24.08.2013 Views

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Phasing in price increases over five years<br />

Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />

2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />

Page 83 of 144<br />

In this application, <strong>Eskom</strong> seeks to balance the need for a sustainable electricity industry<br />

with the need for economic growth and development. Ultimately, these two objectives cannot<br />

be set in opposition. A secure supply of power is essential to enable economic growth. This,<br />

in turn, requires that the electricity industry be financially sustainable. However, this objective<br />

must be balanced against the negative economic effects of price increases. An electricity<br />

price path that migrates towards cost-reflective levels over time can best achieve the<br />

balance between these imperatives. This is a key reason why <strong>Eskom</strong> is proposing a five-<br />

year price path, rather than a three-year price path.<br />

However, phasing in electricity increases over too long a time could be just as detrimental to<br />

the economy as phasing them in too quickly. According to a study by Deloitte, the longer<br />

electricity prices are not cost reflective, the more energy the economy will demand.<br />

Unchecked, this kind of cycle would require even more investment into capacity expansion<br />

than already envisaged, for potentially little net gain in economic output. The overall<br />

economic outcome of such a situation would be negative for the country.<br />

The real costs of electricity and South Africa’s competitiveness<br />

In the past, cheap power attracted local and international investment in energy-intensive<br />

industries. At the same time, there was little or no financial motive for companies to invest in<br />

energy-efficient technologies or generate power for their own use. Consequently, according<br />

to a study by the University of Pretoria, the South African economy‟s energy intensity more<br />

than doubled between 1990 and 2007. By contrast, the energy intensity of Organisation for<br />

Economic Cooperation and Development countries increased by only 10% over the same<br />

period.<br />

South Africa now needs to invest more into new generating capacity at considerable<br />

economic cost. The “competitiveness” that cheap electricity prices lent the economy in the<br />

past arguably conferred short-term benefits at longer-term disadvantage.<br />

Economic impact<br />

This application acknowledges that the proposed electricity price increases will have several<br />

short-term impacts on the economy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!