24.08.2013 Views

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMPAG Posters<br />

this group <strong>of</strong> men with decision support, and we anticipate that men<br />

will report better understanding <strong>of</strong> different risk management strategies<br />

and increased consumer satisfaction and will be more involved<br />

in decision-making .<br />

EP12. Family dynamics and genetic<br />

conditions<br />

EP12.1<br />

Perceived impact <strong>of</strong> BRCA1/2 testing on familial relationships<br />

and association with psychological distress<br />

M. Dorval, K. Bouchard, E. Maunsell, S. Camden, J. Simard;<br />

Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.<br />

Objectives: This study describes the perceived impact <strong>of</strong> BRCA1/2<br />

testing on relationships with first degree relatives. It also assesses<br />

whether experiencing a negative impact on relationships is associated<br />

with psychological distress and whether a positive impact is protective<br />

against distress .<br />

Methods: A total <strong>of</strong> 636 French-Canadian women from 236 families,<br />

who underwent BRCA1/2 testing in the context <strong>of</strong> the INHERIT BRCAs<br />

program between August 1998 and July 2004, were enrolled . Among<br />

them, 44% had already had cancer; 131 women were found to be mutation<br />

carriers, 172 non-carriers, and 333 had an inconclusive result .<br />

Questionnaires completed at pre-test and then at 1, 12, and 36 months<br />

post-disclosure were used to assess the perceived impact <strong>of</strong> testing on<br />

family relationships and psychological distress .<br />

Results: Three years post-disclosure, 11% <strong>of</strong> women perceived that<br />

testing has a positive impact on their familial relationship compared to<br />

only 3% who perceived that the impact was negative . Among mutation<br />

carriers, these proportions reach 16% and 7%, respectively . After controlling<br />

for a range <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic, medical, and psychosocial<br />

factors, experiencing a negative impact on relationships with a firstdegree<br />

relative was significantly associated with long-term distress<br />

(p=0 .04) . However, the perception that genetic testing had a positive<br />

impact on relationships was not protective against distress .<br />

Conclusions: Although the perception that genetic testing had a negative<br />

impact on family relationships is associated with long-term distress,<br />

this is quite infrequent . More research is needed to better understand<br />

how the impact <strong>of</strong> BRCA1/2 testing on family dynamics may<br />

affect individuals’ quality <strong>of</strong> life .<br />

EP12.2<br />

social intervention in the context <strong>of</strong> presymptomatic testing for<br />

late-onset neurological disorders<br />

N. Oliveira, J. Pinto-Basto, J. Sequeiros;<br />

IBMC, Porto, Portugal.<br />

These diseases have several social and psychological implications<br />

(structural, processing, cognitive, emotional changes) . Social intervention<br />

should be based in the systemic concept: good balance between<br />

psychodynamics demands <strong>of</strong> illness and family dynamics and their<br />

resources is determinant for the adaptation process and confrontation<br />

with the illness .<br />

In our protocol <strong>of</strong> presymptomatic testing, the social worker assesses<br />

two groups <strong>of</strong> risk factors: (1) vulnerability centred on the subject (the<br />

genetic risk, personality resources, cognitive resources, etc .); and (2)<br />

vulnerability connected with inadequacy <strong>of</strong> the environment (familial<br />

structure, separation or death <strong>of</strong> a parent, chronic disease, economical<br />

fragility/poverty, social isolation, etc .) .<br />

Social Intervention is carried out through (1) exchanges holding emotional<br />

positive attitudes; (2) (formal or informal) counselling, allowing<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> interactions that have the aim <strong>of</strong> sharing information<br />

on the disease; (3) material or instrumental support; (4) technical<br />

support or <strong>of</strong> services; and (5) access to new contacts . In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

social intervention, several people have also been helped with waivers<br />

for fees in health care (exemption from fees, medication, technical<br />

aids) (23); in the process <strong>of</strong> their incapacity retirement (10), pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

conversion or changes (5), in the process for fiscal (IRS) benefits<br />

(3), and help finding a nursing home, continued care unit or care<br />

at home (6) .<br />

Social intervention, in presymptomatic testing for late-onset, so far incurable,<br />

neurological diseases, has the aim to help the persons at-risk<br />

and their family to keep balance and functioning, when confronted with<br />

crises, such as test results or beginning <strong>of</strong> symptoms .<br />

EP12.3<br />

susceptibility to type 2 diabetes: perceptions and family<br />

communication regarding inheritance and primary prevention<br />

S. C. M. van Esch 1,2 , F. J. Snoek 1,2 , M. C. Cornel 3,2 ;<br />

1 VU University medical center, dept. <strong>of</strong> Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands, 2 VU University medical center, EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands, 3 VU University medical center, dept. <strong>of</strong> Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Amsterdam,<br />

The Netherlands.<br />

Type 2 diabetes is a multi factorial disease, which means diabetes<br />

onset is triggered by interaction <strong>of</strong> (multiple) genes and environmental<br />

factors . Family history may serve as a good predictor <strong>of</strong> diabetes<br />

risk . People at risk can delay or possibly prevent diabetes by following<br />

a healthy lifestyle . We wonder whether this information is known by<br />

patients and whether they (are able or willing to) share it with their<br />

relatives .<br />

544 People diagnosed with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire.<br />

It appears in most families talking about diabetes is not taboo . Most<br />

respondents indicate that ‘sometimes’ diabetes is discussed; mostly<br />

initiated by the patients themselves . Subjects include mainly diabetes<br />

related problems; less developing or preventing diabetes onset .<br />

Approximately half <strong>of</strong> the respondents knew about the inheritable character<br />

<strong>of</strong> diabetes; half <strong>of</strong> the group prefers more information provided<br />

by pr<strong>of</strong>essionals . A majority agrees on the potential role <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

informing their family; half <strong>of</strong> the group actually intends to do so . They<br />

indicated they knew what, how, and whom to tell . Approximately half <strong>of</strong><br />

the respondents believes patients should be coached by health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

. In the presentation, relations between demographic variables<br />

(including ethnicity), diabetes related factors (including illness perceptions<br />

and family history), knowledge on inheritance and primary prevention,<br />

and family communication will be outlined .<br />

In our opinion, the results may contribute to more targeted and effective<br />

health promotion strategies in diabetes prevention programs .<br />

However, we experienced quite different reactions, mostly in non-responders,<br />

discussing health issues in relation to family matters .<br />

EP13. Living with genetic disease<br />

EP13.1<br />

The long-term information and support needs <strong>of</strong> BRCA1/2<br />

mutation carriers<br />

V. L. Hunt1 , R. Iredale2 ;<br />

1 2 Peninsula Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong> Service, Exeter, United Kingdom, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Cardiff, United Kingdom.<br />

Genetic testing for inherited breast/ovarian cancer can have far reaching<br />

implications, both for the individual and their family . Research to<br />

date has mainly focused on the short-term impact <strong>of</strong> testing . The aims<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study were to explore the long-term impact <strong>of</strong> being identified<br />

as a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier, investigate the information and support<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> this group and explore best how cancer genetics services can<br />

meet these needs .<br />

Data was gathered using semi-structured interviews with women who<br />

had undergone genetic testing in Wales and had received a mutation<br />

positive result . The interview transcripts were thematically analysed to<br />

gain insight into participant’s thoughts and experiences .<br />

For these women their ‘genetic journey’ did not end upon receipt <strong>of</strong><br />

their test results. The findings suggest that BRCA mutation carriers<br />

may have specific needs for information and support that extend beyond<br />

the genetic testing process and that these needs may vary over<br />

time. A number <strong>of</strong> real or perceived barriers were identified which prevented<br />

participants from accessing support and information . Participants<br />

made valuable suggestions as to how cancer genetics services<br />

could address these issues .<br />

It is likely that no single intervention will be effective in addressing<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> this heterogeneous group . Further large scale research<br />

is needed to investigate how best to target resources to meet client<br />

needs . This study explores the views <strong>of</strong> this group, highlighting issues<br />

that are important to them. The findings emphasise the fact that longterm<br />

user involvement is essential in the planning and optimising <strong>of</strong><br />

service provision .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!