24.08.2013 Views

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Genetic counselling, education, genetic services, and public policy<br />

community, has established the Genetic Testing Reference Materials<br />

Coordination Program (GeT-RM) to improve public availability <strong>of</strong> reference<br />

materials and facilitate information exchange and communication<br />

on reference materials development, contribution, characterization,<br />

distribution, and needs assessment . RESULTS: The GeT-RM has<br />

characterized reference materials for Huntington disease, Fragile X,<br />

cystic fibrosis, Bloom syndrome, familial dysautonomia, Canavan disease,<br />

Niemann-Pick disease, Tay-Sachs disease, Gaucher disease,<br />

glycogen storage disease type 1a, Fanconi anemia, and mucolipidosis<br />

type IV . The GeT-RM program also collects information from other<br />

sources about publicly available cell lines/DNA with clinically important<br />

mutations that may be useful as reference materials . This information<br />

is posted on the program website . To date, the GeT-RM has focused its<br />

efforts on DNA based testing for inherited genetic disorders . However,<br />

we hope to expand our efforts into other areas <strong>of</strong> genetics, including<br />

molecular oncology and biochemical genetic testing . CONCLUSIONS:<br />

The increased availability <strong>of</strong> characterized reference materials for quality<br />

assurance, pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing, test development and research, will<br />

help to improve the quality and accuracy <strong>of</strong> genetic testing . GeT-RM<br />

website: http://wwwn .cdc .gov/dls/genetics/rmmaterials/default .aspx<br />

P09.63<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> AZFc region microdeletion in repeated pregnancy<br />

loss<br />

S. M. Kalantar1 , M. H. Sheikhha1 , H. Fazli1 , M. Solimani1 , F. Pakravesh2 ;<br />

1 2 Research & Clinical Centre for Infertility, Yazd, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran, Aban<br />

Hospital, Tehran, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran.<br />

Objective: To evaluate the role <strong>of</strong> Y chromosome microdeletion in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> couples had problem with repeated pregnancy loss (RPL) ingroup<br />

<strong>of</strong> unknown cause compared with couples with male factor infertility<br />

.<br />

Materials & Methods: A controlled clinical study was desgined in our<br />

centre . In total, 100 men from male factor infertility and 25 men with<br />

RPL were recruited in the study .<br />

DNA was extracted from Peripheral blood sample . In each sample,<br />

six sequence-tagged-sites (STS) according to the europian protocol<br />

and four other STSs in the proximal AZFc region namely; DYS262,<br />

DYS220, DYF8551, and DYF8651 were studied by polymerase chain<br />

reaction (PCR) .<br />

Results: Eight men tested evaluated had Y microdelation in at least<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the six segments from Europian protocol (8%) VS non in RPL<br />

group . Five men with history <strong>of</strong> at least 3 PL in their wife tested for 4<br />

STS in AZFc region had microdelation (20%) but non <strong>of</strong> those other<br />

STS . In the inferile group had not any microdeletion related to the 4<br />

STS from AZFc region .<br />

Conclusion: From our results it could concluded that in case <strong>of</strong> couples<br />

with un explained PRL it may help to test these four STSs on Y chromosome<br />

to recognize the cause <strong>of</strong> PL .<br />

P09.64<br />

mutational homogeneity <strong>of</strong> severe autosomal recessive retinal<br />

degeneration in endogamous Romany (Gypsy) communities in<br />

slovakia<br />

A. Ficek 1,2 , E. Feráková 1 , L. Kádaši 1,2 , G. Minárik 1 , H. Poláková 2 , V. Ferák 1 ;<br />

1 Comenius University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Natural Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2 Slovak<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Molecular Physiology and <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />

Bratislava, Slovakia.<br />

Hereditary retinal degenerations comprise clinically and genetically<br />

wide group <strong>of</strong> mostly progressive ocular disorders and are one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most frequent causes <strong>of</strong> vision impairment in developed countries . So<br />

far uncovered tremendous genetic heterogeneity underlying majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> these disorders however markedly impedes ongoing attempts<br />

on DNA diagnostics and therapy in most <strong>of</strong> populations . Contrary to<br />

panmictic populations, genetic heterogeneity in isolated populations<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten reduced to high degree due to founder effect and inbreeding .<br />

Severe childhood autosomal recessive rod-cone progressive retinal<br />

degeneration with feature <strong>of</strong> retinitis pigmentosa (nyctalopia, dark pigment<br />

formations, attenuated retinal vessels) and nystagmus characteristic<br />

for LCA phenotype occurs in higher frequency in to the high<br />

degree isolated Romany communities in Slovakia . Whole genome autozygosity<br />

mapping and linkage analysis accomplished on analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

two large pedigrees facilitated localization and identification <strong>of</strong> underlying<br />

mutation to which bidirectional allele specific amplification method<br />

was designed for routine mutation detection . Geographically delimited<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> the disease confirmed community structure <strong>of</strong> Romany<br />

population with existence <strong>of</strong> small, endogamic founder settlements .<br />

Growing <strong>of</strong> such small communities, characterized by high consanguinity<br />

rate, results in markedly increased incidence <strong>of</strong> this autosomal<br />

recessive disorder in some regions leading to significant genetic burden<br />

to the population . While no effective therapy exists for the disorder<br />

at the moment, cascade carrier screening and genetic counseling<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>fered to the families is currently the only possible approach to the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the disease .<br />

P09.65<br />

Governing the balance between ‘duty to protect’ and ‘right to<br />

test’ ii: New forms <strong>of</strong> protection in genetic screening<br />

M. C. Cornel, T. Pieters, C. G. van El;<br />

VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

While in the previous century the availability <strong>of</strong> genetic testing and<br />

screening was governed by public health authorities and medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals,<br />

increasingly direct-to-consumer tests become available .<br />

While on the one hand people have become more free to decide for<br />

themselves whether they want to order their genetic risk test, on the<br />

other hand, lack <strong>of</strong> counselling, personalized advice resembling general<br />

lifestyle advice or incorrect results may lead to disappointment or<br />

may prove harmful . Quality <strong>of</strong> genetic services is no longer guaranteed<br />

by existing regulations .<br />

In the United Kingdom the <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> Commission has updated<br />

its recommendations concerning direct-to-consumer testing, calling for<br />

stricter control, without precluding commercial testing, for instance by<br />

recommending that the test be <strong>of</strong>fered by a qualified health pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

.To guarantee informed decision making, the public needs to<br />

have access to high quality information (trusted websites) . Education<br />

and communication are needed to inform the public at large on pros<br />

and cons <strong>of</strong> genetic screening . Policy makers should engage with patient<br />

and consumer organisations . Especially for complex diseases<br />

translational research is needed . Possibilities to regulate marketing <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial test <strong>of</strong>fers after adequate pre-market evaluation need to<br />

be debated and implemented. The <strong>European</strong> certificate CE marking<br />

should guarantee analytical validity and clinical validity . Assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> clinical utility, relating to the availability <strong>of</strong> effective interventions,<br />

should be performed for new forms <strong>of</strong> testing and screening for lowrisk<br />

populations and high as well as low-risk gene variants .<br />

P09.66<br />

Governing the balance between ‘duty to protect’ and ‘right<br />

to test’ i: challenges to the focus on protection in genetic<br />

screening<br />

C. G. van El, T. Pieters, M. C. Cornel;<br />

VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

For genetic screening, criteria have been developed based on the<br />

WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria (1968), in which the notion <strong>of</strong> protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> citizens against unwarranted screening was important . In<br />

some countries, such as the Netherlands, ‘protection’ even became<br />

cornerstone <strong>of</strong> legislation concerning population screening . Protection<br />

relates to notions <strong>of</strong> having a suitable test with good sensitivity and few<br />

false positives, the availability <strong>of</strong> treatment and follow-up after diagnosis,<br />

so that benefits <strong>of</strong> screening outweigh potential harm, for instance<br />

<strong>of</strong> stress caused by uncertainty, the knowledge <strong>of</strong> having a fatal disorder<br />

or unnecessary interventions .<br />

In screening policy safeguards are needed because <strong>of</strong> the shared responsibilities<br />

<strong>of</strong> government and health care taking the initiative to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

screening to - in principle - healthy people .<br />

We argue that recent developments challenge this protective stance .<br />

Firstly, on the basis <strong>of</strong> developments in genomics, among other association<br />

studies, labs and companies increasingly <strong>of</strong>fer direct-to-consumer<br />

tests on the internet . Secondly, there is increasing awareness<br />

about and demand for testing and screening, sometimes stimulated<br />

by patient organisations . For instance, in the Netherlands, parents <strong>of</strong><br />

children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy argue that people might<br />

want a newborn screening test for DMD to be able to prepare or make<br />

reproductive decisions .<br />

The emphasis on protection ignores increasing demands for testing .<br />

Citizens want to be more autonomous . “Informed decision making” is<br />

not taken seriously when many genetic screening tests are simply not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!