24.08.2013 Views

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />

2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />

Table 38: Comparison of <strong>Eskom</strong> and international electricity costs in 2010 (c/kWh)<br />

Country Utility Average price (c/kWh)<br />

Malaysia TNB 190<br />

Kenya KPL 68<br />

Thailand EGAT 65<br />

South Korea Kepco 46<br />

Argentina Pampa 40<br />

South Africa <strong>Eskom</strong> 32<br />

India NTPC 32<br />

China CRPH 30<br />

Source: LTE Energy, in association with EA Energy Analysis, 2012. Information sourced from annual reports. The unit<br />

price is obtained by a basic currency conversion. There is no indication of whether these prices are cost reflective or if<br />

the utilities have a similar energy mix to <strong>Eskom</strong>. These costs exclude <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s subsequent price increases.<br />

Page 86 of 144<br />

A 2012 annual survey of electricity and natural gas prices by the NUS Consulting Group, an<br />

international energy consultancy, found that the country‟s electricity prices (in US cents per<br />

kilowatt hour) moved up from 16th place (ranked in terms of highest to lowest) in 2011 to<br />

11th place in 2012 as a result of its 23% price change in the year. South Africa was one of<br />

eight countries with increasing electricity prices. The country with the greatest increase was<br />

Australia, where electricity went up by 27.8% due to the introduction of a carbon tax<br />

(Australia also relies on coal-fired generation for much of its electricity) and increased<br />

network and infrastructure costs.<br />

Significantly, half the countries NUS surveyed – particularly those deriving a considerable<br />

portion of their power from hydroelectric schemes, natural gas and unconventional gas<br />

sources (fracking) – registered a decline in electricity prices. It should be noted, however,<br />

that almost all the countries in the NUS survey are advanced industrial countries. Their<br />

economic profile and customer needs are considerably different to those in South Africa, so<br />

there is limited scope for direct comparison.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!