2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cytogenetics<br />
matozoa from carriers <strong>of</strong> chromosome aberrations allows to understand<br />
peculiarities <strong>of</strong> meiotic divisions and get information about risk <strong>of</strong><br />
conceiving chromosome inbalanced <strong>of</strong>fspring .<br />
FISH with specific DNA probes heteroploidy fraquency was scored in<br />
decondenced sperm from 3 patients with chromosome aberrations:<br />
46,XY,t(2;3)(q33;q29) - case 1; 46,XY,inv(4)(p12q21),inv(10)(p11q21)<br />
- case 2 and 45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10) - case 3 .<br />
In case 1 disomy frequency <strong>of</strong> chromosome involved in this rearrangement<br />
increased (up to 3,01%) . In case 2 disomy frequency <strong>of</strong> inverted<br />
chromosome (0,9%) was compared to this one the <strong>of</strong> other autosomes<br />
(1,06% for chromosome 7; 0,9% for chromosome 9) . Frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
diploidy was higher in patients with robertsonian (case 3) and recoprocal<br />
translocations (case1) (1,48% and 2,05%, respectively) compared<br />
to patient with invertions (0,54%) . Frequency <strong>of</strong> heteroploidy are in<br />
agreement with spermiological analysis (WHO standard): patients<br />
46,XY,t(2;3)(q33;q29) and 45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10) feature oligoastenozoospermia,<br />
in contrast to patient 46,XY,inv(4)(p12q21),inv(10)(p1<br />
1q21) having astenospermia .<br />
Our data suggest that spermiological analysis can be linked to the<br />
karyotype abberations and carriers <strong>of</strong> chromosome aberrations with<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> sperm concentration have poor fertility prognosis .<br />
Supported by CRDF and RFBR .<br />
P02.225<br />
A Y chromosome with three short arms in a male with a<br />
45,X/46,X,psu dic(Y) karyotype<br />
K. Hansson, K. Szuhai, J. Knijnenburg, F. Hes, E. Bakker, J. Smit, W. vd Ende,<br />
M. Hoogenboom, C. Knepflé, K. Madan;<br />
Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.<br />
We report a case with an unusual pseudo-dicentric Y chromosome with<br />
three short arm segments. When the male patient was first referred for<br />
karyotyping because <strong>of</strong> hypogonadism and mental retardation more<br />
than 30 years ago, he was found to have a mosaic karyotype with two<br />
cell lines, one 45,X and the other with an abnormal non-fluorescent Y<br />
chromosome . The father had a normal Y chromosome . At the age <strong>of</strong><br />
47, the patient was referred again for cytogenetic analysis because<br />
<strong>of</strong> his mental retardation . Mutation analysis in connection with thyroid<br />
dysfunction revealed a thyroid hormone receptor beta (TRb) germline<br />
mutation . FISH studies revealed a complex rearrangement with an<br />
alternating pattern <strong>of</strong> Y short and long arm material: short-long-shortlong-short<br />
. Using probes for the subtelomeric regions two signals with<br />
the Ypter probe was found whereas no signal was observed with the<br />
subtelomeric Yq probe . Two signals were also found using probes for<br />
the centromeric region and the SHOX gene . In contrast, FISH with<br />
a probe for the SRY gene revealed three signals on the abnormal Y<br />
chromosome: two on the short arms <strong>of</strong> the dicentric and an extra signal<br />
in the short arm segment situated in the middle <strong>of</strong> the rearranged<br />
Y chromosome . DNA-studies are in progress to further elucidate the<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> this complex Y chromosome rearrangement .<br />
P02.226<br />
cytogenetic Analysis <strong>of</strong> infertile iranian men<br />
S. Soleimani1 , M. Zamaniyan1 , M. Montazeri2 , F. Nasiri1 , F. Mortezapoor1 , M.<br />
Rahnama1 , F. Mahjoobi1 ;<br />
1The Blood Transfusion Organization Research Center, Tehran, Islamic Republic<br />
<strong>of</strong> Iran, 2NRCGEB, Tehran, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran.<br />
Male infertility factor accounts for about half the cases <strong>of</strong> couple infertility<br />
.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the chromosomal changes (aberrations) which seem effective<br />
in men infertility include:<br />
1 . Balanced chromosomal translocation<br />
2 . Chromosome inversion<br />
3 . Marker chromosome<br />
4 . Sex chromosome abnormality<br />
Our investigation provides the circumstantial and direct evidences<br />
which confirm the importance <strong>of</strong> the sex chromosome in reproductive<br />
disorders . We have analyzed (7years study) 845 blood samples from<br />
infertile men which 617 <strong>of</strong> them were oligospermic and azoospermic .<br />
Constitutional chromosome aberrations were diagnosed in 278 <strong>of</strong><br />
these patients . We have observed 29 .2% chromosomal abnormality in<br />
azoospermia men that is compatible with the data from literature .<br />
The following abnormal chromosome complements were found:<br />
46,XX;47XXY;47,XYY;48,XXXY;45,X[10]/46,XY[134];46,XY[4]/<br />
47,XXY[82];<br />
46,XX[11]/47,XXY[36];46,XY[6]/47,XYY[38];46,XY[10]/46,XX[26]/<br />
47,XXY[61];<br />
46,X,del(Y)(q 11 . 23 );46,X,inv(Y)(p 11 . 2 ;q 11 . 22 ) .<br />
We have found some patients with complex structural and aneupoloidy<br />
abnormalities:<br />
× 46,XX,inv(9)(p 11; q 13 )/47,XXY,inv(9)(p 11; q 13 )[4]<br />
× 47,XXY[93]/48,XXY+mar[4]/48,XXXY[2]<br />
× 47,XXY,inv(9)(p 11; q 13 )<br />
× 47,XXY,t(1;17)(p 36 .1; q 21 )<br />
× 46,X,del(Y)(q 11 . 2 )[98]/45,X[6]<br />
× 47,XXY,inv(9)(p 11; q 13 )/t(10;22)(q 26 .3; q 13 .1 )<br />
× 46,X,idic(Y)(p 11 .32 ; q 11 .32 )[27]/45,X[36]/46,XY[2]<br />
We believe that many infertilities especially severe oligospermic and<br />
azoospermic cases raise the need for a cytogenetic analysis besides<br />
molecular techniques to reveal the existence <strong>of</strong> any genetic abnormalities.<br />
P02.227<br />
meiotic studies in spermatocytes from fertile males<br />
L. Uroz 1 , O. Rajmil 2 , C. Templado 1 ;<br />
1 Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular i Genètica Mèdica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat<br />
Autònoma de <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Bellaterra, Spain, 2 Servei d’Andrologia, Fundació<br />
Puigvert, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain.<br />
BACKGROUND: Meiotic chromosome abnormalities are associated<br />
with male infertility . However, little is known about meiotic process in<br />
men <strong>of</strong> proven fertility . We carried out meiotic studies in spermatocytes<br />
to establish the base line level <strong>of</strong> meiotic abnormalities in fertile males .<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Testicular biopsies were obtained from<br />
11 fertile males aged 30-47 . Meiotic spreads were prepared by the airdrying<br />
technique and cells were stained with DAPI . RESULTS: Meiotic<br />
progression was analysed at pachytene, metaphase I and metaphase<br />
II stages, counting 1,000 pachytene spermatocytes per individual . All<br />
males showed a normal meiotic progression, with a proportion <strong>of</strong> metaphase<br />
II to metaphase I higher than 0 .5 . A total <strong>of</strong> 848 spermatocytes<br />
at metaphase I was studied . The overall percentage <strong>of</strong> dissociated sex<br />
chromosomes was 21 .7% . Autosomal synaptic abnormalities were<br />
found in 0 .9% <strong>of</strong> spermatocytes I (medium-sized bivalents with one<br />
chiasmata or small bivalents as two separated univalents) . Only 0 .2%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the spermatocytes I analysed were hyperploid . Hypoploidy was not<br />
evaluated, since it could be due to technical artefacts . The percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> structural chromosome aberrations per individual ranged from 0% to<br />
5 .8% . The total mean chiasma frequency was 51 .0, ranging from 48 .7<br />
to 53 .0 . CONCLUSION: The incidence <strong>of</strong> meiotic abnormalities (both<br />
chromosomal and synaptic abnormalities), as well as spermatocyte<br />
distribution and chiasma count in fertile males could be used as reference<br />
data in further studies on males with idiopathic infertility .<br />
Acknowledgements: This work received financial support from The<br />
Generalitat de Catalunya (2005SGR-00495, 2005FI00399)<br />
P02.228<br />
increased autosomal structural aberrations in human<br />
spermatozoa regarding age<br />
C. Templado 1 , A. Donate 1 , J. Giraldo 2 , O. Rajmil 3 , M. Bosch 1 ;<br />
1 Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular i Genètica Mèdica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat<br />
Autònoma de <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Bellaterra, Spain, 2 Unitat de Bioestadistica<br />
and Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Bellaterra,<br />
Spain, 3 Servei d’Andrologia, Fundació Puigvert, <strong>Barcelona</strong>, Spain.<br />
Background: Although most <strong>of</strong> de novo structural aberrations are paternal<br />
in origin, little information is avaible on the relationship between<br />
advanced paternal age and structural chromosome abnormalities in<br />
human spermatozoa . Objective: To explore the age effect on the frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> structural abnormalities in human spermatozoa . methods:<br />
Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with a panel <strong>of</strong> 62 specific<br />
probes was used in spermatozoa to screen all 22 autosomes for duplications<br />
and deletions . Sperm samples were collected from 10 healthy<br />
males: five males aged 24-37 (mean age 27.8 years) and five males<br />
aged 60-74 (mean age 66 .4 years) . A total <strong>of</strong> 150,000 sperm nuclei<br />
were scored by multicolour FISH, analysing 1,000 spermatozoa per<br />
donor and per autosome . Results: The frequency <strong>of</strong> structural abnormalities<br />
per individual ranged from 4 .2% to 7 .8% . The mean percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> autosomal duplications was significantly greater (P < .05)<br />
in older donors (4 .5%) when compared with that in younger donors<br />
0