Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />
2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />
Page 16 of 144<br />
industry, one with the resources to operate and maintain current infrastructure while building<br />
the generating capacity necessitated by demand.<br />
Infrastructure expansion is a costly exercise that requires financing from domestic and<br />
international sources. To secure this funding, <strong>Eskom</strong> needs to prove that it is financially<br />
viable and able to meet its debt commitments – something it can only achieve by moving<br />
towards cost-reflective prices. Since 2008, <strong>Eskom</strong> has been transitioning towards cost-<br />
reflective prices with the ultimate goal of achieving a standalone investment-grade credit<br />
rating. The MYPD 3 application continues along this path.<br />
1.2.2 Ensuring security of supply<br />
South Africa‟s electricity supply is currently constrained, with available power matched<br />
closely by demand. Even though <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s capacity expansion programme has already<br />
added considerable generating capacity to the national grid, the situation will remain tight for<br />
at least part of the MYPD 3 period. <strong>Eskom</strong> has stepped up its maintenance programme to<br />
ensure that existing power plants maintain optimal output. It has also implemented a range<br />
of integrated demand management (IDM) measures to motivate customers to limit demand<br />
by adopting energy-saving technologies and behaviours. In the long term, ensuring security<br />
of supply involves building the generating capacity outlined in IRP 2010.<br />
1.2.3 A more equitable alternative to taxes<br />
As long as tariffs are below cost-reflective levels, consumers of electricity are, in effect,<br />
being subsidised by the government – and, ultimately the taxpayer. It also means that the<br />
major beneficiaries of that subsidy are those who use the most electricity. The implicit<br />
subsidy provided by electricity that is not cost reflective therefore not only distorts the<br />
efficiency of the market but also means that wealth is effectively being transferred to large<br />
consumers of electricity, which is neither equitable nor desirable.<br />
1.3 What effect will the price increases have?<br />
The MYPD 3 revenue application aims to find an electricity price path that contributes to<br />
long-term economic growth and job creation while minimising the short-term effects on<br />
vulnerable sectors and offering protection to low-income households. The period over which<br />
this transition occurs is key. Gradually phasing in cost reflectivity may give the country time