2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Concurrent Sessions<br />
identified 215 carriers for one <strong>of</strong> the diseases and 14 carrier couples.<br />
Carrier frequency for MRT3, SMA, SMARD and cystic fibrosis was<br />
1:11, 1:13 and 1:10 and 1:21, respectively . Among carrier couples, 15<br />
pregnancies were recorded and 2 pregnancies <strong>of</strong> affected fetuses terminated<br />
. More than 50% <strong>of</strong> carrier couples accepted prenatal testing .<br />
While the women in the village were willing to collaborate, an increase<br />
in the willingness to collaborate among men was observed gradually .<br />
The availability <strong>of</strong> genetic counseling locally and education <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
are essential for the success <strong>of</strong> the prevention program . Ethical<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> preventative programs based on genetic screening <strong>of</strong><br />
premarital, pre-conceptual couples or couples during pregnancy will<br />
be discussed .<br />
c14.4<br />
Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment<br />
models in clinical practice: which model to choose?<br />
C. J. Van Asperen 1 , G. H. De Bock 2 , B. Siegerink 1,3 , C. E. Jacobi 3 ;<br />
1 Center for <strong>Human</strong> and Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2 Dept. Epidemiology,<br />
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,<br />
3 Dept. Medical Decision Making, Leiden, The Netherlands.<br />
Background: Models regarding breast cancer risk assessment focus<br />
on family history and some use personal risk factors additionally . Aim<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study is to show differences and similarities between the different<br />
models in risk estimates for breast cancer in healthy women from<br />
BRCA1/2-negative or untested families .<br />
methods: After a systematic literature search seven models were selected:<br />
Gail-2, Claus Model, Claus Tables, BOADICEA, Jonker Model,<br />
Claus-Extended Formula, and Tyrer-Cuzick . Life-time risks (LTRs) for<br />
developing breast cancer were estimated for two healthy counsellees<br />
with variety in family histories and personal risk factors . The estimated<br />
LTRs and the threshold for individual mammographic screening based<br />
on guidelines were compared .<br />
Results: Without a clinically significant family history LTRs varied from<br />
6 .7% (Gail-2 model) to 12 .8% (Tyrer-Cuzick Model) . For counsellees<br />
with low and moderate risk, the models mostly agreed. Difficulties in<br />
screening decisions were encountered in some moderate and high risk<br />
individuals, and when including personal risk factors into the estimations<br />
.<br />
conclusion: Older models (i .e . Gail-2 and Claus) are likely to underestimate<br />
the LTR for developing breast cancer as their baseline risk<br />
for women without a significant history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer is too low.<br />
Current guidelines have been formulated on breast cancer risks based<br />
on family history alone . When models include personal risk factors,<br />
surveillance thresholds have to be reformulated as other factors are<br />
applied . For current clinical practice, the Tyrer-Cuzick Model and the<br />
BOADICEA Model seem good choices .<br />
c14.5<br />
treatable and untreatable diseases in the neonatal-screening<br />
programme: the opinion <strong>of</strong> future parents in the Netherlands<br />
A. C. Plass1,2 , L. Krijgsman1,2 , L. Gieling1,2 , C. G. van El1,2 , T. Pieters1 , M. C.<br />
Cornel1,2 ;<br />
1 2 VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EMGO-institute,<br />
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.<br />
In the Netherlands, in 2007, the neonatal screening program was expanded<br />
from 3 to 17 disorders for which screening met the Wilson and<br />
Jungner criteria, especially regarding treatability . The desicion whether<br />
or not to add diseases to the newborn screening programme has <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
been made by expert groups, whereas the opinion <strong>of</strong> those whom<br />
it concerns: the parents-to-be remains unknown . In our research we<br />
investigated the opinion <strong>of</strong> future parents concerning screening newborns<br />
also for incurable, but to some extent treatable or even untreatable<br />
disorders .<br />
A structured questionnaire consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 parts in which similar questions<br />
were posed about treatable, incurable, but treatable, and untreatable<br />
childhood onset disorder was posted on the website <strong>of</strong> a national<br />
pregnancy fair. 1631 prospective parents filled out the questionnaire.<br />
259 were excluded because they did not meet our inclusion criteria .<br />
In contrast to current policy, overall they showed a positive attitude<br />
towards inclusion <strong>of</strong> incurable, but treatable [88%] or non-treatable<br />
disorders [73%] within the national newborns screening programme .<br />
Respondents who already had children at the time <strong>of</strong> filling out the<br />
questionnaire were even more in favour <strong>of</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> childhood dis-<br />
orders, especially untreatable diseases . The most important reason<br />
mentioned was: to prevent a long diagnostic quest . Obtaining information<br />
to enable reproductive choices in future pregnancies was hardly<br />
mentioned .<br />
Since a relevant part <strong>of</strong> the Dutch population seems interested in considering<br />
screening newborns for untreatable disorders we argue that<br />
further debate is needed between policy, public and health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
to discuss pros and cons .<br />
c14.6<br />
Promoting clinically relevant genetics education for medical<br />
trainees: the importance <strong>of</strong> educational outcomes and resources<br />
for each stage <strong>of</strong> medical training<br />
M. Martyn 1 , S. Burke 2 , C. Bennett 1 , A. Stone 3 , E. Harvey 1 , R. Newton 1 , P. Farndon<br />
1 ;<br />
1 NHS National <strong>Genetics</strong> Education and Development Centre, Birmingham,<br />
United Kingdom, 2 Centre for Research in Medical and Dental Education,<br />
Birmingham, United Kingdom, 3 Thornley Street Practice, 40 Thornley Street,<br />
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.<br />
It is widely acknowledged that the genetics education <strong>of</strong> healthcare<br />
staff across the world has not kept pace with advances in genetics .<br />
The NHS National <strong>Genetics</strong> Education and Development Centre is<br />
working to address this situation in the UK by promoting clinically relevant<br />
genetics education for healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals across all stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> education and training . To achieve this, it is important to develop<br />
clinically relevant educational outcomes and to identify and develop<br />
resources to support these across all stages <strong>of</strong> training . This will be<br />
illustrated by results from the UK .<br />
The first step in promoting clinically relevant genetics education was to<br />
develop educational outcomes linked to clinical practice at each stage<br />
<strong>of</strong> training . Outcomes have been developed for medical students and<br />
general practice and specialty trainees by working with health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
to define genetics relevant to practice for these stages <strong>of</strong><br />
training . To promote incorporation <strong>of</strong> these outcomes into curricula,<br />
the Centre worked with education bodies to raise awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> clinically relevant genetics education .<br />
Now the outcomes have been incorporated into medical training curricula,<br />
the Centre is focusing on supporting teachers and learners<br />
through the development and evaluation <strong>of</strong> learning and teaching resources<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>essional development for educators . Resources covering<br />
core genetics concepts for medical students and resources to<br />
support general practice training are currently being developed .<br />
The educational outcomes and many <strong>of</strong> the resources will be made<br />
freely available online at www .geneticseducation .nhs .uk and may be<br />
<strong>of</strong> use to those involved in genetics education across Europe .<br />
c15.1<br />
systemic antisense-mediated exon skipping studies in mouse<br />
models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy<br />
A. Aartsma-Rus1 , H. A. Heemskerk1 , C. L. de Winter1 , M. van Putten1 , A. A. M.<br />
Janson2 , S. de Kimpe2 , J. C. T. van Deutekom2 , G. B. van Ommen1 ;<br />
1 2 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, Prosensa BV,<br />
Leiden, The Netherlands.<br />
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe, progressive neuromuscular<br />
disorder leading to loss <strong>of</strong> muscle function and generally premature<br />
death before the age <strong>of</strong> 30 . The disease is caused by mutations<br />
in the DMD gene that disrupt the open reading frame and lead to complete<br />
abolishment <strong>of</strong> functional dystrophin . Our group has pioneered<br />
antisense-based exon skipping to restore the reading frame . Here,<br />
antisense oligoribonucleotides (AONs) induce specific exon skipping<br />
during pre-mRNA splicing . They have been successful in repairing the<br />
disrupted open reading frame and the generation <strong>of</strong> internally deleted,<br />
partially functional Becker-like dystrophins . Pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> concept has been<br />
achieved in cultured muscle cells from patients and the mdx mouse<br />
model . Recently, exon 51 skipping and dystrophin restoration was<br />
confirmed after a single intramuscular dose <strong>of</strong> AON in a local-administration<br />
clinical trial in 4 patients . Our current research focuses on optimizing<br />
systemic delivery <strong>of</strong> 2’-O-methyl phosphorothioate AONs and<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> different routes <strong>of</strong> administration and dosing regimes .<br />
We show that after systemic injection, AONs are preferentially taken<br />
up by dystrophic muscle compared to healthy fibers. Furthermore, we<br />
were able to induce exon skipping and dystrophin restoration in all<br />
muscles, including the heart after short term treatment with high AON