24.08.2013 Views

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cytogenetics<br />

sented with ambiguous genitalia . The 1 st case was reared as male and<br />

had right palpable gonad, uterus and left streak gonad . Its karyotype<br />

was 45,X/45,der(X)/46,X,der(X) .ish der(X)t(X;Y)(p22 .3;p11 .3)(DXZ1<br />

+,DYZ3+,SRY+,KAL+,telXp-/Yp-) . The second case reared as a female<br />

and had right testis, a uterus and left ovary with some follicles .<br />

The karyotype was 45,X/46,X,+mar.ish idic(Y)(qter→p11.3::p11.3→<br />

qter)(wcpY+,DYZ3++,SRY+,telYp-) .The 1 st case diagnosed as mixed<br />

gonadal dysgenesis and the second as true hermaphroditism .To our<br />

knowledge this is the 1st case <strong>of</strong> true hermaphroditism with this distal<br />

break points . The other 4 cases presented with primary amenorrhea<br />

and short stature . Karyotype <strong>of</strong> 3 rd case was 45,X/46,X,+mar .<br />

ish idic(Y)(pter→q11::q11→pter)(DYZ3++,SRY++).The 4 th case had<br />

46,X,der(X) ish. Der(X)(pter→q21::p22.1→pter)(DXZ1+,XIST+,telXp+<br />

+,STS++), the 5 th case had severe short stature and her karyotype was<br />

46,X,der(X). ish der(X)(qter→p11.2::p11.2→qter)(wcp X+, DXZ1++).<br />

The 6 th case had 46,X,der(X).ish idic(X)(pter→q25::q25→pter)(wcpX<br />

+DXZ1++,XIST++,telXp++) .<br />

A team <strong>of</strong> specialists collaborated together to give the proper genetic<br />

counseling and follow-up specially for cases with Y chromosome who<br />

had the risk <strong>of</strong> gonadoblastoma .We recommend further investigations<br />

using Array CGH for identification <strong>of</strong> duplication / deletion in different<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> sex chromosomes .<br />

P02.197<br />

molecular cytogenetic characterization <strong>of</strong> a small supernumerary<br />

marker chromosome derived from chromosome 11 in a mother<br />

and a child with distinct phenotypes<br />

J. B. Melo 1 , E. Matoso 1 , M. R. Lima 2 , L. Backx 3 , J. R. Vermeesch 3 , N. Kosyakova<br />

4 , T. Liehr 4 , I. M. Carreira 1 ;<br />

1 Laboratório de Citogenética and Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular,<br />

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2 Instituto<br />

Genética Médica Jacinto Magalhães, Porto, Portugal, 3 Center for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>,<br />

University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 4 Institut für <strong>Human</strong>genetik<br />

und Anthropologie, Jena, Germany.<br />

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are defined as<br />

structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be identified or characterized<br />

unambiguously by conventional banding cytogenetics alone,<br />

and are generally equal in size or smaller than a chromosome 20 <strong>of</strong><br />

the same metaphase spread . sSMC derived from chromosome 11 are<br />

rare and, so far, it is not yet clear which regions <strong>of</strong> chromosome 11 are<br />

critical and have clinical consequences .<br />

We report a mother and a child with a karyotype 47,XX,+mar[21]/<br />

46,XX[9] and 47,XY,+mar[25]/46,XY[5], respectively . After centromeric<br />

FISH the origin <strong>of</strong> the sSMC was ascertained as derived from chromosome<br />

11 . Subcentromeric FISH revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> two different<br />

shapes <strong>of</strong> the sSMC in the mother, with apparently the following<br />

breakpoints - ish r(11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[2]/min(11)(p:11 .12~11 .2-<br />

>q12:)[7]; and three different shapes <strong>of</strong> the sSMC in the child<br />

- ish r(11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[6]/r(11;11)(::p11 .12~11 .2->q12::<br />

p11 .12~11 .2->q12::)[3]/min(11)(p:11 .12~11 .2->q12:)[4] . The sSMC<br />

was microdissected and amplified by DOP-PCR. The amplified DNA<br />

was analysed by array painting, using fulltilling array specific for chromosome<br />

11 (with 100-150 kB resolution) . An unexpected result revealed<br />

an unusual sSMC . A maternal uniparental dissomy <strong>of</strong> chromosome<br />

11 was excluded . The child presents a more severe phenotype,<br />

with facial dysmorphisms, strabism, ptosis, mental retardation and<br />

developmental delay . The mother has a congenital cardiopathy and no<br />

apparent mental retardation .<br />

Molecular cytogenetics techniques are a valuable tool for the accurate<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> the genetic origin and content <strong>of</strong> sSMC, contributing to<br />

a better genotyphe/phenotype correlation .<br />

Supported in parts by the Erwin-Riesch Stiftung.<br />

P02.198<br />

three de novo deletions, one transposition, and one inversion <strong>of</strong><br />

chromosome 6 in a patient with complete absence <strong>of</strong> expressive<br />

speech and reduced pain perception<br />

M. Poot 1 , R. van ‘t Slot 1 , R. Leupert 2 , V. Beyer 2 , E. Passarge 3 , T. Haaf 2 ;<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2 Institut für<br />

<strong>Human</strong>genetik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 3 Institut<br />

für <strong>Human</strong>genetik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.<br />

Using the Infinium <strong>Human</strong>Hap300 Genotyping BeadChip SNP array<br />

and BAC-based FISH we found three adjacent, but non-contiguous<br />

de novo deletions, one transposition and one pericentric inversion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

chromosome 6 in a patient whose karyotype was previously described<br />

by banding analysis as 46,XX,del(6)(q13q15),inv(6)(p11 .2q15) . In addition<br />

to the deletion <strong>of</strong> band 6q14 detected previously by classic cytogenetics,<br />

we found two additional microdeletions . The most distal<br />

one is a 360 kb deletion in band 6p12 .3, containing the genes RHAG,<br />

CRISP1, 2, and 3, and PGK2 . The second deletion in 6p12 .2-p12 .1,<br />

containing the genes PKHD1, IL17, MCM3, EFHC1, and TRAM2<br />

genes is 1 .15 Mb in size . The deletion in region 6q14 .3-q16 .1, reported<br />

previously, was mapped more precisely and determined to be 11 .9<br />

Mb in size . It contains 27 genes, some <strong>of</strong> which are involved in pain<br />

sensation, growth regulation, and tissue modeling during development.<br />

The refined karyotype is 46,XX,der(6)(pter◊p12.3::p12.1◊p12.1::<br />

q14.3◊p12.1::p12.3◊p12.2::q16.1◊qter) or (pter◊p12.3::p12.1◊p12.1::<br />

q14.3◊p12.1::p12.2◊p12.3::q16.1◊qter).The main clinical features <strong>of</strong><br />

this 31-year-old women are dysmorphic facial features consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

a broad face, prominent glabella, broad nose, and hypertelorism, nonprogressive<br />

deficit <strong>of</strong> motor control, in particular a broad-based slowmotion-like<br />

gait, absence <strong>of</strong> speech development, inability to acquire<br />

and to comprehend theoretical knowledge, and reduced sensitivity to<br />

pain . The rearrangement <strong>of</strong> chromosome 6 presumably originated in<br />

a paternal meiosis . By combining the SNP array and FISH data we<br />

were able to completely map and to reconstruct this highly complex<br />

rearrangement in a single chromosome .<br />

P02.199<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> a small supernumerary marker<br />

chromosomes using cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic<br />

methods (two case reports)<br />

M. Miskovic 1 , T. Liehr 2 , M. Guc-Scekic 1,3 , A. Weise 2 , K. Mrasek 2 , T. Lalic 1 , N.<br />

Lakic 1 ;<br />

1 Mother and Child Health Care Institute <strong>of</strong> Serbia “Dr Vukan Cupic”, Belgrade,<br />

Serbia, 2 Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> and Anthropology, Jena, Germany, 3 Faculty<br />

<strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.<br />

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes(sSMC),defined as additional<br />

abnormal chromosomes, too small for characterization by<br />

conventional banding cytogenetics alone,are present in 0 .043% <strong>of</strong><br />

newborns and 0 .077% <strong>of</strong> prenatal cases .About 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the sSMC are<br />

correlated with a specific clinical picture,while most <strong>of</strong> the remaining<br />

sSMC have not yet been associated with clinical syndromes .<br />

We present two cases with sSMC in karyotype which were initially<br />

studied by GTG banding technique.To define origin <strong>of</strong> sSMC,additional<br />

molecular cytogenetic methods (FISH) were performed using probe<br />

sets:cenM-FISH and subcenM-FISH Mix for the corresponding chromosomes<br />

.<br />

Patient 1 had a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> total anomalous pulmonary venous return<br />

and facial dysmorphism .Here a mosaic karyotype 47,XX,+mar[22]/<br />

46,XX[11] was detected .The sSMC was characterized as an<br />

invdup(22)(q11 .21) .Similar cases were previously reported and the<br />

patient could now clinically be diagnosed as having a Cat-Eye syndrome<br />

.<br />

Patient 2 was a prenatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> 42-years old woman with fetal<br />

karyotype 47,XY,+mar(de novo) .In this case sSMC was characterized<br />

as an invdup(15)(q11 .1) .According to the literature similar cases didn’t<br />

show any clinical abnormalities .This type <strong>of</strong> sSMC is the most common<br />

(appears with 30% frequency) .<br />

It is difficult to predict precisely the phenotypic risk that could be associated<br />

with the presence <strong>of</strong> sSMC .The origin <strong>of</strong> sSMC is important<br />

factor in determining its possible phenotypic effect .Conventional cytogenetic<br />

techniques are limited .Molecular cytogenetic methods are<br />

necessary in terms <strong>of</strong> providing the information about marker origin<br />

and structure .It’s only way to establish phenotype-karyotype correlation<br />

and discuss the results in genetic counseling .<br />

Acknowledgments:Supported in parts by the DFG (436RUS17/135/<br />

03;436RUS17/109/04,436RUS17/22/06),Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds<br />

and the Evangelische Studienwerk e .V .Villigst .<br />

P02.200<br />

the Effect <strong>of</strong> chromosomal Rearrangements on Gene<br />

Expression<br />

A. Reymond 1 , F. Schütz 1 , J. Chrast 1 , M. Delorenzi 1 , W. A. Bickmore 2 , L. A. J.<br />

Harewood 1 ;<br />

1 Center for Integrative Genomics, University <strong>of</strong> Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzer-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!