2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cytogenetics<br />
sented with ambiguous genitalia . The 1 st case was reared as male and<br />
had right palpable gonad, uterus and left streak gonad . Its karyotype<br />
was 45,X/45,der(X)/46,X,der(X) .ish der(X)t(X;Y)(p22 .3;p11 .3)(DXZ1<br />
+,DYZ3+,SRY+,KAL+,telXp-/Yp-) . The second case reared as a female<br />
and had right testis, a uterus and left ovary with some follicles .<br />
The karyotype was 45,X/46,X,+mar.ish idic(Y)(qter→p11.3::p11.3→<br />
qter)(wcpY+,DYZ3++,SRY+,telYp-) .The 1 st case diagnosed as mixed<br />
gonadal dysgenesis and the second as true hermaphroditism .To our<br />
knowledge this is the 1st case <strong>of</strong> true hermaphroditism with this distal<br />
break points . The other 4 cases presented with primary amenorrhea<br />
and short stature . Karyotype <strong>of</strong> 3 rd case was 45,X/46,X,+mar .<br />
ish idic(Y)(pter→q11::q11→pter)(DYZ3++,SRY++).The 4 th case had<br />
46,X,der(X) ish. Der(X)(pter→q21::p22.1→pter)(DXZ1+,XIST+,telXp+<br />
+,STS++), the 5 th case had severe short stature and her karyotype was<br />
46,X,der(X). ish der(X)(qter→p11.2::p11.2→qter)(wcp X+, DXZ1++).<br />
The 6 th case had 46,X,der(X).ish idic(X)(pter→q25::q25→pter)(wcpX<br />
+DXZ1++,XIST++,telXp++) .<br />
A team <strong>of</strong> specialists collaborated together to give the proper genetic<br />
counseling and follow-up specially for cases with Y chromosome who<br />
had the risk <strong>of</strong> gonadoblastoma .We recommend further investigations<br />
using Array CGH for identification <strong>of</strong> duplication / deletion in different<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> sex chromosomes .<br />
P02.197<br />
molecular cytogenetic characterization <strong>of</strong> a small supernumerary<br />
marker chromosome derived from chromosome 11 in a mother<br />
and a child with distinct phenotypes<br />
J. B. Melo 1 , E. Matoso 1 , M. R. Lima 2 , L. Backx 3 , J. R. Vermeesch 3 , N. Kosyakova<br />
4 , T. Liehr 4 , I. M. Carreira 1 ;<br />
1 Laboratório de Citogenética and Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular,<br />
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2 Instituto<br />
Genética Médica Jacinto Magalhães, Porto, Portugal, 3 Center for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />
University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 4 Institut für <strong>Human</strong>genetik<br />
und Anthropologie, Jena, Germany.<br />
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are defined as<br />
structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be identified or characterized<br />
unambiguously by conventional banding cytogenetics alone,<br />
and are generally equal in size or smaller than a chromosome 20 <strong>of</strong><br />
the same metaphase spread . sSMC derived from chromosome 11 are<br />
rare and, so far, it is not yet clear which regions <strong>of</strong> chromosome 11 are<br />
critical and have clinical consequences .<br />
We report a mother and a child with a karyotype 47,XX,+mar[21]/<br />
46,XX[9] and 47,XY,+mar[25]/46,XY[5], respectively . After centromeric<br />
FISH the origin <strong>of</strong> the sSMC was ascertained as derived from chromosome<br />
11 . Subcentromeric FISH revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> two different<br />
shapes <strong>of</strong> the sSMC in the mother, with apparently the following<br />
breakpoints - ish r(11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[2]/min(11)(p:11 .12~11 .2-<br />
>q12:)[7]; and three different shapes <strong>of</strong> the sSMC in the child<br />
- ish r(11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[6]/r(11;11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::<br />
p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[3]/min(11)(p:11 .12~11 .2->q12:)[4] . The sSMC<br />
was microdissected and amplified by DOP-PCR. The amplified DNA<br />
was analysed by array painting, using fulltilling array specific for chromosome<br />
11 (with 100-150 kB resolution) . An unexpected result revealed<br />
an unusual sSMC . A maternal uniparental dissomy <strong>of</strong> chromosome<br />
11 was excluded . The child presents a more severe phenotype,<br />
with facial dysmorphisms, strabism, ptosis, mental retardation and<br />
developmental delay . The mother has a congenital cardiopathy and no<br />
apparent mental retardation .<br />
Molecular cytogenetics techniques are a valuable tool for the accurate<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> the genetic origin and content <strong>of</strong> sSMC, contributing to<br />
a better genotyphe/phenotype correlation .<br />
Supported in parts by the Erwin-Riesch Stiftung.<br />
P02.198<br />
three de novo deletions, one transposition, and one inversion <strong>of</strong><br />
chromosome 6 in a patient with complete absence <strong>of</strong> expressive<br />
speech and reduced pain perception<br />
M. Poot 1 , R. van ‘t Slot 1 , R. Leupert 2 , V. Beyer 2 , E. Passarge 3 , T. Haaf 2 ;<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2 Institut für<br />
<strong>Human</strong>genetik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 3 Institut<br />
für <strong>Human</strong>genetik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.<br />
Using the Infinium <strong>Human</strong>Hap300 Genotyping BeadChip SNP array<br />
and BAC-based FISH we found three adjacent, but non-contiguous<br />
de novo deletions, one transposition and one pericentric inversion <strong>of</strong> a<br />
chromosome 6 in a patient whose karyotype was previously described<br />
by banding analysis as 46,XX,del(6)(q13q15),inv(6)(p11 .2q15) . In addition<br />
to the deletion <strong>of</strong> band 6q14 detected previously by classic cytogenetics,<br />
we found two additional microdeletions . The most distal<br />
one is a 360 kb deletion in band 6p12 .3, containing the genes RHAG,<br />
CRISP1, 2, and 3, and PGK2 . The second deletion in 6p12 .2-p12 .1,<br />
containing the genes PKHD1, IL17, MCM3, EFHC1, and TRAM2<br />
genes is 1 .15 Mb in size . The deletion in region 6q14 .3-q16 .1, reported<br />
previously, was mapped more precisely and determined to be 11 .9<br />
Mb in size . It contains 27 genes, some <strong>of</strong> which are involved in pain<br />
sensation, growth regulation, and tissue modeling during development.<br />
The refined karyotype is 46,XX,der(6)(pter◊p12.3::p12.1◊p12.1::<br />
q14.3◊p12.1::p12.3◊p12.2::q16.1◊qter) or (pter◊p12.3::p12.1◊p12.1::<br />
q14.3◊p12.1::p12.2◊p12.3::q16.1◊qter).The main clinical features <strong>of</strong><br />
this 31-year-old women are dysmorphic facial features consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
a broad face, prominent glabella, broad nose, and hypertelorism, nonprogressive<br />
deficit <strong>of</strong> motor control, in particular a broad-based slowmotion-like<br />
gait, absence <strong>of</strong> speech development, inability to acquire<br />
and to comprehend theoretical knowledge, and reduced sensitivity to<br />
pain . The rearrangement <strong>of</strong> chromosome 6 presumably originated in<br />
a paternal meiosis . By combining the SNP array and FISH data we<br />
were able to completely map and to reconstruct this highly complex<br />
rearrangement in a single chromosome .<br />
P02.199<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> a small supernumerary marker<br />
chromosomes using cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic<br />
methods (two case reports)<br />
M. Miskovic 1 , T. Liehr 2 , M. Guc-Scekic 1,3 , A. Weise 2 , K. Mrasek 2 , T. Lalic 1 , N.<br />
Lakic 1 ;<br />
1 Mother and Child Health Care Institute <strong>of</strong> Serbia “Dr Vukan Cupic”, Belgrade,<br />
Serbia, 2 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> and Anthropology, Jena, Germany, 3 Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.<br />
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes(sSMC),defined as additional<br />
abnormal chromosomes, too small for characterization by<br />
conventional banding cytogenetics alone,are present in 0 .043% <strong>of</strong><br />
newborns and 0 .077% <strong>of</strong> prenatal cases .About 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the sSMC are<br />
correlated with a specific clinical picture,while most <strong>of</strong> the remaining<br />
sSMC have not yet been associated with clinical syndromes .<br />
We present two cases with sSMC in karyotype which were initially<br />
studied by GTG banding technique.To define origin <strong>of</strong> sSMC,additional<br />
molecular cytogenetic methods (FISH) were performed using probe<br />
sets:cenM-FISH and subcenM-FISH Mix for the corresponding chromosomes<br />
.<br />
Patient 1 had a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> total anomalous pulmonary venous return<br />
and facial dysmorphism .Here a mosaic karyotype 47,XX,+mar[22]/<br />
46,XX[11] was detected .The sSMC was characterized as an<br />
invdup(22)(q11 .21) .Similar cases were previously reported and the<br />
patient could now clinically be diagnosed as having a Cat-Eye syndrome<br />
.<br />
Patient 2 was a prenatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> 42-years old woman with fetal<br />
karyotype 47,XY,+mar(de novo) .In this case sSMC was characterized<br />
as an invdup(15)(q11 .1) .According to the literature similar cases didn’t<br />
show any clinical abnormalities .This type <strong>of</strong> sSMC is the most common<br />
(appears with 30% frequency) .<br />
It is difficult to predict precisely the phenotypic risk that could be associated<br />
with the presence <strong>of</strong> sSMC .The origin <strong>of</strong> sSMC is important<br />
factor in determining its possible phenotypic effect .Conventional cytogenetic<br />
techniques are limited .Molecular cytogenetic methods are<br />
necessary in terms <strong>of</strong> providing the information about marker origin<br />
and structure .It’s only way to establish phenotype-karyotype correlation<br />
and discuss the results in genetic counseling .<br />
Acknowledgments:Supported in parts by the DFG (436RUS17/135/<br />
03;436RUS17/109/04,436RUS17/22/06),Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds<br />
and the Evangelische Studienwerk e .V .Villigst .<br />
P02.200<br />
the Effect <strong>of</strong> chromosomal Rearrangements on Gene<br />
Expression<br />
A. Reymond 1 , F. Schütz 1 , J. Chrast 1 , M. Delorenzi 1 , W. A. Bickmore 2 , L. A. J.<br />
Harewood 1 ;<br />
1 Center for Integrative Genomics, University <strong>of</strong> Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzer-