Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />
2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />
Page 114 of 144<br />
the five years of the MYPD 3 period, followed by average price increases of 9% for a further<br />
five years thereafter (MYPD 4), and thereafter annual increases of 5%. The projected price<br />
path for electricity is 102 c/kWh compared to the IRP 2010 price path that reaches 110<br />
c/kWh in real terms in 2030/31.<br />
Further findings were as follows:<br />
<strong>Eskom</strong> would have to raise approximately R1.1 trillion in debt between 2013/14 and<br />
2030, with a maximum level of debt per year of R60 billion in 12/13 real terms.<br />
IPPs would incur a projected total cost of close to R750 billion from 2013/14 to 2030.<br />
The costs incurred during MYPD 3 would total about R140 billion. Of this, about 80%<br />
would go to the renewable energy IPP programme. IPP costs are offset against<br />
deductions in <strong>Eskom</strong>‟s primary energy cost.<br />
Table 49 indicates the impact of 9,200MW of the renewable energy IPP programme in<br />
MYPD 3.<br />
Table 49: Financial impact to 2030 for the 65% <strong>Eskom</strong> build scenario<br />
R' million<br />
<strong>Eskom</strong> Primary energy<br />
IPP's<br />
Operating costs<br />
Capex<br />
Debt required<br />
Interest costs<br />
<strong>Revenue</strong><br />
Sales (TWh) 1,142<br />
MYPD3 2014~2018 MYPD4 2019~2023 MYPD5 2024~2028 2029~2031 Total IRP 2030<br />
309,439<br />
139,532<br />
309,536<br />
495,362<br />
333,771<br />
156,454<br />
1,206,697<br />
429,448<br />
204,826<br />
526,248<br />
1,035,816<br />
427,302<br />
197,303<br />
2,358,214<br />
Some key financial and technical results are presented in a combined figure to understand<br />
the trade-offs between certain parameters. For example: a reduction in the debt to EBITDA<br />
1,265<br />
ratio will result in an increase in the leverage ratio.<br />
675,609<br />
222,395<br />
757,414<br />
1,376,142<br />
271,521<br />
340,438<br />
3,269,978<br />
1,506<br />
516,482<br />
172,137<br />
549,659<br />
433,469<br />
36,000<br />
105,051<br />
2,546,062<br />
995<br />
1,930,977<br />
738,890<br />
2,142,857<br />
3,340,789<br />
1,068,593<br />
799,246<br />
9,380,952<br />
4,908