24.08.2013 Views

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

Part 1 Revenue Application: Multi-Year Price Determination ... - Eskom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview of <strong>Multi</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determination</strong><br />

2013/14–2017/18 (MYPD 3)<br />

Figure 11: Thirty-year horizon of <strong>Eskom</strong>’s existing generation capacity (GW)<br />

Page 108 of 144<br />

According to IRP 2010, South Africa needs to build about 45,000MW of extra generating<br />

capacity by 2030 in order to meet the country‟s needs. This will cost about R1,8 trillion for<br />

new generating capacity, R1,3 trillion to expand and maintain the network capacity and a<br />

further R500 billion to cater for maintaining the existing power station fleet. Together, this will<br />

require a combined capital cost of R3.5 trillion in total between 2013 to 2030. The pricing<br />

implications of building this extra capacity needs to be considered and a decision made as to<br />

how this issue should be addressed at this stage. If it is not addressed now, <strong>Eskom</strong> may<br />

have to apply for a reopener of the MYPD 3 decision once the policy decisions have been<br />

made.<br />

Given that expansion projects can take decades to plan, finance and execute, <strong>Eskom</strong> should<br />

start planning towards, and sourcing funding for, IRP 2010 capacity expansion during the<br />

MYPD 3 period. There has been engagement regarding the DoE‟s policy requirements and<br />

government is in the process of providing clarity in this regard. However, the government still<br />

needs to undertake feasibility studies regarding its projected generation requirement and<br />

how it should be allocated, so the allocation decision has not yet been made.<br />

It would be irresponsible of <strong>Eskom</strong> not to reflect the implications of the additional capacity<br />

requirements on the price path. Therefore, for illustrative purposes, <strong>Eskom</strong> has provided the<br />

implications of two scenarios that assumes that it will ultimately be responsible for 65%<br />

(scenario one) or 100% (scenario two) of the capacity requirements projected in IRP 2010.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!