2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EMPAG Posters<br />
A group <strong>of</strong> 15 individuals who identify themselves as Arabic-Australian<br />
were recruited through two Sydney familial cancer services . Ethnographic<br />
interviews explored themes such as beliefs about inherited illnesses<br />
including inherited susceptibility to cancer, cultural beliefs and<br />
practices when communicating within families about inherited cancers<br />
and the impact, if any, <strong>of</strong> attending a cancer genetics service on these<br />
beliefs and practices . Thematic analysis <strong>of</strong> interview summaries identified<br />
common outcomes, informing the development <strong>of</strong> an explanatory<br />
model for inherited susceptibility to cancer in this sample .<br />
The cultural backgrounds <strong>of</strong> the 7 males and 8 females interviewed<br />
were Egyptian, Iraqi, Lebanese and Turkish, and ages ranged from<br />
29 to 82 years (median age 54) . Participants generally were highly acculturated<br />
as measured by their English language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and had<br />
a good understanding <strong>of</strong> the genetic basis <strong>of</strong> the cancer in their family<br />
. There was little or no discrepency between the individuals’ beliefs<br />
about inherited cancer and the model <strong>of</strong> clinical practice utilised in the<br />
clinics attended .<br />
People <strong>of</strong> an Arabic-Australian background are one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing<br />
ethnic groups in Australia . It is therefore important to document<br />
their beliefs to ensure they are compatible with the current models <strong>of</strong><br />
practice in cancer genetics clinics .<br />
A better understanding and awareness <strong>of</strong> cultural beliefs and potential<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> disparity will guide optimal cancer genetics service provision .<br />
More research is needed to confirm reported beliefs <strong>of</strong> non-attending<br />
family members .<br />
EP06.2<br />
the public understanding <strong>of</strong> newborn screening<br />
B. Wieser;<br />
IFZ, Graz, Austria.<br />
Neonatal screening for genetic disorders is a routine practice for many<br />
decades . In particular, screening for PKU has become a standard procedure<br />
. However, internationally the way by which neonatal screening<br />
is carried out varies notably . Especially for disorders where treatment<br />
options are not as straightforward as they are for PKU, screening may<br />
be <strong>of</strong>fered, but only on voluntary basis . Austria has decided to expand<br />
its programme significantly in 2002. The introduction <strong>of</strong> tandem-massspectrometry<br />
plays a crucial role in this regard . With this technology<br />
it became possible to screen for 30 inherited disorders . All together<br />
the Austrian neonatal screening programme comprises as many as<br />
23 conditions .<br />
In this paper I will especially address the issue <strong>of</strong> the public understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> newborn screening . I will do so by drawing on the Wilson<br />
and Jungner guidelines as developed for the WHO. Specifically I will<br />
address the 6 th principle: “The test should be acceptable to the population”<br />
(cf . Dhondt 2007) . Taking this requirement seriously this raises<br />
important issues <strong>of</strong> lay understanding <strong>of</strong> genetic disorders and the way<br />
in which an expansion <strong>of</strong> newborn screening can be perceived . The<br />
issue will be contextualised into the historical context in which the Austrian<br />
newborn screening programme has been initiated . I will also contrast<br />
the Austrian case from other <strong>European</strong> countries in order to point<br />
out differences <strong>of</strong> the way in which a public understanding <strong>of</strong> newborn<br />
screening can be facilitated .<br />
EP06.3<br />
Why do intenders not behave: exploring the gap between the<br />
intention to take part in preconceptional carrierscreening for<br />
cystic fibrosis and/or haemoglobinopathies and not doing so<br />
A. C. Plass1,2 , P. Lakeman1 , J. Wenink1,2 , M. C. Cornel1,2 ;<br />
1 2 VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EMGO-institute,<br />
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore why couples who intended to participate<br />
in a preconceptional carrierscreening for cystic fibrosis and/or<br />
haemoglobinopathies (N=142), did not take part in the test after all<br />
(N=66), particularly beyond reasons like <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> time .<br />
All 66 couples were called up and asked whether they were willing to<br />
answer a few questions directly or some time later at their home about<br />
their non-participation in the test . All phone calls and face-to-face interviews<br />
were recorded and analyzed using the IPA-method .<br />
41 couples were contactable . 13 couples no longer belonged to the<br />
research target group <strong>of</strong> couples that were planning a pregnancy in<br />
the future, and were excluded . 20 couples agreed to a telephone-interview<br />
and 5 others were interviewed at their home . The reason most<br />
frequently mentioned for not taking part in the test after all was ‘lack <strong>of</strong><br />
time’. But, in asking about social influence it appeared that sometimes<br />
parents, other family members, friends or GPs had expressed their<br />
doubts about the couple’s intention to take part in such a test .<br />
Even though lack <strong>of</strong> time was the most frequently mentioned reason<br />
for not taking part in a preconception carrier-screening test after clearly<br />
having expressed the intention to do so, the negative input <strong>of</strong> the social<br />
environment might have played a major role in not carrying out one’s<br />
intentions . Most couples were surprised by the negative reactions <strong>of</strong><br />
their social environment and reevaluated test participation as being<br />
less important .<br />
EP06.4<br />
Attitudes towards thalassaemia carrier testing in saudi arabis<br />
H. Y. Alabdulwahed;<br />
Dhahran Health Center, Saudi Aramco, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.<br />
Thalassaemia is a life limiting condition, characterised by severe anaemia<br />
which requires frequent blood transfusions . It is a global health<br />
problem, and is prevalent in countries with a history <strong>of</strong> malaria outbreak<br />
. Thalassaemia is a recessively inherited condition, i .e . both parents<br />
have to carry the thalassaemia gene in order to have affected<br />
children . Carriers do not show any symptoms <strong>of</strong> thalassaemia, and<br />
a blood test is necessary to identify carrier status . There are many<br />
mass public screening programmes throughout the world which aim<br />
to control and prevent this condition . In 2004, Saudi Arabia started a<br />
compulsory premarital screening programme to identify thalassaemia<br />
carriers, along with carriers <strong>of</strong> another haemoglobinopathy (sickle cell<br />
anaemia) . To date no attempt has been made to investigate the Saudi<br />
people’s thoughts and feelings towards the screening . This qualitative<br />
study used a semi-structured interview guide and was designed to<br />
explore the attitude <strong>of</strong> Saudis who have undergone mandatory screening<br />
for thalassaemia . Sixteen individuals participated in the study . The<br />
primary findings were that: participants accepted and supported the<br />
premarital screening programme; their motivations to undergo testing<br />
included: having healthy children, reducing the incidence <strong>of</strong> hereditary<br />
diseases in the country, and removing any risk in entering an arranged<br />
(usually consanguineous) marriage; the majority <strong>of</strong> participants lacked<br />
knowledge about screening; and many misconceptions and negative<br />
feelings towards screening emerged . The main conclusion is that there<br />
is a pressing need to increase public awareness about screening advantages<br />
and, more importantly, to educate individuals undergoing<br />
carrier testing .<br />
EP07. Disclosure <strong>of</strong> test results<br />
(pr<strong>of</strong>essionals/patients/families/third<br />
parties)<br />
EP07.1<br />
communicating genetics research results to families: problems<br />
arising when the patient participant is deceased<br />
L. Ormondroyd 1 , C. Moynihan 1 , A. Ardern-Jones 2 , R. Eeles 3 , C. Foster 4 , S.<br />
Davolls 1 , M. Watson 1 ;<br />
1 Psychology Research Group, Institute <strong>of</strong> Cancer Research, Sutton, United<br />
Kingdom, 2 Cancer <strong>Genetics</strong> Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London/Sutton,<br />
United Kingdom, 3 Translational Cancer <strong>Genetics</strong> Team and Cancer<br />
<strong>Genetics</strong> Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London/Sutton, United<br />
Kingdom, 4 Macmillan Research Unit, School <strong>of</strong> Nursing and Midwifery, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sounthampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.<br />
Purpose: This study explores communication within families <strong>of</strong> clinically<br />
significant genetics research results, after the death <strong>of</strong> the patient<br />
participant . BRCA2 mutations were found in several men after their<br />
death from prostate cancer . Spouses were given the results in a genetic<br />
counselling session and asked to inform relatives .<br />
Method: Cross sectional, qualitative exploratory study . Interviews with<br />
13 relatives, including informers and recipients <strong>of</strong> the information, were<br />
analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis .<br />
Results: Dissemination was hampered when communication channels<br />
between relatives were limited, because <strong>of</strong> family rifts or socially distant<br />
or problematic relationships . When informing other branches <strong>of</strong>