24.08.2013 Views

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Genetic counselling, education, genetic services, and public policy<br />

testing is <strong>of</strong>fered free <strong>of</strong> charge to the relatives <strong>of</strong> babies diagnosed<br />

with CF through the newborn screening program . Although cascade<br />

testing is known to detect carriers <strong>of</strong> CF, its effectiveness has been<br />

questioned, in our clinical service and elsewhere, because most babies<br />

with CF are born to couples who do not have a family history;<br />

the uptake <strong>of</strong> cascade testing following a child’s diagnosis <strong>of</strong> CF by<br />

newborn screening has not been previously reported .<br />

We investigated CF cascade testing in the families <strong>of</strong> Victorian children<br />

with CF . We studied the uptake <strong>of</strong> cascade carrier testing by examining<br />

53 pedigrees <strong>of</strong> newborns diagnosed with CF between 2001 and<br />

2004, and performing data linkage to the laboratory database records .<br />

The uptake <strong>of</strong> carrier testing amongst adult first and second degree<br />

relatives was 16% (190/1160) . Parents were the most likely relatives to<br />

have been tested, followed by aunts/uncles, then grandparents .<br />

We conclude that cascade testing, as currently <strong>of</strong>fered, is not an effective<br />

strategy for detecting carriers for CF . An alternative is to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

population-based screening and this occurs in some countries but with<br />

quite variable uptake reported. Factors influencing uptake <strong>of</strong> CF carrier<br />

testing need to be explored . We are now conducting an evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

the barriers and facilitators to cascade testing to inform both clinical<br />

service delivery and population-based CF screening programs .<br />

P09.13<br />

Facing choices about genetic testing and assisted reproduction:<br />

developing an integrated care pathway to help health<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals meet the needs <strong>of</strong> infertile men with cystic<br />

Fibrosis (cF) and congenital bilateral absence <strong>of</strong> the vas<br />

deferens (cBAVD)<br />

A. Edwards 1 , C. Phelps 2 , A. Procter 1 , I. Ketchell 3 ;<br />

1 All Wales Medical <strong>Genetics</strong> Service; Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, University<br />

Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />

Cardiff University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 3 Adult Cystic<br />

Fibrosis Unit, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom.<br />

Background The choices <strong>of</strong>fered by assisted reproductive technologies<br />

(ART) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) mean that<br />

genetics services need to be better integrated into the care pathway<br />

<strong>of</strong> infertile men with CF/CBAVD . This study explored how multidisciplinary<br />

healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in one UK NHS Trust believe genetics<br />

services can be integrated into a common care pathway .<br />

Methods Three focus groups were convened with health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

involved in the care <strong>of</strong> men with CF/CBAVD (representing genetics,<br />

adult respiratory medicine, paediatrics, assisted reproduction and urology).<br />

The first two groups (5 & 7 participants respectively) explored<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> genetics, ART and PGD . Concerns and training needs<br />

were identified. Following patient interviews, a final focus group was<br />

convened to identify a common care pathway .<br />

Results . Much uncertainty existed amongst non-genetics specialisms<br />

regarding the role <strong>of</strong> genetics services in the CF/CBAVD care pathway.<br />

A lack <strong>of</strong> confidence was evident when talking about the genetics<br />

<strong>of</strong> CF/CBAVD, ART and PGD . Common concerns related to when to<br />

raise these issues and how to deal with parental pressure . Participants<br />

felt that although the in-depth discussion <strong>of</strong> these issues should be the<br />

main responsibility <strong>of</strong> the genetics service, their own basic knowledge<br />

could be enhanced .<br />

Conclusions . There is a need for improved information exchange about<br />

the genetics <strong>of</strong> CF/CBAVD and assisted reproductive options between<br />

specialisms . <strong>Genetics</strong> services can improve awareness and become<br />

better integrated into the existing care pathway by facilitating pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

workshops and training sessions, and producing leaflets and<br />

referral guidelines . An integrated care pathway is being developed .<br />

P09.14<br />

challenges in establishing a population carrier screening<br />

program for cystic fibrosis<br />

A. Bankier 1 , M. Delatycki 2 , J. Massie 3 , R. Forbes 2 , B. Chong 1 , D. DuSart 1 , V.<br />

Petrou 2 ;<br />

1 Victorian Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong> Services, Parkville, Australia, 2 Genetic Health<br />

Services Victoria, Parkville, Australia, 3 Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville,<br />

Australia.<br />

Cystic fibrosis is the commonest life shortening autosomal recessive<br />

condition among Caucasians due to mutations in the CFTR gene . The<br />

carrier frequency in this population is 4% with a disease incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

1:2,500 . Carriers are healthy and the majority <strong>of</strong> people are unaware<br />

<strong>of</strong> their carrier status . More than 95% <strong>of</strong> babies born with CF have no<br />

family history <strong>of</strong> CF . Most parents who have a child with CF elect to<br />

utilise reproductive technology for subsequent pregnancies by either<br />

prenatal diagnosis (PND) or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) .<br />

The US National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health and American College <strong>of</strong> Obstetricians<br />

and Gynecologists recommend <strong>of</strong>fering CF carrier testing to all<br />

couples .<br />

We have introduced a fee paying prenatal screening program, initially<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered through obstetricians in the private sector . Sampling is by<br />

cheek brush, testing for the twelve most common severe mutations in<br />

CFTR. In the first two years <strong>of</strong> the program 2975 people were screened<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom 64 were carriers (1:46) and 6 carrier couples (~1:500) were<br />

identified all <strong>of</strong> whom chose either PND if pregnant or PGD if non-pregnant<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> testing .<br />

The challenges and difficulties faced include difficulties <strong>of</strong> educating<br />

health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and the public about CF, the requirement for<br />

sample recollection in 2 .2% <strong>of</strong> patients screened, the correct collection<br />

procedure, patient anxiety regarding not being <strong>of</strong>fered screening until<br />

pregnant, reluctance <strong>of</strong> health pr<strong>of</strong>essional to <strong>of</strong>fer screening primarily<br />

due to time constraints and equity <strong>of</strong> care when screening is currently<br />

only <strong>of</strong>fered in the private health sector .<br />

P09.15<br />

EuroGentest medical <strong>Genetics</strong> Quality Assurance Database<br />

L. Desmet 1,2 , A. Corveleyn 1,2 , N. Nagels 1,2 , V. Lanneau 3 , I. Caron 3 , B. Urbero 3 ,<br />

S. Aymé 3,2 , E. Dequeker 1,2 , M. A. Morris 4,2 ;<br />

1 Department for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>, Leuven, Belgium, 2 EuroGentest, Leuven,<br />

Belgium, 3 Orphanet, Paris, France, 4 Service <strong>of</strong> Genetic Medicine, Geneva,<br />

Switzerland.<br />

The outcome <strong>of</strong> genetic testing has a great impact on the life <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

and their entourage . The quality <strong>of</strong> genetic testing is thus <strong>of</strong><br />

utmost importance . In July 2007, EuroGentest released a <strong>European</strong><br />

Quality Assurance (QAu) database in collaboration with Orphanet, with<br />

reliable public information about the quality systems <strong>of</strong> laboratories<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering medical genetic testing (http://www .eurogentest .org/web/qa/<br />

basic .xhtml) . The database contains at present data from about 230<br />

laboratories <strong>of</strong> 32 countries .<br />

These data comprise besides laboratory contact details and a link to<br />

the Orphanet laboratory page, information about the quality manager,<br />

the accreditation status with a link to the accreditation scope if applicable,<br />

and about participation in genetic EQA schemes .<br />

During 2004 and 2005, 152 <strong>of</strong> the 230 laboratories (66%) participated<br />

together in 87 different EQA schemes; mainly for CF testing (51%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EQA participating laboratories), DNA sequencing (34%) and<br />

FRAXA (31%) . Of the laboratories participating in EQA, 28% are also<br />

accredited according to standards ISO 17025 or ISO 15189 . Another<br />

23% <strong>of</strong> laboratories are preparing for accreditation in the near future .<br />

The EuroGentest QAu database allows consumers (laboratories, doctors,<br />

etc) to identify a laboratory with a quality system for a particular<br />

diagnostic test. It benefits laboratories by encouraging and providing<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> their investment in QAu as well as by giving them a better<br />

informed choice for referral <strong>of</strong> tests .<br />

The database will be continually updated and participation in the database<br />

is freely open to all <strong>European</strong> laboratories <strong>of</strong>fering human medical<br />

genetic testing . For more information, please contact QAusurvey@<br />

eurogentest .org .<br />

P09.16<br />

Definitions <strong>of</strong> genetic testing in <strong>European</strong> and other national<br />

legislation (EuroGentest WP3.4)<br />

O. Varga1,2 , J. Sequeiros1,3 ;<br />

1 2 IBMC, Porto, Portugal, School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Public Health, UD<br />

MHSC, Debrecen, Hungary, 3ICBAS, Porto, Portugal.<br />

We are comparing definitions <strong>of</strong> genetic testing among legislation from<br />

<strong>European</strong> institutions and individual Member States, as well that produced<br />

in the USA, Canada, Japan and Australia .<br />

Investigation is based on documents collected from websites and databases,<br />

including governmental sources, as well as that gathered<br />

within WP3 .1 and the series <strong>European</strong> Ethical-Legal Papers, being<br />

published by EuroGentest Unit 6 .<br />

We checked the present status and validity <strong>of</strong> all legislation used: only<br />

those still in force will be analyzed and compared; when validity check<br />

is currently not possible, due to unavailability or language incompat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!