Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />
2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />
Page 57 of 144<br />
Historic underinvestment, changes in environmental legislation and technical<br />
factors have led to higher operating costs at <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s cost-plus mines.<br />
Long distances between some power stations and the mines, especially those<br />
returned to service, have increased transportation costs.<br />
The following steps have been taken to mitigate the risks related to coal supply:<br />
<strong>Eskom</strong> has contracted a number of junior mining houses to provide coal over the<br />
short and medium term. However, many of these mines are marginal, with high<br />
investment and production costs.<br />
All major new sources of coal will be contracted for the life of the resource to<br />
minimise overall costs, reduce supply risk and create price stability.<br />
<strong>Eskom</strong> is migrating a significant portion of its current coal-transport volume from<br />
road to rail, which is significantly more cost effective in the long term.<br />
<strong>Eskom</strong> is investigating the cost implications of beneficiation, purifying coal to a<br />
level that is more suitable for <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s coal-fired generation fleet.<br />
Table 12: Type of coal contracts by volume (Mt)<br />
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 MYPD 3<br />
Existing dedicated cost-plus mines (Mt) 54 53 54 51 47 46 251<br />
Existing multi-product mines (Mt) 30 34 36 42 46 44 202<br />
New long term mines (Mt) 6 15 21 26 68<br />
Medium term mines (Mt) 44 44 37 28 27 25 161<br />
Total coal (Mt) 128 131 133 136 141 141 682<br />
Water and water treatment<br />
Water volume consumption, which depends on the amount of electricity generated, is<br />
expected to remain relatively constant over the MYPD 3 period. However, as the projections<br />
in Table 13 indicate, the unit cost of water is expected to more than double as the<br />
Department of Water Affairs expands infrastructure. The projections do not make provision<br />
for the additional 10% price increase that the department may impose to reflect water<br />
scarcity in South Africa.<br />
Table 13: Water costs and usage projections<br />
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 MYPD 3<br />
Water consumption per station (ML) 348 129 348 129 347 461 347 100 340 027 337 020 1 719 737<br />
Rand per million litres 4 400 5 982 6 947 7 533 8 088 8 768 7 452<br />
Total costs (Rm) 1 532 2 082 2 414 2 615 2 750 2 955 12 816