24.08.2013 Views

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMPAG Posters<br />

A group <strong>of</strong> 15 individuals who identify themselves as Arabic-Australian<br />

were recruited through two Sydney familial cancer services . Ethnographic<br />

interviews explored themes such as beliefs about inherited illnesses<br />

including inherited susceptibility to cancer, cultural beliefs and<br />

practices when communicating within families about inherited cancers<br />

and the impact, if any, <strong>of</strong> attending a cancer genetics service on these<br />

beliefs and practices . Thematic analysis <strong>of</strong> interview summaries identified<br />

common outcomes, informing the development <strong>of</strong> an explanatory<br />

model for inherited susceptibility to cancer in this sample .<br />

The cultural backgrounds <strong>of</strong> the 7 males and 8 females interviewed<br />

were Egyptian, Iraqi, Lebanese and Turkish, and ages ranged from<br />

29 to 82 years (median age 54) . Participants generally were highly acculturated<br />

as measured by their English language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and had<br />

a good understanding <strong>of</strong> the genetic basis <strong>of</strong> the cancer in their family<br />

. There was little or no discrepency between the individuals’ beliefs<br />

about inherited cancer and the model <strong>of</strong> clinical practice utilised in the<br />

clinics attended .<br />

People <strong>of</strong> an Arabic-Australian background are one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing<br />

ethnic groups in Australia . It is therefore important to document<br />

their beliefs to ensure they are compatible with the current models <strong>of</strong><br />

practice in cancer genetics clinics .<br />

A better understanding and awareness <strong>of</strong> cultural beliefs and potential<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> disparity will guide optimal cancer genetics service provision .<br />

More research is needed to confirm reported beliefs <strong>of</strong> non-attending<br />

family members .<br />

EP06.2<br />

the public understanding <strong>of</strong> newborn screening<br />

B. Wieser;<br />

IFZ, Graz, Austria.<br />

Neonatal screening for genetic disorders is a routine practice for many<br />

decades . In particular, screening for PKU has become a standard procedure<br />

. However, internationally the way by which neonatal screening<br />

is carried out varies notably . Especially for disorders where treatment<br />

options are not as straightforward as they are for PKU, screening may<br />

be <strong>of</strong>fered, but only on voluntary basis . Austria has decided to expand<br />

its programme significantly in 2002. The introduction <strong>of</strong> tandem-massspectrometry<br />

plays a crucial role in this regard . With this technology<br />

it became possible to screen for 30 inherited disorders . All together<br />

the Austrian neonatal screening programme comprises as many as<br />

23 conditions .<br />

In this paper I will especially address the issue <strong>of</strong> the public understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> newborn screening . I will do so by drawing on the Wilson<br />

and Jungner guidelines as developed for the WHO. Specifically I will<br />

address the 6 th principle: “The test should be acceptable to the population”<br />

(cf . Dhondt 2007) . Taking this requirement seriously this raises<br />

important issues <strong>of</strong> lay understanding <strong>of</strong> genetic disorders and the way<br />

in which an expansion <strong>of</strong> newborn screening can be perceived . The<br />

issue will be contextualised into the historical context in which the Austrian<br />

newborn screening programme has been initiated . I will also contrast<br />

the Austrian case from other <strong>European</strong> countries in order to point<br />

out differences <strong>of</strong> the way in which a public understanding <strong>of</strong> newborn<br />

screening can be facilitated .<br />

EP06.3<br />

Why do intenders not behave: exploring the gap between the<br />

intention to take part in preconceptional carrierscreening for<br />

cystic fibrosis and/or haemoglobinopathies and not doing so<br />

A. C. Plass1,2 , P. Lakeman1 , J. Wenink1,2 , M. C. Cornel1,2 ;<br />

1 2 VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EMGO-institute,<br />

Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore why couples who intended to participate<br />

in a preconceptional carrierscreening for cystic fibrosis and/or<br />

haemoglobinopathies (N=142), did not take part in the test after all<br />

(N=66), particularly beyond reasons like <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> time .<br />

All 66 couples were called up and asked whether they were willing to<br />

answer a few questions directly or some time later at their home about<br />

their non-participation in the test . All phone calls and face-to-face interviews<br />

were recorded and analyzed using the IPA-method .<br />

41 couples were contactable . 13 couples no longer belonged to the<br />

research target group <strong>of</strong> couples that were planning a pregnancy in<br />

the future, and were excluded . 20 couples agreed to a telephone-interview<br />

and 5 others were interviewed at their home . The reason most<br />

frequently mentioned for not taking part in the test after all was ‘lack <strong>of</strong><br />

time’. But, in asking about social influence it appeared that sometimes<br />

parents, other family members, friends or GPs had expressed their<br />

doubts about the couple’s intention to take part in such a test .<br />

Even though lack <strong>of</strong> time was the most frequently mentioned reason<br />

for not taking part in a preconception carrier-screening test after clearly<br />

having expressed the intention to do so, the negative input <strong>of</strong> the social<br />

environment might have played a major role in not carrying out one’s<br />

intentions . Most couples were surprised by the negative reactions <strong>of</strong><br />

their social environment and reevaluated test participation as being<br />

less important .<br />

EP06.4<br />

Attitudes towards thalassaemia carrier testing in saudi arabis<br />

H. Y. Alabdulwahed;<br />

Dhahran Health Center, Saudi Aramco, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.<br />

Thalassaemia is a life limiting condition, characterised by severe anaemia<br />

which requires frequent blood transfusions . It is a global health<br />

problem, and is prevalent in countries with a history <strong>of</strong> malaria outbreak<br />

. Thalassaemia is a recessively inherited condition, i .e . both parents<br />

have to carry the thalassaemia gene in order to have affected<br />

children . Carriers do not show any symptoms <strong>of</strong> thalassaemia, and<br />

a blood test is necessary to identify carrier status . There are many<br />

mass public screening programmes throughout the world which aim<br />

to control and prevent this condition . In 2004, Saudi Arabia started a<br />

compulsory premarital screening programme to identify thalassaemia<br />

carriers, along with carriers <strong>of</strong> another haemoglobinopathy (sickle cell<br />

anaemia) . To date no attempt has been made to investigate the Saudi<br />

people’s thoughts and feelings towards the screening . This qualitative<br />

study used a semi-structured interview guide and was designed to<br />

explore the attitude <strong>of</strong> Saudis who have undergone mandatory screening<br />

for thalassaemia . Sixteen individuals participated in the study . The<br />

primary findings were that: participants accepted and supported the<br />

premarital screening programme; their motivations to undergo testing<br />

included: having healthy children, reducing the incidence <strong>of</strong> hereditary<br />

diseases in the country, and removing any risk in entering an arranged<br />

(usually consanguineous) marriage; the majority <strong>of</strong> participants lacked<br />

knowledge about screening; and many misconceptions and negative<br />

feelings towards screening emerged . The main conclusion is that there<br />

is a pressing need to increase public awareness about screening advantages<br />

and, more importantly, to educate individuals undergoing<br />

carrier testing .<br />

EP07. Disclosure <strong>of</strong> test results<br />

(pr<strong>of</strong>essionals/patients/families/third<br />

parties)<br />

EP07.1<br />

communicating genetics research results to families: problems<br />

arising when the patient participant is deceased<br />

L. Ormondroyd 1 , C. Moynihan 1 , A. Ardern-Jones 2 , R. Eeles 3 , C. Foster 4 , S.<br />

Davolls 1 , M. Watson 1 ;<br />

1 Psychology Research Group, Institute <strong>of</strong> Cancer Research, Sutton, United<br />

Kingdom, 2 Cancer <strong>Genetics</strong> Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London/Sutton,<br />

United Kingdom, 3 Translational Cancer <strong>Genetics</strong> Team and Cancer<br />

<strong>Genetics</strong> Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London/Sutton, United<br />

Kingdom, 4 Macmillan Research Unit, School <strong>of</strong> Nursing and Midwifery, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sounthampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.<br />

Purpose: This study explores communication within families <strong>of</strong> clinically<br />

significant genetics research results, after the death <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />

participant . BRCA2 mutations were found in several men after their<br />

death from prostate cancer . Spouses were given the results in a genetic<br />

counselling session and asked to inform relatives .<br />

Method: Cross sectional, qualitative exploratory study . Interviews with<br />

13 relatives, including informers and recipients <strong>of</strong> the information, were<br />

analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis .<br />

Results: Dissemination was hampered when communication channels<br />

between relatives were limited, because <strong>of</strong> family rifts or socially distant<br />

or problematic relationships . When informing other branches <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!