Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom
Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom
Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
It is important to consider the social impacts <strong>and</strong> other social contributors for each project planned.<br />
The identified issues might not all have an equal priority, but weighting would assist in delineating<br />
the most important issues to be taken up into an actual social survey.<br />
Social aspects Technology Equipment Operation Performance<br />
Social issues of a program<br />
(e.g. employment,<br />
governance, stakeholder<br />
<strong>and</strong> community<br />
participation, health,<br />
safety <strong>and</strong> security,<br />
Intergenerational equity,<br />
etc.)<br />
Items which might be<br />
considered in scoring (e.g.<br />
pre‐ <strong>and</strong> post‐<br />
implementation data <strong>and</strong><br />
impact from the program)<br />
Scores (out of 100)<br />
Weighting factors (in<br />
percentage)<br />
Subtotal score<br />
6.1.4 Economic Aspects<br />
Table 3 <strong>Program</strong> evaluation of social aspects<br />
Economic aspects should be assessed in a similar fashion suggested in the above. Saving energy <strong>and</strong><br />
simultaneously improving production would yield economic improvements. The economic aspects<br />
that could include balance payments of investments, life‐cycle generation costs, local content of the<br />
system <strong>and</strong> assessments of the risk <strong>and</strong> prospects of a specific project.<br />
Each issue will be evaluated by certain criteria from properly chosen POET related indicators. For<br />
example, the local content could be assessed as such: proportion of local content now, or for the first<br />
plant (T); prospects for increasing local content of a future plant (this is particularly pertinent to the<br />
scenario as a whole are technologies to be deployed at sufficient rate to justify local manufacture)<br />
(E); dependence on imported parts <strong>and</strong> systems (O); <strong>and</strong> the type of technology use in the plant (P).<br />
Other such examples include:<br />
Costs: life‐cycle generation costs; other system infrastructure<br />
Financial / Price risk: probability of cost over‐runs subsequent to contracting (track record of<br />
technology); exposure to fuel price volatility <strong>and</strong> escalation over medium to long term (short<br />
term covered under security of supply); exposure to carbon pricing/border taxes (note: this is<br />
not double‐counting GHGs as it does not relate to the impact of atmospheric pollution);<br />
state/public exposure to liability;<br />
Financing prospects: eligibility for development <strong>and</strong>/or climate finance;<br />
prospects/attractiveness for private equity; compatibility with long‐term national savings<br />
(e.g. investment by pension funds);<br />
15