24.08.2013 Views

Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

Energy efficiency and Demand Side Management Program ... - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is important to consider the social impacts <strong>and</strong> other social contributors for each project planned.<br />

The identified issues might not all have an equal priority, but weighting would assist in delineating<br />

the most important issues to be taken up into an actual social survey.<br />

Social aspects Technology Equipment Operation Performance<br />

Social issues of a program<br />

(e.g. employment,<br />

governance, stakeholder<br />

<strong>and</strong> community<br />

participation, health,<br />

safety <strong>and</strong> security,<br />

Intergenerational equity,<br />

etc.)<br />

Items which might be<br />

considered in scoring (e.g.<br />

pre‐ <strong>and</strong> post‐<br />

implementation data <strong>and</strong><br />

impact from the program)<br />

Scores (out of 100)<br />

Weighting factors (in<br />

percentage)<br />

Subtotal score<br />

6.1.4 Economic Aspects<br />

Table 3 <strong>Program</strong> evaluation of social aspects<br />

Economic aspects should be assessed in a similar fashion suggested in the above. Saving energy <strong>and</strong><br />

simultaneously improving production would yield economic improvements. The economic aspects<br />

that could include balance payments of investments, life‐cycle generation costs, local content of the<br />

system <strong>and</strong> assessments of the risk <strong>and</strong> prospects of a specific project.<br />

Each issue will be evaluated by certain criteria from properly chosen POET related indicators. For<br />

example, the local content could be assessed as such: proportion of local content now, or for the first<br />

plant (T); prospects for increasing local content of a future plant (this is particularly pertinent to the<br />

scenario as a whole are technologies to be deployed at sufficient rate to justify local manufacture)<br />

(E); dependence on imported parts <strong>and</strong> systems (O); <strong>and</strong> the type of technology use in the plant (P).<br />

Other such examples include:<br />

Costs: life‐cycle generation costs; other system infrastructure<br />

Financial / Price risk: probability of cost over‐runs subsequent to contracting (track record of<br />

technology); exposure to fuel price volatility <strong>and</strong> escalation over medium to long term (short<br />

term covered under security of supply); exposure to carbon pricing/border taxes (note: this is<br />

not double‐counting GHGs as it does not relate to the impact of atmospheric pollution);<br />

state/public exposure to liability;<br />

Financing prospects: eligibility for development <strong>and</strong>/or climate finance;<br />

prospects/attractiveness for private equity; compatibility with long‐term national savings<br />

(e.g. investment by pension funds);<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!