2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Prenental diagnostics<br />
However, universal fetal markers would allow its diffusion to a wider<br />
number <strong>of</strong> applications and clinical cases .<br />
More recently epigenetics has shown encouraging results toward this<br />
goal . Our aim was to investigate the methylation status <strong>of</strong> selected<br />
promoter regions <strong>of</strong> chromosome 18 genes in maternal blood and placenta<br />
samples .<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 36 genes on chromosome 18 were selected after database<br />
search for sequences with different expression patterns in placenta<br />
and blood . Primers were designed to analyse as much CpG islands<br />
as possible in 102 promoter sequences for the presence <strong>of</strong> different<br />
methylation patterns in fetal tissue (CVS) and whole blood (WB) . Digestion<br />
with 4 methylation-dependent restriction enzymes was carried<br />
out on extracted DNA samples prior to PCR amplification to investigate<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> differentially methylated sequences .<br />
Two promoter regions were found hypermethylated in CVS and hypomethylated<br />
in WB . One more gene promoter was found with the<br />
opposite pattern being hypomethylated in CVS and hypermethylated<br />
in WB .<br />
In this study we found three genes on chromosome 18 with apparently<br />
differentially methylated promoters between placenta and whole blood .<br />
We are in the process <strong>of</strong> developing assays to detect the placental<br />
form in maternal plasma. These preliminary results confirm the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> an epigenetic approach to find biomarkers for the analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> free fetal DNA in maternal plasma .<br />
P03.42<br />
Screening and nuchal translucency in first and second<br />
trimester: efficiency in the selection <strong>of</strong> pregnant women at risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> chromosomopathies<br />
A. Sánchez 1,2 , N. Clusellas 1 , C. Morales 1 , J. Bruguera 3 , I. Mademont 4 , R. Queralt<br />
1 , V. Borobio 5 , A. Borrell 5,2 , E. Casals 1 , A. Soler 1,2 ;<br />
1 Servei de Bioquímica i Genètica Molecular, Hospital Clínic, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain,<br />
2 IDIBAPS, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain, 3 Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica,<br />
<strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain, 4 CIBERER, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain, 5 Servei de Medicina Matern<strong>of</strong>etal,<br />
Hospital Clínic, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain.<br />
First trimester screening for trisomy 21 is provided by a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free<br />
β-hCG and PAPP-A concentration between 11-13 weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation.<br />
The detection rate <strong>of</strong> trisomy 21 is 90% with a false positive rate <strong>of</strong><br />
5% which is superior to the 65% achieved by second-trimester serum<br />
biochemistry . We report a series <strong>of</strong> 5285 gestations that were referred<br />
to maternal-fetal medicine department between 2003 and 2007 who<br />
underwent an invasive prenatal diagnosis . A total <strong>of</strong> 1986 samples<br />
were CVS and 3299 were amniotic fluid samples. In first trimester the<br />
12,7% <strong>of</strong> the samples were referred due to positive combined screening<br />
(+SC) and the 13,7% due to increased nuchal translucency (INT)<br />
as unique abnormal parameter . In second trimester the 39% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
samples were referred for positive second trimester screening and<br />
the 2,5% for increased nuchal translucency . In the second trimester<br />
samples the 1,4% <strong>of</strong> +SC and the 9,3% <strong>of</strong> INT showed a chromosomopathy.<br />
In the first trimester samples the 12% <strong>of</strong> +SC and 25% <strong>of</strong><br />
INT presented chromosomal abnormalities. In first trimester we must<br />
perform 5,5 invasive procedures to find a chromosomopathy in group<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with the reported indications, whereas in the second trimester<br />
53 invasive procedures are needed to detect a chromosomal<br />
abnormality. These results emphasise the higher efficiency <strong>of</strong> first trimester<br />
screening over the second besides the medical advantages <strong>of</strong><br />
an early diagnosis .<br />
P03.43<br />
First-trimester screening protocols and their impact in<br />
cytogenetic counselling<br />
C. Cotarelo-Pérez, R. Oancea, M. Fenollar-Cortés, M. Ortega-de-Heredia, J.<br />
Montalvo-Montes, M. Lautre-Ecenarro;<br />
Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.<br />
In the last few years, we have referred an increase <strong>of</strong> diagnosis prenatal<br />
(DP) due to advanced maternal age and more knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
general population about possible diagnosis methods . The assumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> first-trimester screening protocols (ultrasound and biochemistry<br />
methods) has allowed to generalize the DP to all pregnant women, independently<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternal age . We present our results after seven years<br />
with the combined test and its impact on the cytogenetics prenatal<br />
diagnosis . We analyzed data from 5743 singleton pregnancies under-<br />
going prenatal genetic counselling from the area 7 <strong>of</strong> Madrid . 4930<br />
woman where testing by first-trimester combined biochemistry and<br />
ultrasound nuchal translucency screening . In 1998, 13% <strong>of</strong> the pregnant<br />
women renounced amniocentesis opposite a 50% <strong>of</strong> renounces<br />
in 2007. The implementing <strong>of</strong> first-trimester screening has reduced the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> amniocentesis and made an individual better earlier genetic<br />
counselling .<br />
P03.44<br />
Prenatal Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a fetus with 44 chromosomes and<br />
homozygous Robertsonian translocations (14;21)<br />
S. Sodia, W. Emberger, H. Zierler, M. Speicher;<br />
Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.<br />
We report the rare finding <strong>of</strong> a human fetus with 44 chromosomes<br />
due to homozygous Robertsonian translocations (14;21) . The related<br />
parents, born in Turkey, were referred to our Genetic Department for<br />
genetic counselling at 16th weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation due to advanced maternal<br />
age . Amniocentesis was performed and the analysis <strong>of</strong> amniotic<br />
fluid cells revealed 44 chromosomes with a homozygous Robertsonian<br />
translocations (14;21):<br />
44,XX,der(14;21)(q10;q10),der(14,21)(q10;q10) . At the time <strong>of</strong> amniocentesis<br />
there were no pathological ultrasound findings. Karyotyping<br />
<strong>of</strong> the consanguineous parents showed in each case the same heterozygous<br />
Robertsonian translocations(14;21) . Family history revealed<br />
that the translocation has segregated through at least four generations<br />
. Because UPD testing should be considered in fetuses carrying a<br />
balanced Robertsonian translocation involving chromosomes 14 or 15,<br />
we excluded in our case UPD 14 . Although Robertsonian translocations<br />
are common chromosomal rearrangements, homozygous carriers<br />
are rare . Previously reported single case reports showed no evidence<br />
for an increased risk for malformations or dysmorphic features in carriers<br />
<strong>of</strong> homozygous Robertsonian translocations .<br />
P03.45<br />
Prenatally detected mosaicism - 46,X,idic(Y)(q11.2)/45,X. A case<br />
report<br />
P. Tammur, K. Kuuse, P. Ilisson, M. Sitska;<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>, Tartu, Estonia.<br />
Isodicentric Y chromosomes are inherently unstable and may be lost<br />
during mitosis resulting in mosaicism, generally including a 45,X cell<br />
line . Clinical presentations in patients with mosaicism for a structurally<br />
abnormal Y chromosome can range from classical Turner phenotype<br />
through mixed gonadal dysgenesis to phenotypically normal males .<br />
The variability in sexual phenotype is thought to be related to the tissue<br />
distribution, to the proportion <strong>of</strong> each cell line and to the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />
breakpoints . However, prenatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> mosaic 46,X,idic(Y)/45,X<br />
is rare, and poses a serious dilemma concerning the prognosis related<br />
to the fetal stature, sexual differentiation and the risk development <strong>of</strong><br />
gonadoblastoma .<br />
In our case amniocentesis was performed to a 33-year-old women<br />
because <strong>of</strong> positive serum screening on the 15 week <strong>of</strong> pregnancy .<br />
Cultured amniocytes from two different culture flasks revealed mosaic<br />
karyotype 46,X,+mar[36]/45,X[14] . For detecting the origin <strong>of</strong> marker<br />
chromosome, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed<br />
1)with X and Y centromeric probes (AneuVysion, X, Y-alpha satellite<br />
probe) and 2) XYpter subtelomere specific probe (Cytocell). FISH<br />
analysis revealed that the marker chromosome was isodicentric Y<br />
chromosome with two short arms and a small portion <strong>of</strong> the long arm:<br />
46,X,idic(Y)(q11 .2)[41]/45,X[44] . After further genetic counselling, the<br />
parents opted for termination <strong>of</strong> the pregnancy . Postmortem examination<br />
revealed male fetus with microanomalies and no major abnormalities<br />
. Cytogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> the placenta showed mosaicism in a different<br />
degree 46,X,idic(Y)(q11 .2)[46]/45,X[4] and mosaicism was also<br />
found in fetal tissues .<br />
P03.46<br />
is informed choice in the context <strong>of</strong> prenatal testing a<br />
universally held value?<br />
A. van den Heuvel1 , E. Dormandy1 , L. Chitty2 , T. M. Marteau1 ;<br />
1 2 King’s College London, Institute <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom, Institute<br />
<strong>of</strong> Child Health and UCLH, London, United Kingdom.<br />
Background: Informed choice is central to prenatal testing and endorsed<br />
by many national and international guidelines for prenatal