, lead, coliforms (bacteria from animal waste) Soil condition Soil condition refers to changes compared to the baseline in: Pollution of soils, pollution of soils can be 21 NOx SOx Lead CO Ozone POPs Mercury CFCs Halons Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM) NH3 SO2 NO2 PM10 VOC Total Suspended Particulate Matter (TSPM) Levels of : Biological oxygen demand Biochemical oxygen demand Thermal pollution mercury SOx NOx POPs lead coliforms (bacteria from animal waste) Levels of : Lead SOx NOx
Page 1 and 2: Energy efficiency and Demand Side M
Page 3 and 4: List of tables Table 1 Program eval
Page 5 and 6: from the engineering and environmen
Page 7 and 8: 3) They quantify results and cost
Page 9 and 10: 5.1 Objective The purpose of this g
Page 11 and 12: the energy system could be reached
Page 13 and 14: 6.1.2 Environmental Aspects Environ
Page 15 and 16: It is important to consider the soc
Page 17 and 18: Energy saved (500 MWh) CO2 reductio
Page 19: eporting period. Details on the fre
Page 23 and 24: waste in a sanitary way. Access to
Page 25 and 26: Issues Description Possible paramet
Page 27 and 28: In the evaluation of a general prog
Page 29: 9.2.4 Economic Aspects Table 11 is

Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?