24.08.2013 Views

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />

2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />

Page 16 of 144<br />

industry, one with the resources to operate and maintain current infrastructure while building<br />

the generating capacity necessitated by demand.<br />

Infrastructure expansion is a costly exercise that requires financing from domestic and<br />

international sources. To secure this funding, <strong>Eskom</strong> needs to prove that it is financially<br />

viable and able to meet its debt commitments – something it can only achieve by moving<br />

towards cost-reflective prices. Since 2008, <strong>Eskom</strong> has been transitioning towards cost-<br />

reflective prices with the ultimate goal of achieving a standalone investment-grade credit<br />

rating. The MYPD 3 application continues along this path.<br />

1.2.2 Ensuring security of supply<br />

South Africa‟s electricity supply is currently constrained, with available power matched<br />

closely by demand. Even though <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s capacity expansion programme has already<br />

added considerable generating capacity to the national grid, the situation will remain tight for<br />

at least part of the MYPD 3 period. <strong>Eskom</strong> has stepped up its maintenance programme to<br />

ensure that existing power plants maintain optimal output. It has also implemented a range<br />

of integrated demand management (IDM) measures to motivate customers to limit demand<br />

by adopting energy-saving technologies and behaviours. In the long term, ensuring security<br />

of supply involves building the generating capacity outlined in IRP 2010.<br />

1.2.3 A more equitable alternative to taxes<br />

As long as tariffs are below cost-reflective levels, consumers of electricity are, in effect,<br />

being subsidised by the government – and, ultimately the taxpayer. It also means that the<br />

major beneficiaries of that subsidy are those who use the most electricity. The implicit<br />

subsidy provided by electricity that is not cost reflective therefore not only distorts the<br />

efficiency of the market but also means that wealth is effectively being transferred to large<br />

consumers of electricity, which is neither equitable nor desirable.<br />

1.3 What effect will the price increases have?<br />

The MYPD 3 revenue application aims to find an electricity price path that contributes to<br />

long-term economic growth and job creation while minimising the short-term effects on<br />

vulnerable sectors and offering protection to low-income households. The period over which<br />

this transition occurs is key. Gradually phasing in cost reflectivity may give the country time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!